image description
The Community Development Board felt it did not have enough information to vote on a proposed electronic billboard.

Electronic Billboard in Pittsfield Raises Safety Concerns

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Ward 3 City Councilor Nicholas Caccamo opposed the electronic billboard at Tuesday's Community Development Board meeting.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Community Development Board is worried about a proposed electronic billboard on East Street.

The board continued its hearing Tuesday night in hopes of receiving additional information from the developer. Lamar Advertising is proposing the county's first electronic billboard to be placed at the intersection of East Street and Elm Street.

But with a high volume of pedestrians in that area, including from Pittsfield High School, the Community Development Board is worried that it could be a hazard.

"I can see motorist being attracted to the sign and not see the children," said Louis Costi.

Board members felt the site plan wasn't specific because it didn't include the location of the posts, the size and dimensions of the billboard, and the directions it would be facing.

They asked the developer to return to the board with more specifics.

"I don't feel like I have the information to vote on this," said Craig Strassel

David Leavitt, who represented Lamar, said the sign "isn't very bright" and has never cause additional traffic safety hazards anywhere else. The sign changes every six seconds, he said, and can also be used for such things as Amber Alerts.

"It's not something you'd see in Vegas or anywhere like that. It is very subdued," Leavitt said. "It's not very bright."

But his assertion didn't alleviate concerns from residents in the area. Ward 3 City Councilor Nicholas Caccamo said he received many phone calls from concerned citizens.



"It's a high pedestrian traffic area eight months out of the year," Caccamo told the board. "I do not support the construction and placement of this billboard."

A resident who did not identify himself to the board said he is always distracted by electronic billboards when he travels.

"I can't keep myself from looking at the signs," he said. "We don't need a combination of distracted drivers and distracted pedestrians."

In other business, the board approved a special permit for a mini self-storage warehouse to be constructed at the Pittsfield Plaza on West Housatonic Street. Pittsfield Plaza had already went through the process to change the zoning to allow it and returned seeking the special permit.

"We're very excited about the project," said developer Joseph Genzano.

The 13.5-acre parcel formerly housed a movie theater and retail stores. In one corner of the property, 40,000 square feet will be redeveloped into the self-storage business. Genzano said the entire building will receive an upgraded facade to help attract other businesses to the plaza.

"We want to see a place that is alive," Genzano said.

The board also approved Tuesday night Arrowhead's request to bring farming back to Herman Melville's former home.


Tags: billboard,   commercial development,   farming,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories