image description
A site plan for 63 North St., with North Street, left, and Lee Terrace at bottom. The new location for Mather House is the dark gray area to the right. The lighter gray areas are parking.
image description
Lee Terrace resident Stephen Majetich addresses the Zoning Board of Appeals.
image description
Vincent Guntlow, right, discusses his plans for 63 North St.

North Street Development Passes Williamstown ZBA

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
ZBA Chairman Andrew Hoar, left, and Leigh Short.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Zoning Board of Appeals on Thursday cleared the way for a parcel at the corner of North Street and Lee Terrace to be the new home for the 1810 Mather House.
 
Vincent Guntlow made some changes to his property plan in light of last week's ZBA meeting, where a number of Lee Terrace residents expressed their dismay about the planned mixed-use development.
 
Although residents who attended Thursday's continuation of the public hearing on 63 North St. expressed appreciation for the changes Guntlow made, several said they were upset that the North Street parcel had been rezoned from residential to limited business in the first place.
 
ZBA Chairman Andrew Hoar was sympathetic to the latter concern but pointed out that his board was bound by the zoning changes approved by Annual Town Meeting in May 2013.
 
"We are not here to deny the petitioner the ability to develop his parcel," Hoar said before taking comments from the floor. "We are hear to try to work with the petitioner and the abutters, to do so in a way that facilitates as best we can both parties."
 
Stephen Majetich of Lee Terrace said he and his neighbors had no advance warning of the proposed zoning change before the 2013 annual town meeting.
 
"I'd like to have some information as a citizen of Williamstown how I could have some input with the town," Majetich said. "We wouldn't be sitting her today if there was more than the required notification."
 
Majetich and others said they would have liked notice of the Planning Board's deliberations in advance of the 2013 warrant article, which was designed to undo "spot zoning" on North Street and, in the process, rezoned some parcels, including 63 North St.
 
Article 32 on the 2013 warrant was recommended unanimously by the Planning Board and the Board of Selectmen, which routinely expresses an opinion about all articles on the warrant. And the article passed with little to no discussion at town meeting.
 
"I understand what you're saying," Hoar told Majetich. "But it's not this board's purview to review the [notification] process. I know as a citizen, I peruse the warrant articles before Town Meeting. ... It's part of being an active citizen."
 
Town Planner Andrew Groff, who serves both the ZBA and the Planning Board, explained that the Planning Board's role is more "legislative," while the ZBA is more "judicial," using a rough analogy to more familiar government structures.
 
"Sometimes, they give us something that's difficult for us to enforce," Hoar said.
 
At the 2012 annual town meeting, members of the ZBA rose to the floor to argue against passage of the Planning Board's proposed second dwelling unit bylaw on the grounds it would be difficult to enforce.
 
As for the current question, Guntlow altered his site plan to bring the Mather House (which he is acquiring from Williams College) three feet to the east of the original site. The slight change will allow him room to erect a 6-foot decorative, wooden fence that will provide more of a barrier to the Lee Terrace residence to the west.
 
Guntlow also made a slight modification to his planned parking lot on the east side of Mather House. That change satisfied Williamstown's fire chief, who attended last week's ZBA meeting to raise concerns about having room to turn around trucks in the parking lot and eliminate the need to back out onto North Street.
 
Residents at this week's meeting also queried the board about the kind of planting that would be used to screen Guntlow's property on its north side, fronting Lee Terrace.
 
In an effort to keep the property from looking "too commercial," the board asked Guntlow to consider using a mixture of evergreen species.
 
"Something is going around killing pines, something is going around killing spruces," Guntlow said. "That's why we went with hemlock [in the site plan]."
 
"Even if it was arborvitae," Hoar said. "Is that something you could ...?"
 
"Sure," Guntlow said. "I just want something I can plant that can live."
 
After receiving the board's blessing, Guntlow said he did not know exactly when the early 19th century house will be moved from Stetson Court to North Street. The move is being coordinated by Williams College, but he said he expects it to be done in late October or early November.

Tags: commercial zoning,   historical building,   special permit,   ZBA,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planners OK Preliminary Habitat Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board on Tuesday agreed in principle to most of the waivers sought by Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to build five homes on a Summer Street parcel.
 
But the planners strongly encouraged the non-profit to continue discussions with neighbors to the would-be subdivision to resolve those residents' concerns about the plan.
 
The developer and the landowner, the town's Affordable Housing Trust, were before the board for the second time seeking an OK for the preliminary subdivision plan. The goal of the preliminary approval process is to allow developers to have a dialogue with the board and stakeholders to identify issues that may come up if and when NBHFH brings a formal subdivision proposal back to the Planning Board.
 
Habitat has identified 11 potential waivers from the town's subdivision bylaw that it would need to build five single-family homes and a short access road from Summer Street to the new quarter-acre lots on the 1.75-acre lot the trust purchased in 2015.
 
Most of the waivers were received positively by the planners in a series of non-binding votes.
 
One, a request for relief from the requirement for granite or concrete monuments at street intersections, was rejected outright on the advice of the town's public works directors.
 
Another, a request to use open drainage to manage stormwater, received what amounted to a conditional approval by the board. The planners noted DPW Director Craig Clough's comment that while open drainage, per se, is not an issue for his department, he advised that said rain gardens not be included in the right of way, which would transfer ownership and maintenance of said gardens to the town.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories