image description
The Mill Street Dam has been eyed to be removed for a number of years.

State Awards An Additional $400K Toward Removal Of Pittsfield Dam

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The state has allocated another $400,000 to remove the Tel-Electric Dam on Mill Street, bringing the total money for it to over $2 million. 
 
"This puts us in a much better position to feel confident that when we put this to bid we will have money for the things we want to do," Parks and Open Spaces Manager Jim McGrath said.
 
The project is the largest aspect of a broad vision city and state officials see for the West Branch of the Housatonic River. There have been a number of projects completed, and others in the cue, to improve the health of the river's eco-system and better interaction with the neighborhoods from Wahconah Park to Clapp Park.
 
"The largest and most complicated project is the Mill Street Dam removal. The reason for removing the dam is two-fold: it is an old derelict piece of infrastructure that serves no purpose today. The dam was originally built to service hydroelectric power for the adjacent mill building but also removing the dam will create some connectivity within the river where there currently isn't any," McGrath said.
 
The project received its first amount of funding in 2008 from the Housatonic River Natural Resource Damage Fund. The state's Department of Fish and Game used that to contract a detailed study on the sediment quality and quantity and the report called for up to $4.75 million be spent on removing the sediment built up behind the same.
 
That cost stalled the project somewhat as officials continued figuring out ways to manage what is there once the dam is removed. The Fish and Game won a $1 million federal grant award through the U.S. Department of Interior's Hurricane Sandy Coastal Resiliency Competitive Grant Program for the demolition in 2016.
 
Princeton Hydro LLC began engineering the actual removal and started the permitting process. Engineering such a project isn't so straightforward because for a century, sediment has built up behind the dam and upstream, so engineers need to look at the integrity of the bridges and roads upstream to determine how they'll be impacted when the sediment is gone, the river is flooding in new places and riverbed is changed. Then craft additional plans to reinforce the infrastructure or redirect water flow if needed. 
 
The active railroad bridge was cited as a particular concern. Fish and Game contracted with Gomez and Sullivan for that infrastructure work.
 
Meanwhile, McGrath said concerns were raised through the environmental permitting process about the newer plan to slowly release sediment into the river. Those involved in the project have since tweaked that, and with that comes increased costs. 
 
"The largest price tag within the project is how we handle sediment. Originally we had envisioned sediment being slowly released downstream but now we are re-evaluating that and it looks like now we will be taking the sediment out and disposing of it," McGrath said.
 
"That is going to be expensive so this funding will help support that new approach, a more ecological approach."
 
It isn't quite clear how much much the project will cost but the additional $400,000 helps with what has been an evolving number. McGrath said the current estimates are between $1.5 million and $2 million for the work. 
 
The money is part of Gov. Charlie Baker's administration's $10.2 million in awards released on Wednesday as part of the Dam and Seawall Repair or Removal Fund and the governor's capital budget.
 
"The Dam and Seawall program provides vital support to our communities so they can better prepare themselves, their economy and natural resources for natural hazards like coastal and inland flooding," Baker said in a statement.
 
"Our administration was proud to recently pass a $2.4 billion bipartisan environmental bond bill that included over $500 million to help communities improve their resiliency to climate change and protect the environment."
 
Locally the dam has a notable recent history. In 2013, Christian Giovanni Marquez, of Los Angeles, was swimming by the dam when he got sucked into a spillway and trapped against a grate at the bottom of the river and drowned. 
 
The area has also become a place of blight and a nuisance and an area that has attracted criminal activity. So the dam's removal hits on a number of fronts: better environmentally, improved safety, and reduced blight and crime.
 
"This site is a known location where things happened that we don't necessarily want to see in our city," McGrath said. "Shining a light on this site is absolutely something we want to do."
 
The dam is attached to the Hawthorne Mill Building, which used to house the Tel-Electric Piano Player Co. Factory and has been falling apart. In the last 18 years, from when the Massachusetts Office of Dam Safety cited it as a dam of concern, no money has been allocated to it since the idea has been to take it down. 

Tags: dam,   Housatonic,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories