Letter: Pittsfield Gazette Founder's Passing Leaves Void in Pittsfield

Print Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

There's an old saying that competition brings out the best of the competitors, so homage must be paid to Jonathan Levine. Over the past two decades, I have come to know Jonathan quite well, and have immense respect for his contributions to Pittsfield. Truth be known, Jonathan would cover things that The Eagle did not. This pertained to whether a subject was to be covered at all, or if covered, the detail to give it.

One local elected official, who I will keep anonymous but might point out that they went from the Pittsfield City Council to higher office, said that reading Jonathan's account of a Pittsfield City Council meeting in the Pittsfield Gazette was just like reading a transcript. This was said with the highest praise — it was truly objective journalism that these days is lacking. The tone and tenor of the article was set by those that attended the meeting, with salient quotes from all, and not from the personal predilections of the journalist.

I am not sure journalists today have an understanding just how opinionated their so-called "objective" news pieces really are. Jonathan was old school. He was not afraid to voice his opinion, but it was in well-defined opinion areas of the Pittsfield Gazette. Based upon innumerable conversations I had with him over the years, he was more conservative than the area (a fact not known to the general public), yet this did not show in his journalism. And it barely showed in his opinion pieces. Don't get me wrong, I know of a former mayor who could not stand his journalism. But this had more to do with specific criticisms of behavior while in office, rather than advancing a conservative or liberal agenda. Jonathan did have an uncanny ability to find legitimate faults in local government and was not afraid to say so.

Eagle articles, by choice and arguably necessity, were far less detailed, did not cover most City Council agenda items, and usually did not cover subcommittee meetings unless there was some hot topic. Nor does iBerkshires or local radio fill this void. Levin's absence constitutes a real "void," where that term is thrown around too often in a cliché manner after someone's death. What Jonathan did really will not be replicated. Quite literally, we will be less informed because of it. This is not to bash The Berkshire Eagle or iBerkshires or local radio, it is just that The Eagle covers all of Berkshire County, and a reader in Adams wants to hear about Adams, not the details of the Pittsfield Parks Commission.



While my columns have been published in numerous newspapers around the country, and too many to count have been published in The Eagle, I often turned to the Pittsfield Gazette to publish columns that were more in depth, or ruffled feathers The Eagle did not want to ruffle. From my numerous conversations I had with Jonathan, there was one criterion for which he did not waiver: it had to be about Pittsfield. This is not a given: just recently I read a "viewpoint" column in the Berkshire Edge, an internet newspaper (if that be the proper name) focusing on Great Barrington, which allowed a columnist to run a column on the New York gubernatorial race. Jonathan would never have allowed that stuff to fly and understood it was his mission to deliver news about Pittsfield that you couldn't get elsewhere.

A long time ago, I gave the former editor of the Eagle a Wall Street Journal column on one of the most successful local newspapers in the country. I am pretty sure he filed it in the circular file. The Wall Street Journal, when interviewing this newspaper, found that the secret to its success was the repeated mentioning of local names in a positive manner. Years ago, things such as my goal in inter-elementary school floor hockey made it to the Eagle. Eventually, this went away, and I believe to the detriment of this paper. But Jonathan never forgot that. He covered local high school plays. His editions with prom photos quickly sold old. Local, local, local. Names, names, names. And save for those holding public offices, these names were always in a positive light and made you want to pick up the newspaper.

When I was a young lad, I had an immensely powerful swing of the baseball bat. I had one major setback: I could never connect that powerful swing to the pitched baseball. Much of the spring of my youth was spent playing in a league for kids that did not make Little League — Minor League. Minor League baseball was around for over 50 years in Pittsfield, constituting countless memories for Pittsfield's men and some women. The Pittsfield Gazette had a long and detailed account of that league when it came to an end, along with photos of the past, which brought a tear to my eye. The Eagle did not cover the story. That was the difference Jonathan Levine brought.

Rinaldo Del Gallo
Pittsfield, Mass. 

 

 

 

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories