Updated October 15, 2014 10:44AM

Pittsfield Council Upset With Process of Health Insurance Switch

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Adam Thornton explained the plans Blue Cross Blue Shield is offering the employees.

Updated: Wednesday, October 15, 2014 at 10:45 a.m. with comments from the PEC about their role in informing the unions about the proposal. 

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council is upset that the mayor did not include them in negotiating new health insurance plans for employees.

"That is an unacceptable breach of protocol and respect for the City Council," said Ward 5 Councilor Jonathan Lothrop.
 
The city's Public Employees Committee, which is made up of representatives of the city's 15 workers unions, voted to switch from the Group Insurance Commission to Blue Cross Blue Shield.
 
Mayor Daniel Bianchi said the switch came after negotiations between the city, the PEC and the health insurance company throughout the summer. Bianchi estimates that the move will save taxpayers $1.5 to $2.5 million.
 
"This was independently approved as a good proposal and one that would save the city conservatively between $1.5 and $2.5 million," the mayor said.
 
The actual comparison of savings is dependent on which options the employees choose. The City Council wasn't part of those negotiations and they say they should have been. 
 
"I believe we should have had a vote. That is my opinion," Lothrop said.
 
The switch started with the unions voting down a change. Bianchi says Blue Cross then countered with another offer, which led to a long negotiation. In September the union representatives voted in favor of the newly crafted plan the two sides hammered out.
 
According to PEC Vice Chairman Brendan Sheran, the PEC held six open sessions throughout the process for the bargaining units to understand the change. He said while not every bargaining unit attended, the group "made a really serious effort to inform our people."
 
But many of the union members felt they weren't well informed by their representatives on the board.  On Tuesday, a few city employees used the open microphone period to say the vote was taken in haste with them only finding out about the issue the Friday before the Monday vote.
 
The sides reached agreement the week before the vote and then councilors began fielding phone calls from employees concerned about the change.
 
"It is concerning to me that my first awareness was a constituent e-mail on Sunday morning, the day before the vote was taken," Lothrop said.
 
Vice President Christopher Connell said he is supposed to be a "buffer" between the administration and constituents and when he got the calls, he didn't know what to tell them. Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo said he is a member of the GIC and didn't know about the change.
 
"It is clear that there is not a working relationship with the City Council and the mayor," said Ward 6 Councilor John Krol.
 
The council voiced concern about the contract. Adam Thornton of Blue Cross Blue Shield outlined the plan to the City Council. The plan is specially tailored to the union's wants.
 
"There are many benefits in our plan that will save out-of-pocket costs for our members," he said.
 
Massachusetts Interlocal Insurance Association Vice President Joseph Callahan also supported the claims that the city will see a savings of more than $1.5 million.
 
"The majority of employees will save an average of $264 annually," he said.
 
According to Bianchi, one of the negotiating points was that some who chose a certain plan would actually pay extra. The mayor says a mitigation fund is being created to help those employees offset their costs.
 
"We think we have a very good safety net for those who could be harmed," Bianchi said.
 
Despite the mayor and MIIA's reassurance, Lothrop said he is worried about what will happen in the future.
 
In year two there is a cap of 5.3 percent the rates can raise but nothing dictates the cost after that. In year three, the city has no option to go back to the GIC nor in year four would anyone know the Blue Cross rates at the time the city would have to commit to going back to the GIC.
 
"In year three, we have no idea what this is going to cost," he said.
 
Mark Meunier, director of government programing for MIIA, said he understands the concern but reassured that MIIA will be looking out for the city's cost.
 
"This is what we do. We have an entire dedicated unit to work with municipalities," he said.
 
The mayor defended the process, saying the unions were involved throughout the process. It is the representatives who are responsible to act on the union's behalf and their responsibility to inform their members. 
 
However, the councilors rejected that notion, citing a long process and a City Council vote that led to joining the GIC. 
 
Details of Blue Cross Blue Shield's plan is available below.

BCBS Pittsfield 2014 Benefit Comparison

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories