image description
The Parks Commission endorsed a plan to remove several trees and plant a number of new ones, including a Christmas tree, in Park Square.
image description

Pittsfield Commission Supports Park Square Tree Plan

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Tree talk resumed last Tuesday as the Parks Commission looked into the future of Park Square's canopy. 

The panel endorsed a plan to remove four trees and plant seven, including an evergreen that will serve as the city's permanent Christmas tree. 
 
"Park Square of course is the iconic center of our town," Park, Open Space, and Natural Resource Program Manager James McGrath said. 
 
"There is a tree canopy on Park Square which over time is compromised by its age and other factors — soil compaction, some disease, maybe perhaps air quality around the very congested Park Square." 
 
These factors have led to a decline in tree health and the city has hired Berkshire Design Group to develop a plan to address it. 
 
Of the 13 trees in the park's boundaries, a pear tree and three sugar maple trees are dead or in poor condition will be removed and the remaining seven will be pruned, thinned, or air-spaded. 
 
These trees are sugar maples and red oaks. 
 
Two weeping flowering cherry trees will be transported to the east garden area of the park. 
 
For plantings, the city is seeking to add four hackberry trees, a sweet gum tree, and a permanent Christmas tree. At a later date, there are plans to replace a historic elm tree in phase two of the project. 
 
The evergreen will possibly be a Colorado blue spruce. 
 
McGrath pointed out that there have been various conversations about planting the holiday tree in Park Square, as finding a tree has gotten increasingly harder over the years. 
 
"I think the time is now to do it," he said. 
 
"The annual effort to find a tree, get that tree pulled out for the crane, transport it, put the lights on it, it's annually a big deal just to get that through Park Square and because of some of the tree issues we've had over the years, the way we have to cable that tree looks a lot different now." 
 
He believes that there is support from both the commission and the community. 
 
"I think that certainly, the commission is receptive to that idea," McGrath added. 
 
"I think the community would be as well." 
 
If all goes well, the tree will be planted and ready for lights by the holiday season. It will be a bit smaller at 15 to 20 feet in height but just as good-looking and less labor-intensive, he said.
 
 
Phase 2 of the project, which is not being addressed at this time, involve replacing the iconic elm tree at that was planted in the 1990s to emulate an elm that was admired by Pittsfield residents in the city's early days. 
 
McGrath said it was a very handsome tree but split down the middle last year and had to be removed. 
 
"The idea is that we use the same location and replant the elm tree there," he said. 
 
"It's a little bit more tricky because it's a pretty big stump, there are pavers right up to the edge of the stump, so everything would have to be peeled back and that stump would have to be carefully excavated because there is sidewalk all around it and then we would have to carefully plant a new tree and then put the pavers back." 
 
It is a much more involved endeavor that may be a CPA project part two, McGrath added, but it is something that the city would love to do. 
 
He did find out that an organization called Pittsfield Tree Watch would like to gift the city with nearly $1,000 to purchase the elm tree when the time comes. 
 
In other news, the commission received an update on various park projects that are in progress. 
 
  • The city is $70,000 short for its project to make the restrooms at Deming Park handicap accessible. A funding application to the state's office of disabilities was not accepted and the city is working with the Office of Community Development to access Community Development Block Grant funds with the hope to have the restrooms constructed this season. 
     
  • The Springside Pond restoration is still in federal permitting and has contracted to have a third-party estimator access the cost. The project has been earmarked $650,000 from the American Rescue Plan Act committee.  
     
  • Final draft plans for the city's pickleball court in Springside Park will be ready by this week. They will be reviewed by the city and the pickleball committee and will be brought back before the commission in its February meeting. The courts are expected to be ready by the end of the summer. 
     
  • Last week the Wahconah Park Restoration Committee met its owner's project manager, whose first order of business is to help hire an architect through a designer selection RFP process mandated by the state. 
     
  • Progress has been slowed with the Springside Park pump track proposal as the city attempts to settle on an agreement with the New England Mountain Biking Association. There is some concern over the organization's lack of responsiveness over the last several months but the project has not been kicked to the curb. It was noted that the city is making sure to protect itself in the agreement that puts all of the park maintenance on NEMBA.

Tags: park square,   parks commission,   trees,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories