Human Rights Commission Dismisses Case Against Bianchi

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
The Human Rights Commission dismissed the case on Thursday.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Human Rights Commission dismissed the accusations that Mayor Daniel Bianchi engaged in racist actions against a Medford woman looking to open a business in the city.
 
The commission opened an investigation into claims from Doreen Wade that Bianchi was hostile and racist toward her last year. The complaints date back to 2013.
 
But the investigation ran out of steam and Wade became uncommunicative with the commission.
 
That lack of communication and inaction from the investigating subcommittee led the state to order the release of some 200 pages of evidence to iBerkshires.
 
"I don't agree with what the state said in terms of coming to this determination. But, I understand it," said member Pamela Malumphy. 
 
That determination and iBerkshires' two-part story laying out all of the evidence for the public led Malumphy to feel that the ad-hoc committee was "futile" in moving forward.
 
The investigating committee failed multiple times to reach Wade in Medford and it was just a few weeks ago when they found out she had moved to Framingham. Human Rights Commission Chairwoman Cecilia Rock said Wade stopped responding to emails and hadn't asked about or attended any of the hearings. 
 
"This has been tough in the last month and a half between not hearing from the complainant and this letter hanging out there from the state," Malumphy said.
 
The ad-hoc committee cited the state's determination that there is not an ongoing investigation as grounds to dismiss the case. Member Churchill Cotton, however, said he wouldn't dismiss it unless the commission itself found grounds to do so. Wade's lack of communication was the tipping point for Cotton.
 
"If we decide to dismiss the case, that is one thing. But for us to dismiss it based on what an outside agency says, I have a problem with that," Cotton said.
 
The full commission accepted the committee's report but ultimately dismissed the case based on Wade's lack of communication as well as the secretary of state's determination.
 
Member Robert Sykes said he was disappointed that they were unable to follow the case through to the end. 
 
"I think it would have been a good trial balloon for who we are and what we stand for. But it vaporized," he said. "I was hoping we would have had to deal with it and benefit from it even if the growth was painful."
 
Sykes wasn't upset with iBerkshires' reporting and public records request, saying, "the media did us a great service with their reasonable explanation of what took place," but rather that the case fell flat. 
 
He said the committee will certainly be acting more efficiently with the next complaint. 
 
Related Stories:
Documents Detail Conclusion of Bianchi Complaint
PITTSFIELD - 01-06-2015 - "I do not believe he is going to be able to handle the affirmative action part but I will give him the benefit of the...
Documents Detail Complaint Against Mayor Bianchi
PITTSFIELD - 01-05-2015 - "This was the most strange conversation with anyone in a little over a year that I've met." — Mayor Daniel...
State Orders Pittsfield To Release Contested Documents
PITTSFIELD - 01-05-2015 - "It is my finding that the City has failed to satisfy its burden in responding to this records request." —...

 


Tags: civil rights,   human rights,   public records,   racism,   rights complaint,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Officials: Unlimited Trash Not Sustainable, Toters Offer Cost-Savings

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Unlimited trash pickup is not sustainable and will lead to higher taxes, city officials say.

Mayor Peter Marchetti began public outreach on Monday on the proposed five-year contract with Casella Waste Management for solid waste and recyclables. Older residents packed into the Ralph J. Froio Senior Center for the first of three community meetings.

On the table is a move to automated pickup utilizing 48-gallon toters, which would be at no cost to residents unless they require additional toters and would save the city $80,000 per year.

The goal is to execute a contract by July 1, the start of the fiscal year.

"Trash collection is not free. You're already paying for it as part of your taxes that you pay. In this administration, in this proposal there is no 'I'm looking to create a trash tax,''' Marchetti said, explaining that trash pickup for fiscal year 2025 is around $5.1 million and has doubled since he first served on the council in 2002.

"So we need to find a way to stem the cost of trash."

Some of the seniors praised the new plan while others had concerns, asking questions like "What is going to happen to the trash cans we have now?" "What if I live in rural Pittsfield and have a long driveway?" and "What happens if my toter is stolen?"

"I've lived in a lot of other places and know this is a big innovation that is taking place over the last 20,30 years," one resident said. "It's worked in most places. It's much better than throwing bags of garbage on the side of the road."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories