Cheshire Selectmen Concerned About Grant Monitoring Letter

By Brian RhodesiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

CHESHIRE, Mass. — The Board of Selectmen were unhappy to get a monitoring letter from the Department of Housing and Community Development related to the town's housing grant.

The letter outlined several issues, including invoice inconsistency, length of project times and homeowner complaints with the process. The DHCD asks the town, in the letter, to report on current projects and a plan to improve process deficiencies.

"There were quite a few issues that they found in their monitoring and how we're running the program," said Patricia Mullins of the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission told the board on Tuesday. "But DHCD will explain that monitorings are about providing guidance on what they see that needs to be fixed in a program. And so that's how we're looking at this. It seems a bit intense, but it's just saying, 'this is what you have to do to do better.'"

Several board members asked why Mullins did not mention this letter at last week's meeting when she gave an update on the program's status. Chair Michelle Francesconi said these issues could potentially impact Cheshire's ability to receive grants in the future.

"So we're the town of Cheshire, we're the grant recipients. This letter looks really bad for the town of Cheshire," she said. "And we're managing it, we are named in it. We're going to apply for future federal grants, and this makes us look horrible. So why did BRPC, as the management team, not come to the town of Cheshire and say it?"

Mullins said she received the letter on Dropbox shortly before last week's meeting. 

She explained that she had not gotten to look through it thoroughly. She said she chose not to discuss it at the time so she could prepare and better understand it during a followup meeting.

"I was in and out for other meetings and appointments and had not had time to really look at it and see, exactly, what our response should be or how to present it or even how accurate everything was," Mullins said. "I just felt like it's not intended to avoid coming in talking about it. It's just I felt like we needed to take care of what we originally planned that meeting for."

Regarding homeowner complaints and the speed of completing projects, Mullins said several factors, including COVID-19, have significantly delayed processes. One example she gave was difficulties finding willing contractors, which she said is a problem throughout Berkshire County.

"As we said last week, we really are not happy with how long it's taken to get through these projects," she said. "And there's a lot of administrative reasons why it takes a long time. And those administrative reasons are why we have so few contractors. And that is the core of the problem, is that we have very few contractors who are willing to bid on these projects."

Mullins said BRPC tries to take on a significant amount of procedural responsibility with grants like this, rather than leaving everything to the town. She explained BRPC has worked to keep the board, the town administrator and the citizen advisory committee as up-to-date as possible.



"We tried to take as much of the burden off of the town as possible," she said. "We try to do as much as possible while keeping you as informed as possible."

Mullins said the town and BRPC have until Dec. 3 to send a counter to the DHCD and talk about issues they have with the monitoring letter.

"So, in other words, we have the opportunity to respond," she said. "We're certainly going to improve any of the systems that they think that we should be doing better on, but we have the opportunity to respond, and if we don't agree with some of the things that are in here, we're given the opportunity to say that."

Also discussed at the meeting, Francesconi discussed the most recent Hoosac Valley Regional School Committee meeting. She said the committee had not yet acknowledged a list of questions the Selectmen had sent to them.

The next Cheshire Board of Selectmen meeting is scheduled for Nov. 16.


Tags: Housing program,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $87M Budget for FY27

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The School Committee has approved an $87 million budget for fiscal year 2027 that uses the Fair Student Funding formula to assign resources. 

On Wednesday, the committee approved its first budget for the term. Morningside Community School will close at the end of the academic year and is excluded. 

"This has been quite a process, and throughout this process, we have been faced with the task of closing a $4.3 million budget deficit while making meaningful improvements in student outcomes for next year," interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips said. 

"Throughout this process, we've asked ourselves, 'What should we keep doing? What should we stop doing? And what should we start doing?' I do want to acknowledge that we are presenting a budget that has been made with difficult decisions, but it has been made carefully, responsibly, and collaboratively, again with a clear focus first on supporting our students."

The proposed $87,200,061 school budget for FY27 includes $68,886,061 in state Chapter 70 funding, $18 million from the city, and $345,000 in school choice and Richmond tuition revenues.  It is an approximately $300,000 increase from the Pittsfield Public Schools' FY26 budget of $86.9 million. 

The City Council will take a vote on May 19. 

Thirteen schools are budgeted for FY27, Morningside retired, and the middle school restructuring is set to move forward. The district believes important milestones have been met to move forward with transitioning to an upper elementary and junior high school model in September; Grades 5 and 6 attending Herberg Middle School, and Grades 7 and 8 attending Reid Middle School. 

"I also want to acknowledge that change is never easy. It is never simple, but I truly do believe that it is through these challenges that we're able to examine our systems, strengthen our practices, strengthen our relationships, and ultimately make decisions that will better our students," Phillips said. 

Included in the FY27 spending plan is $2.6 million for administration, $62.8 million for instructional costs, $7.5 million for other school services, and $7.2 million for operations and maintenance. 

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Bonnie Howland reported that they met with Pittsfield High School and made two additions to its staff: an assistant principal and a family engagement attendance coordinator.

In March, the PHS community argued that a cut of $653,000 would be too much of a burden for the school to bear. The school was set to see a reduction of seven teachers (plus one teacher of deportment) and an assistant principal of teaching and learning, and a guidance counselor repurposed across the district; the administration said that after "right-sizing" the classrooms, there were initially 14 teacher reductions proposed for PHS. 

View Full Story

More Cheshire Stories