Pittsfield Commission Investigating Complaint Against Mayor

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
Medford resident Doreen Wade filed a complaint against Mayor Daniel Bianchi with Pittsfield's new Human Rights Commission, saying he discriminated against her and threatened her.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — A new commission will look into claims by a Medford resident who says she faced discrimination by Mayor Daniel Bianchi in her attempt to relocate her business to Pittsfield last year.

Doreen Wade, publisher of the online New England Informer, accused Bianchi of hostile behavior toward efforts to relocate her online business to the city and refusing to hire her for a position in his cabinet following a publicity campaign against him by Wade.

"Our leadership is racist," Wade told the newly formed Human Rights Commission at its first meeting Monday. "There needs to be an investigation of what is going on in this city."

In her testimony, Wade called out all city government with what she says has been an ongoing pattern of discrimination and unfair hiring practices, and specifically Bianchi for racially insensitive comments and physically threatening behavior during meetings with him a year ago, allegations the mayor has referred to as "totally untrue."

According to Wade's account, she first met with Bianchi in spring 2013 to ask his help in transitioning her online publication, the New England Informer, to Pittsfield, and to address her views on a lack of diversity in city hierarchies.

Wade said Bianchi told her at this April 3 meeting she would receive no public funding assistance for bringing her business to Pittsfield, and made a series of impolitic comments in response to her initial assertions about equality in the city.

The web publisher quoted the mayor as saying, "there are no black role models in the school system, and that is why black students are not graduating" and that  "black men over 50 are unable to get jobs because they are not qualified."

Wade furthermore complained she was told there were no small-business loans or grants available specifically for minorities through the Pittsfield Economic Revitalization Corp.

Finally, Wade said Bianchi, at a second meeting later in April, made her feel physically intimidated when he shook his finger in her face during a heated exchange between the two.

"He performed an act of intimidation, also called cowering," Wade told the commission. "As far as I'm concerned, he committed an assault against me, as well as performing an act of criminal threatening." 

Subsequently, Wade said she had applied for at least five positions on Bianchi's staff, including the recently filled director of administrative services position, positions she said are not being posted properly to be accessible, and for which qualified minority candidates have been passed over. Additionally, she said she was informed by the mayor that she would not be allowed to apply for small-business loans available through PERC.

The publisher said while she currently resides in Medford, where she is also the complainant in an investigation of alleged hate speech by the city's local access television station, Wade said she has strong ties to the Pittsfield community.

 "My family has been in this area since the 1600s," Wade said, but despite this, claims she has been unable to relocate to Pittsfield because Bianchi refuses to work with her.  

"It has been horrific," said Wade. "I am not being allowed to have a living in this city."  

Wade's report did contain some identifiable inaccuracies, including a statement that city jobs are not posted at the Berkshire Athenaeum, and the assertion that the mayor sits on the PERC board that administers the small-business loan fund. The mayor is a member of the Pittsfield Economic Development Authority board, a separate entity.

Other claims have been denied by Bianchi since the allegations were first made in May 2013 and, to date, no hard evidence has been presented against him. However, Wade says documentation of much of her complaint exists and promised to provide this before the commission's next meeting in June.

The new Human Rights Commission, chaired by Pittsfield School Committee member Joshua Cutler, is still somewhat uncertain of what its role and process would be, as distinct from the recently re-established Affirmative Action Advisory Committee, and several members of the commission expressed disappointment with the absence of staff support. City Solicitor Kathleen Degnan was to provide the committee with legal counsel at its first meeting.

"I'm a little surprised that the solicitor is not here," said commission member Pamela Malumphy, "Certainly for the next meeting, there's so much that we need to do as a new body, working within another updated Affirmative Action Plan, that we need to make sure this is all coalescing."

In light of the investigatory nature of the commission, which includes provisions for taking sworn testimony under oath, Malumphy suggested that a formal request should be made to have the city's legal representative present at all future meetings.

"There were some pretty serious charges made here tonight," said City Council representative Churchill Cotton. "I think it's going to warrant a formal investigation, and I'm not sure how we go about doing that."

The commission will reconvene to continue reviewing the complaint at a meeting tentatively scheduled for June 9.


Tags: civil rights,   discrimination,   rights complaint,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories