image description

Mount Greylock School Officials Estimate Building Renovation

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — In the best case scenario, renovating Mount Greylock Regional High School would cost a minimum of $28.1 million.

While the building subcommittee is going full force toward building a new school, they were asked to provide a Plan B  to both Lanesborough, for a long-range capital expense plan, and by the New England Association of Schools and Colleges, which threatened the school's accreditation if a plan was not in place to repair the school.

In 2006, the architecture firm Dore and Whittier performed a feasibility study that estimated a one-time renovation would cost about $22.4 million, which was the cheapest of eight options the firm developed. Committee member Thomas Bartels, an architect, talked with the company to update those estimates and returned with an increase of 21 to 25 percent just for the work to be done at once and even higher if done incrementally.

The figures are rough estimates and does not include securing the construction site from students, housing students or phasing in the work. It also does not include problems the school has listed since then, such as a lack of security system, nor does it include seismic foundations that were recently added to the state building codes.

Renovating just the science wing, which is in the most need, would trigger Americans with Disability Act regulations for the entire school, Bartels said on Thursday.

He also said recent renovation projects have come significantly over budget because of unexpected costs such as asbestos abatements and concealed work conditions.

While the committee does not believe a renovation would work, NEASC is asking for a plan to address the school's structure issues. That plan is due before the state School Building Authority responds to the school's request for reimbursement to build new.


Committee member Lyndon Moores responded to NEASC, emphasizing that building new is the primary plan but outlined the priorities the would have to address otherwise.

Additionally, Moores said the school is addressing the inadequacies by sending students to Williams College for their science labs, slowly replacing parts in the ventilation system, doing asbestos abatements as needed and slowly making the school ADA compliant.

The committee is also taking the school's deficiencies to the voters in hopes to win over the needed vote in both towns. A communications committee, which will be working under Superintendent of Schools Rose Ellis, is formed but needs a Lanesborough representative to lead the charge there.

David Backus, who was chosen to lead communications, said he needs a "point person" in Lanesborough. That committee will then be responsible for sharing not only the building project information but also educational changes the school has been making.

Ideas to spread information about the school include a "deficiency tour" in collaboration with the Greylock Eats group, which had agreed to help organize a community dinner to talk about the school that included a tour, committee member Paula Consolini said. The communications group is also looking to shoot a video of the school's problems to be shown on cable access among other plans for public outreach.

Tags: MGRHS,   school project,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planning Board Narrowing in on Subdivision Bylaw Changes

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board late last month discussed specific features of what it plans to pass as a new subdivision control bylaw this year.
 
The board long has discussed the complex set of regulations as being out of date and cumbersome to both potential developers and the board itself, which has needed to hear requests for waivers of outdated rules for the handful of residential subdivisions that have been proposed in town in recent years.
 
This spring, the town engaged consultants from Northampton's Dodson and Flinker Landscape Architecture and Planning to go through the existing bylaw, compare it to more contemporary regulations in other communities and help craft a revised bylaw.
 
Unlike the zoning bylaw, where amendments require approval of town meeting, the subdivision control bylaw is a creation of the Planning Board, which can make changes on its own after a public hearing process it hopes to complete this year.
 
At a special Planning Board meeting on May 26, Dillon Sussman of Dodson and Flinker and his colleagues walked the board through a dozen different decision points that the board must resolve — either by leaving the bylaw as is or making a change — and offered suggestions based on best practices.
 
All of the issues are technical and ranged from the fundamental, like how the bylaw will define types of subdivisions, to the highly specific, like what turning radii will be required in new streets that are constructed to serve planned developments.
 
One example of a topic that came up in the recent approval of a four-home subdivision off Summer Street is stormwater management.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories