Pittsfield Council Prepared To Offer $1 Million Incentive For Rail Company

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Corydon Thurston outlined PEDA's commitment to the project so far, which includes offering $1 million of their funds and meeting with the companies.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is prepared to offer $1 million in incentives to lure in a major rail manufacturing operation.

The state has issued a request for proposals for a company to build new rail cars for the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority with the requirement that they be built in Massachusetts.

The Pittsfield Economic Development Authority has aggressively went after luring in that contract, which could value $850 million and provide some 250 jobs, by offering $1 million of their own funds to help offset construction cost of the building.

On Tuesday Mayor Daniel Bianchi asked the City Council for $1 million more from the General Electric Economic Development Fund, a fund created through a settlement with G.E. aimed to redevelop the land.

The $1 million will go as an incentive to further offset start up costs at the William Stanley Business Park for whichever company wins the contract.

That fund, however, has strict restrictions including asking for firms to submit business plans, the jobs pay at least $35,000 a year and other specific information. Currently there are nine companies vying for the contract so the council won't have those details until much later in the process.

But that isn't stopping the council from offering it. The mayor's request was sent to the Committee on Community and Economic Development to draft a proposal that allows the money to be an incentive provided the specifics are provided when a firm is selected.

"We need to act very quickly and show these companies that we mean business," Councilor at large Barry Clairmont said.

Clairmont also wants to make sure there are specifics and an expiration date are included in the proposal to ensure they get what they want out of the incentive. The fund, which began as $10 million, carries emotions among residents because of the city's relationship with G.E.

"People are very, very concerned about this money. This is sacred money," Clairmont said.

While the money has many specific restrictions on how it can be spent, Vice President Christopher Connell says the money is losing value sitting in a low-interest bearing bank account. He called on the council to "seize the opportunity" and go after the contract.

"We need to be aggressive," he said.



PEDA Executive Director Corydon Thurston said the city is well positioned to reel in a company. He said three companies have already toured sites in the Berkshires. By upping the incentive, PEDA would be able to court the other companies seeking the contract, he said.
 

The Council was asked to contribute $1 million from the G.E. Economic Development Fund.

Additionally, Bianchi said the city has been working with potential suppliers of materials for the manufacturing.

"I think this is a tremendous opportunity to show prospective companies that we are interested," Bianchi said. "What we are trying to do is have a number that represents a solid commitment from the City Council and city government."

Despite the council voicing favorably of increasing the incentive, they agreed to follow the restrictions on the rules and send it to the subcommittee, who will work through the details.

"We need to stop for for business... This is economic development. This means jobs," said Ward 2 Councilor Kevin Morandi.

The mayor and Community Development Director Douglas Clark had hoped that because of the councilor's support they would have waived the rule to send it to committee and instead authorize to earmark the money on Tuesday night. Clark said the final negotiations are a ways off so the funds would remain earmarked and the details would be sorted later.

Bianchi added that a quick turnaround from the council will help show companies that they city wants the contract.

Multiple councilors spoke highly of not only the opportunity to reel in such a company and contract but also of the economic development agencies working on the project.

"Whatever we can do to help this project move forward, we will," said Councilor at large Kathleen Amuso said.

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories