Northern Berkshire Healthcare Files Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Mary Beckman, chief of the AG's Non-Profit Organizations/Public Charities Division, explains some of the difficulties for emergency services in North County.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Northern Berkshire Healthcare filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy Thursday morning, throwing efforts to restore emergency services in North County into uncertainty.

Judge John J. Agostini continued a temporary restraining order on North Adams Regional Hospital to restore emergency services through the auspices of Berkshire Medical Center. The restraining order is continued until a Tuesday hearing in Northampton.

Agostini's authority to continue the restraining order, however, is now called into question because of the bankruptcy filings earlier in the morning.

Attorneys representing the attorney general's office argued that the public health emergency created by the hospital closure takes precedent.

They are asking for a 90-day injunction — the amount of time required by state regulations for closing an "essential hospital service" — to allow time for alternatives to be considered.

"We are reacting to a difficult situation not of our making," said Bart Hollander, chief of the Western Massachusetts Regional Office for Attorney General Martha Coakley.

Daniel C. Cohn of Murtha Cullina LLP, representing Northern Berkshire Healthcare, said his client wanted the talks of reopening the emergency department to continue but the federal bankruptcy proceedings trumped the judge's authority. Until a federal trustee is assigned, there is no one who can make decisions regarding the hospital property.

"Really, there is nothing for this court to do," he said. "There is no one who has legal power to deal with the state's complaint."

Thursday's hearing in Berkshire Superior Court had been for an injunction to prevent the hospital from liquidating assets necessary to operate the emergency department. The temporary restraining order had been put in place last week to provide a mechanism for Berkshire Medical Center to begin the process of re-opening emergency services.

Northern Berkshire Healthcare's a sudden closure last week has complicated the process; there are also federal and state permitting processes that have to be followed.

Attorney John Rogers, representing Berkshire Health Systems, said 110 employees of NBH already have been hired.

Some electronic medical records have been integrated into the BHS system and another 10 days are expected to complete the process.

"We're concerned that a lack of certainty would impede progress," Hollander said.

Judge John J. Agostini extended the temporary restraining order although it was not clear he had authority to do so.

Berkshire Medical Center Inc., charged by the attorney general and state Department of Public Health to operate a satellite emergency service, has been in talks with the NBH leadership and DPH officials. Hollander said as earlier as 9:15 Thursday morning talks had "seemed fruitful and moving in a good direction but did not bear fruit."



There was fear the bankruptcy disruption could now sour negotiations and drag out efforts to reopen services.  

Mary Beckman, the AG's chief of the Non-Profit Organizations/Public Charities Division, said the hospital's closure has already had a significant negative impact on North County ambulance services, forcing them to engage more staff and equipment to manage the hours-long trips to BMC and Southwestern Vermont Medical Center, and their ability to supply items, including increased medical dosage for the longer transports.

"We would encourage your honor to at a minimum to extend the temporary restraining order for another 10 days, or longer than Monday," she asked, to at least ensure some stability.

The state's attorneys said they had learned Wednesday of the possibility of the bankruptcy filing, and were informed on their way to court Thursday morning.

Attorney General Martha Coakley termed the move a "surprise."

"Today's surprise bankruptcy filing by Northern Berkshire Healthcare and the North Adams Regional Hospital Board does not change our goal of ensuring access to safe emergency services for area residents. We are disappointed the board does not appear to share this same goal," she said in a statement. "We are pleased that the court extended its order through Tuesday and we will continue to work with all stakeholders with the purpose of reopening an emergency room in North Adams as soon as possible."

The hospital has previously been in Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which sets up plans for creditors to be paid off. Chapter 7 is another type of filing which allows the liquidation of assets. The restraining order requires all NBH-owned materials stay on premise.

The court also accepted intervenor status for the Massachusetts Nurses Association, representing more than 100 registered nurses at NBH, and Wells Fargo, a senior creditor. Neither the attorney general's office or BHS had issue with the either intervenor. The status of Health Care For All, an advocacy group for accessible health care, was taken under advisement.

Agostini continued the hearing, with the TRO in place, until Tuesday morning pending the appointment of a bankruptcy trustee and any agreements between the parties.

Cohn said afterward that a skeleton staff of essential personnel have been prepaid through the end of the week.  

"We are attempting to provide records, and extend whatever type of cooperation the Department of Public Health needs in order to get emergency services back on, limited, as quickly as possible," he said.

 A bankruptcy trustee would have to the authority to deal with patient records or the mortgage on the property held by the bondholders — including any leasing agreements for Berkshire Medical Center reopening the emergency room.

"We have performed our duties as best we can under the circumstances," he said.

This article was updated with Attorney General Martha Coakley's statement at 4:53 p.m.


Tags: bankruptcy,   closure,   NARH,   NBH,   superior court,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories