PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city's proposed budget does not include changes to the trash pickup system.
But Mayor Linda Tyer has identified it as a priority.
In February, the Resource and Recovery Commission endorsed a plan to give households a 35-gallon tote for trash and as much as a 95-gallon tote for recycling. Those totes will allow the Republic Services to switch to automated trash pickup. It would be the third time the City Council has attempted to make such a switch; twice it failed to gain votes enough votes to pass.
Tyer created an internal working group to iron out all of the details before sending it to the City Council. That group consists of the mayor, Director of Finance Matthew Kerwood, who also chaired the Resource Recovery Commission, the city solicitor's office, Commissioner of Public Services David Turocy, health officials, and Parks and Open Space Manager Jim McGrath.
"We're developing the program. We are taking the recommendations of the Resource Recovery and the working group is looking to put them in action," Kerwood said on Tuesday. "We are building the framework for how the program will operate."
There is a wide array of details to be sorted. The city solicitor's office is involved with negotiating contracts with Republic Service, the company which handles the curbside pick up. The working group is identifying state grants to pay for the toters, and figuring out which department would be tasked with writing and following up on the grant. There are needed changes to city code and the Board of Health. Kerwood said a state Department of Environmental Protection grant is due in June so he hopes to have more details after that.
"We would hope to have something a little more concrete to talk about in early summer," Kerwood said.
The program recommended by Resource Recovery is estimated to be a $1.8 million capital expense to purchase the totes. But it is not in the five-year capital plan. Kerwood said if the city can get a grant, it may not have to borrow for the totes.
Ward 3 Councilor Nicholas Caccamo had submitted the petition and he's comfortable with the pace the program is being developed. He said there are still remaining questions about payments, what happens with overflow, how and if residents can buy second totes, and holiday exemptions. Caccamo says he'd rather see those details sorted administratively rather than at the City Council's Rules and Ordinance Committee.
"I'd rather see [the group] hammer those details out and give us some to go to [Ordinance & Rules Committee] with that has questions answered," Caccamo said. "It's slow moving but I'd rather see something take its time and actually pass."
The discussion on a toter system began back in September. Caccamo says the major benefits of the system, which is used in a number of communities throughout Massachusetts, is that the city is cleaner, recycling rates increase, and it is a much more efficient system.
"Right away we get a much cleaner city," Caccamo said, adding that right now excess trash is piled on curbs and sidewalks where animals can get into the bags. The totes would be more secure and thus lead to less trash being strewn around.
As for recycling, the Resource and Recovery Commission estimated the city currently only recycles at an 11 percent rate — a rate Caccamo calls "abysmal." The estimate is that would increase to 33 percent.
And there has been an estimated $87,000 in cost savings estimated. Caccamo said that may not be much when it comes to the city's budget, but every little bit helps.
"This is some smaller steps to close the budget gap," he said.
In the FY18 budget book, Tyer identified the switch to a toter system as one of four key initiatives. While discussions may pick up this summer, Kerwood said, if any change to the system is made it wouldn't be until the very end of FY18. The timeline is somewhat stretched out because Kerwood said those involved want to leave a long lead time to education the public about the changes.
"We're really focused on the education piece," he said.
The proposal would be a major change, which is why Kerwood wants to make sure there is enough time for public engagement. Since filing the petition, Caccamo said he's received a "split" response with some wanting it and others opposing it.
"I hope residents will keep an open mind when they see what is being proposed by the city," Caccamo said. "I think the benefits outweigh the negatives by a long shot."
Particularly, Caccamo said he finds people with connections to other toter systems, as in a friend or relative lives in a town with one, and those who recycle a lot tend to be favorable of it. While those oppose tend to have concerns that it would be an extra tax on larger families. Caccamo believes if families embrace the recycling portion of it, the change won't cause much of a hardship.
"I think when people actually get into the system, a lot of their concerns will be alleviated," Caccamo said.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.
Your Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue. Name-calling, personal attacks, libel, slander or foul language is not allowed. All comments are reviewed before posting and will be deleted or edited as necessary.
No Comments
Pittsfield Switching to OpenGov for Permitting Software
By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city plans to move on from its "clunky" permitting software in the new fiscal year, switching to OpenGov instead.
On Thursday, the Finance Subcommittee supported a $199,269 free cash appropriation for the conversion to a new online permitting software. Chief Information Officer Kevin Zawistowski explained that Permit Eyes, the current governmental software, is no longer meeting Pittsfield's needs.
The nearly $200,000 appropriation is for the software license and implementation. Going forward, the annual cost for OpenGov will be about $83,000; about $66,000 for the next fiscal year, not including building permits.
"We've had significant issues across the board with the functionality of the system, right down to the actual permits that they're attempting to help us with," he said.
"Without going into details with that, we have to find a new system so that our permits can actually be done effectively, and we can kind of restore trust in our permitting process online."
The city is having delays on permits, customer support, and a "lack of ownership and apology" when mistakes are made, Zawistowski reported. Pittsfield currently pays $49,280 annually for the software, which Open Gov is expected to replace after July 1.
Running alongside this effort, the city wants to bring building permitting software under the city umbrella, rather than being countywide under the vendor Pittsfield is moving away from.
Finance Director Matthew Kerwood explained that the city has gone through a procurement process, OpenGov being the lowest bidder, and the vendor has been paid with contingency money "because we needed to get this project moving." He said Permit Eyes is a "clunky" piece of software, and the company has not invested in technology upgrades where it should have.
On the agenda is a request to borrow up to $15 million for upgrades to the city's two water treatment plants, the Cleveland and Ashley Water Treatment Plants. click for more
The City Council is backing state legislation that updates the funding model for community media, including Pittsfield Community Television, to account for declining cable revenues. click for more