Pittsfield Committee Divided on Chiefs in Civil Service

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
The Civil Service advisory committee is split on whether to retain Civil Service for appointing the fire and police chiefs.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The majority of a temporary task force on Civil Service is leaning toward recommending the position of police and fire chiefs be taken out of the troubled system.

But representatives of those departments on the committee oppose such a move.

All members seemed to agree Thursday that permanent appointments need to be made for the chiefs of the fire and police departments, who are currently serving in "acting" or provisional capacities. The task force remains split, however, on the best way to do accomplish this.  
 
"I came into this leaning toward keeping Civil Service," said Michael McCarthy. "But what has really shocked me is the ineffectiveness and ineptitude of the Civil Service office."
 
Non-union members of the committee envision removing these two positions from Civil Service, but only if it can be replaced with an improved selection process that is fair, apolitical and transparent.
 
"I don't want a chief of either fire or police department to ever be selected based on political whim, or to be pressured based on political whim," McCarthy added.
 
Three members representing local police and firefighters voiced opposition to taking either chief out of the Civil Service process, instead stressing a need to explore previously underutilized options within the bureaucracy, such as the use of Civil Service-approved assessment centers to expedite the process.
 
"We can change the way we hire chiefs and still keep them in Civil Service," said police union President Jeff Coco.
 
"There are options within the system before taking the drastic step of removing the position of chief from Civil Service," according to a letter to the committee from the Local 447 of the International Brotherhood of Police Officers, stating a unified desire to keep the position within the current system to avoid political vagaries.
 
"One of my biggest fears is that over time, it's going to get worse, in terms of dealing with the Civil Service office," said Committee Chairwoman Pamela Green "I want to find a way to make sure that Pittsfield isn't going to be stuck not getting the service it needs to get someone fairly appointed."
 
Out of about 350 police chiefs in Massachusetts, only 75 are still part of the Civil Service system; 150 communities use Civil Service for all officers within their departments. In 2010, a survey of Massachusetts police chiefs found that of 100 respondents, a majority favored taking the chief position out of Civil Service.
 
"It sounded to me like a lot of things I was worried about, haven't been an issue," Green said of communities that have left Civil Service, based on testimony from several former Massachusetts police officers.
 
Green suggested the task force will still be able to arrive at final recommendations even if there is division on the key question of removing these positions from Civil Service, citing overall consensus on many of the underlying findings about the need for legitimate appointments and maintaining a fair and transparent process for selection of chiefs.
 
The committee, which is purely advisory, is expected to generate its finished recommendations to Mayor Daniel Bianchi at a final meeting on May 1. It has been researching the Civil Service for three months.

 


Tags: advisory committee,   civil service,   police chief,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Officials: Unlimited Trash Not Sustainable, Toters Offer Cost-Savings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Unlimited trash pickup is not sustainable and will lead to higher taxes, city officials say.

Mayor Peter Marchetti began public outreach on Monday on the proposed five-year contract with Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Older residents packed into the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center for the first of three community meetings.

On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and would save the city $80,000 per year.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

"Trash collection is not free. You're already paying for it as part of your taxes that you pay. In this administration, in this proposal there is no 'I'm looking to create a trash tax,''' Marchetti said, explaining that trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since he first served on the council in 2002.

"So we need to find a way to stem the cost of trash."

Some of the seniors praised the new plan while others had concerns, asking questions like "What is going to happen to the trash cans we have now?" "What if I live in rural Pittsfield and have a long driveway?" and "What happens if my toter is stolen?"

"I've lived in a lot of other places and know this is a big innovation that is taking place over the last 20,30 years," one resident said. "It's worked in most places. It's much better than throwing bags of garbage on the side of the road."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories