Williamstown Con Comm Blasts Waubeeka for Tree Cutting

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Conservation Commissioners Robert Hatton, left, Chairman Philip McKnight and Hank Art said they expected restoration of the riverbank.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Conservation Commission on Thursday night took to task the new owner of Waubeeka Golf Links for removing vegetation from the banks of a section of the Green River that flows through the course.
 
Michael Deep was in front of the commission to ask for its blessing for a couple of other projects at the 18-hole facility on New Ashford Road (Route 7).
 
But in the course of a Thursday afternoon site visit to prepare for that evening's hearing, something else caught the commissioners' eyes.
 
"We noticed that a substantial bank on both sides of the Green River was cleared of vegetation — large trees, native trees, willows, along with some native exotics," Commissioner Hank Art told Deep.
 
Art then proceeded to read at length from the minutes of the commission's May 22, 2014, meeting, at which Deep, having just bought the course, asked for permission to remove some invasive species of plants along the river.
 
At that time, the panel determined that the kind of work Deep wanted to do required a Notice of Intent and a more thorough examination by the commission.
 
"Mr. Art stated this has happened in the past (invasive removal) and great care must be taken to not greatly disturb the root systems which can cause excessive sedimentation," the minutes of the 2014 meeting read.
 
Five paragraphs later, they read: "Mr. Art stressed the importance of having a plan to address which plants will be removed."
 
Deep asked the commission at the 2014 meeting if it would be comfortable hearing a plan submitted by a representative of the Hoosic River Watershed Association, and the Con Comm agreed that the expert in question would be a good resource.
 
But several more times, the minutes show that several commissioners said a more detailed plan was needed.
 
"Mr. [Robert] Hatton also expressed concern that there is a lack of concrete and specific plans and noted that an NOI [Notice of Intent] is likely more appropriate," the minutes read.
 
"Mr. Deep asked if he will be able to maintain this area," the record of the discussion wraps up. "Mr. [Richard] Schlesinger stated yes, but only if we issue an order of conditions."
 
After all of that emphasis on the need to have a plan approved, the commissioners appeared dismayed that vegetation was taken out of the natural resource area without its permission.
 
"Is there any doubt in your mind that you were instructed not to do anything with the riverbank until an NOI was filed?" Con Comm Chairman Philip McKnight asked Deep.
 
Deep explained the unauthorized cutting by saying it wasn't his intent to go against the commission's wishes.
 
"We did it," Deep said. "I take full responsibility for that. ... The reason is we wanted to keep the men working all winter, and we had projects lined up. This project turned into a bigger project than I thought it was.
 
"It shouldn't have been done. I acknowledge that. I'm prepared, with the permission of the commission, to put back what was there."
 
The commission asked deep to come to its April 23 meeting with a repair plan. After the panel reviews that proposal, it likely will issue an enforcement order in May, McKnight said.
 
Waubeeka owner Michael Deep received permission for two other projects.
"It would be my preference to — having been dealt lemons — to come up with some lemonade ... so that in fact you can accomplish what you were trying to do on May 22, 2014, of having an NOI of how a restoration of that site would be accomplished," Art said. "Right now, you have a clean slate, although it's filled with potential hurt. If nothing were done, invasive exotics would come back worse than when you started.
 
"My preference would be to require restoration of that site and to do that through an NOI. That would require someone who knew the wetland plants."
 
Since Deep appeared at Thursday's meeting with two representatives from the civil engineering firm Guntlow & Associates, the commission asked engineer Charlie LeBatt and wetland scientist Megan Myers to help Deep develop a plan to restore native vegetation to the denuded areas.
 
"This is an extraordinarily disturbing matter," Con Comm Chairman Philip McKnight said. "This commission is required to protect the water resources.
 
"For something as blatant as this to occur — to have that disobeyed so flagrantly is really disturbing to us.
 
"We want you to put your best efforts into repairing that riverbank. Do you understand the commission's intent?"
 
Deep said he did and indicated that he would return to for the April 23 meeting as requested.
 
In the meantime, he walked out of there with the commission's approval and a set of conditions to undergo a pair of projects on the golf course starting this year.
 
According to a plan developed by Guntlow, Deep wants to rehabilitate a pond by repairing an existing dam and dredging the pond. In addition, Deep sought permission to install subsurface drainage and improve irrigation in one part of the property and drill a well to supplement the course's irrigation needs.
 
All of that work was approved with conditions by the commission. McKnight made a point of emphasizing the terms of the permission.
 
"Mr. Deep, have you heard clearly what we've done tonight with respect to the Notice of Intent you brought to us?" McKnight asked.
 
"Yes," Deep replied.

Tags: conservation commission,   notice of intent,   wetlands,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Mount Greylock School Committee Moving Superintendent Evaluation to Fall

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass.—The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee this month discussed moving its evaluation of the superintendent from the spring to the fall starting in 2027.
 
Chair Julia Bowen brought the idea to the table as part of her proposed calendar for the committee's work during the 2026-27 academic year, saying that a move to the autumn will allow the committee to factor data from the preceding year into its evaluation.
 
"To the extent that [Superintendent Joseph Bergeron's] goals are tied to school performance and, specifically, MCAS [scores], we don't get that or other end of school year summative information until the fall," Bowen said. "Many schools I've worked with and know of actually moved their school leader evaluation to the fall so they can take advantage of all the data that's actually available, rather than doing it in the June time frame.
 
"The other point on that is, as it is, we otherwise vote for Joe's goals in September/October and evaluate him in May, and that's not a year. If we can do it fall to fall, we actually get a full year of work from when we agree on the goals."
 
The committee's most experienced member, Carolyn Greene, raised a concern about breaking with the practice of completing the evaluation process in May and June.
 
"It feels natural to evaluate a superintendent at the close of a school year, not the beginning of a school year," Greene said. "We're still in it in May and June. We're still in it in terms of our mindsets. Sometimes we don't meet in July. We come back in August and do a ‘retreat.' We're now meant to hit the ground running with an evaluation in September based on the work of the previous school year. And the reason is we don't get all the data from the previous school year until September.
 
"The rhythm is off for me. But it could just be that I'm so used to the previous rhythm. I don't want to oppose it. I just do have some reservations about it."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories