image description
The City Council is looking to smooth out its process when it comes to traffic orders.

Pittsfield Considering Lowering Speed Limits In 'Densely Settled' Areas

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council approved lowering the speed limits on Spring Street, on a section of Benedict Road, and in a section of Linden Street, to 25 miles per hour.

Those are just latest in a yearlong trend of individual roads being lowered. The state's Municipal Modernization Act went into effect just short a year ago, allowing councils to change speed limits in thickly settled or business districts without having a required speed study.
 
Ever since then, councilors have been filing petitions to do so in their wards. Now, Ward Councilor Nicholas Caccamo is preparing an order calling for the roads in those districts to be dropped all across the city - alleviating the paperwork and process for every individual road.
 
"Picking or choosing 10 streets doesn't serve the police well and it doesn't serve the drivers well," Caccamo said.
 
The council considered an omnibus bill last October, just before the act was enacted. But, City Solicitor Richard Dohoney said at the time that each individual road may have to be identified. Since then, however, Dohoney said about 50 percent of the towns who have used the provision had crafted overarching orders for all.
 
"We are doing it a right way, there are multiple ways to do it," Dohoney said on Tuesday.
 
Previously roads in thickly settled or business districts were 30 mph and the only way to lower that would be to petition the state. The state required a speed study done, paid for by the city, and the study would determine a speed limit based on actual speeds traveled by vehicles on the road.
 
Caccamo had previously submitted an omnibus petition, which is before the Traffic Commission, and Dohoney said he'd review that to ensure the legal language is proper. He said the petition doesn't have to be "exotic."
 
The city, however, has been having issues when it comes to making any changes with traffic. There have been numerous traffic petitions that the City Council approved but the recommendations were never implemented. 
 
"I know a couple of us have some from well over a year we haven't heard anything back about," said Ward 4 Councilor Christopher Connell.
 
One of the most recent ones was a stop sign at the intersection of Pomeroy Avenue and East Housatonic Street. Ward 5 Councilor Donna Todd Rivers said she found City Council votes to implement a three-way stop there dating back to 2004 but it was never completed.
 
The City Council on Tuesday approved the Traffic Commission's recommendation that directs Turocy to look into tree trimming, install a solar flashing stop sign, and any other measures deemed appropriate at that intersection.
 
"This was a starting point just to see how this was going to work and if we are able to decrease the number of accidents occurring at this intersection," Connell said.
 
Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities David Turocy said that work has even further slowed this year because there is no city engineer. The position has been vacant since February and while Turocy said there have been numerous individuals interviewed for it, there is no candidate for the position right now.
 
Some of those traffic petitions require review from the engineer before being implemented.
 
Further, the City Council is looking to rework the process for which orders are passed. For years the City Council has approved reports from the Traffic Commission and then awaited an official traffic order to be written by the mayor's office. That order hasn't always made it back to the council for a vote. The council will now try to align the vote on the Traffic Commission's recommendation with the legal order for a traffic change.
 
"We will work on getting a system where if traffic votes on something, the order is ready too," City Council President Peter Marchetti said.
 
Dohoney said the mayor's office does reserve a veto right. Marchetti added that some changes also require the issuance of a legal notice and getting those posted and aligned with the council's vote will be considered as he works to smooth the process out.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories