This handicap parking spot on North Street is right where cars are turning onto North Street from Park Square. Someone with disabilities would have to travel into oncoming traffic and around the corner or down at least one block to find a curb cut onto the sidewalk.
Pittsfield Councilors Take Issue With Lack of Handicap Parking Downtown
Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell filed a petition requiring at least one handicap parking spot for every 10 others in the downtown area.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell says it is a "disgrace" that there is no handicapped parking on Elm or West Street.
There is only one on Tyler Street and that was only recently added. The few on North are in locations without a nearby curbcut. There isn't even one in front of a store on North Street which sells motorized wheelchairs.
It's unacceptable for Connell.
"I've heard people mention that they can't find a space and they are being told there are handicapped spaces at the McKay Street garage. Are we kidding? Are we serious?" Connell said.
Connell is petitioning the City Council to craft a new ordinance that says there needs to be one handicapped space for every 10 spots on North, South, Tyler, Elm, and West Streets. Further, he wants the City Council to have the say over where they are located.
"Our population is aging. We have insufficient spaces for people with physical disabilities to park and shop in our downtown and visit some of these other streets," Connell said.
He said about half the population is elderly and some 20 percent of those have physical disabilities. But, they struggle to find spots to park in downtown areas - essentially cutting them off from a section of the community.
"What are we telling the public? That we don't care?" Connell said.
Resident William Sturgeon said recently he went to Walmart, which is known for its many handicapped parking spots, and couldn't find a single one available. But when it comes to downtown shops, they are few and far between. Sometimes the ones that are downtown are tucked off a side street or in a dangerous location. Residents John Ostelleno and Ken Keefner both agree and say in the winter when the roads are barely plowed, it is nearly impossible.
The petition will go before the City Council and for other councilors, the standout point is that the elected officials will have say over where the spots are located. Ward 5 Councilor Donna Todd Rivers says using "common sense" in locating them will go a long way. But, what is really needed is enforcement.
"My only other concern is enforcement. There is not a lot of enforcement," Rivers said.
Councilor at Large Melissa Mazzeo says there should also be better signage for the spots as well as increased enforcement.
Councilor at Large Peter White says the petition is "long overdue" and that he has been advocating for one spot particularly on North Street to be moved. Right now, a driver would need to step out into oncoming traffic to get to curb cut.
Also coming in front of the council is a petition from the Historical Commission to extend the authority it has to delay demolitions of buildings more than 75 years old.
According to City Planner C.J. Hoss, more than 150 structures have received approval for demolition since an ordinance giving the commission the ability for a six-month delay while just three have been delayed. The hope is to extend the period out to a year, which would give stakeholders more time to find an alternative solution to save those buildings deemed to have historical significance.
"Despite turnover over the last 10 years, the commission has been very understanding of properties," Hoss said when it comes to the financial and other impacts a delay would have on a developer or property owner.
The former Plunkett School had a six-month delay but as soon as it ended, the building was torn down. Some lament that the building could have been saved. On the other hand, the former Crane Mill on Dalton Avenue was delayed and ultimately the developer opted for a reuse plan instead.
"Extending that delay, doubling that timeframe, would really try to create an impetus for discussion with the developer," Hoss said. "Having a longer delay period does provide a better position to negotiate."
Another such case would be with a 1780s mill on Churchill Street. The purchasers of the property thought it was just a typical 1800s structure and wanted to raze it and build a new home. But, historical documents date it back to being one of the first buildings in Berkshire County still standing. Hoss said a lot of the times historic buildings are being lost before anybody even knows the significance.
The petition also takes the Community Development Board out of the equation. That board was responsible for making a determination on the delay after the Historical Commission recommended one and the change would give sole authority to the Historical Commission.
Mazzeo voiced concern about residential housing, saying it could be a hardship for homeowners to take down structures. But Hoss said his staff already has authority to make an on-the-spot ruling for the typical structures such as old garages already.
"About half of the demolitions the Historical Commission has signed off on are accessory structures," Hoss said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule
By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.
Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.
Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.
The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some.
"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.
A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.
Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.
"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."
The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.
"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.
"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also."
Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.
In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.
Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.
Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.
"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.
Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.
"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.
The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the grant conditions were properly followed.
Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.
The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal. click for more
The town election is less than a month away and, unlike recent ones, all open seats are uncontested, with even a vacancy remaining on the Planning Board.
click for more