Pittsfield Looks For Answers to City Hall Basement Flooding

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
An area in front of city hall was dug up this week to assess the foundation issues.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Architects are trying to figure out how to stop the flooding in the basement of City Hall.
 
Workers under contract with Barry Architects dug up the area at the building's corner near the intersection of Fenn and Allen streets to get a close look at the issues surrounding the flooding.
 
The basement floods often and with recent storms, did so again. 
 
"They are just trying to diagnose the problem," Director of Administrative Services Julia Sabourin said on Friday. "This is the planning phase."
 
The City Council approved the capital budget, which includes $100,000 for foundation repairs in the front of the building. Sabourin said Barry Architects is now looking at the flooding issues to determine a quote for the repairs. 
 
"They will be digging up all of the area in front of City Hall," Sabourin said. 
 
The basement's flooding issues aren't new. Sandbags are permanently kept down there to stop water and nearly all of the documents stored there are placed on pallets to raise them off the ground.
 
However, with recent heavy rains, some documents from the 1980s and 1990s were damaged. The city had to receive state permission to destroy some of the Health Department records, but mostly the documents that were damaged didn't need any extra permission to be destroyed.
 
"Everything is pretty much on pallets at this point," Sabourin said. "All of the areas that normally flood, flooded."
 
Any damage caused by that flooding will be covered by insurance, she said.
 
The city has only allocated funds to repair the flooding issues in front of the stairs, but officials say there are other areas that will need to be addressed in the future. 
 
But flooding is not the only issue impacting City Hall and City Councilors have recommended a full assessment is completed. Sabourin said at this point there is no timeline for actual repairs to the foundation. 
 
The corner dug up this week is also in the same area where workers dug up and ran cables from City Hall to 100 North St. when the inspections departments were moved. Sabourin said part of the work being done this week is to determine if that installation had any additional impact on the flooding.
 
The Vermont marble building on Allen Street was constructed as a post office in 1911, with several additions over the ensuing years including a two-story section on the south side in the 1930s. Originally built for $115,000, it housed the Pittsfield Post Office and other federal offices until the U.S. Postal Service swapped it for land the city owned on East Street in the 1960s. 
 

Tags: city hall,   flooding,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories