Berkshire Planning Commission, Senator Talk Rural Affairs

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — State Sen. Paul Mark and the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission say the governor's creation of a statewide director of rural affairs is a good sign for the region.

The senator was thanked for his support of rural communities over the years.

"I think that's a very big step for our small towns across Massachusetts," Executive Director Thomas Matuszko said at last week's meeting.

The position, which is housed in the Executive Office of Economic Development, will cultivate rural economic development and coordinate with secretariats and state agencies to ensure that state government is attuned to the unique needs of rural communities. 

"I think it's a really strong signal from [Gov. Maura Healey] that she is committed to actually paying attention to us actually, making sure that rural communities aren't forgotten," Mark said.

"And hopefully this person, as it will exist, will be a direct interface with both the Rural Policy Advisory Commission and with the members of the rural caucus in the legislature, and then with town and regional governments as well."

He was one of the co-sponsors of a 2015 bill filed by the late Stephen Kulik, former representative of the First Franklin District, to establish an office of rural policy. This session, the bill is filed in the House and Senate.

"Long story short, the bill would have created this office of rural policy with a rural policy executive director, and they would report to the board of directors that would be the Rural Policy Advisory Commission," Mark explained.

He has heard that actions as simple as helping small towns access grants and resources, which was the intention of the bill that was filed.

"I am still going to push for that bill, but we'll see how the first year or two goes," he said. "I imagine the governor is going to want to test it out the way she wants to test it out at first and we'll see how that goes."

Sheffield alternate Rene Wood asked if Mark has input on the position's duties as an appointee to the Rural Policy Advisory Commission.

He believes that Healey wants the position to work as closely with people who are well versed in rural affairs to be as successful as possible and imagines that the person will become a member of the RPAC.

"I guess what I would hope from people I serve is, as we give this a chance, if we find it to be useful to let us in the Legislature know what is going well and if there are things that they're not doing that we want to fix," Mark said.



"We don't want this to become just nonsense. We don't want this to become just lip service. This is either going to be effective or it's not worth doing."

The panel also discussed Chapter 90 funding, the struggles of grant writing in smaller communities, and the countywide housing crisis, and transportation issues.

"We used to have county government like other counties throughout the commonwealth and no longer have that and I feel that the BRPC has kind of filled some of that void as a county government type of entity," Chair John Duval said.

"It really is the one place where all the communities come together and have these discussions and grants we work on."

He wondered if there is anything more that the planning commission can do to aid the issues that were raised in the meeting.

Mark said that the organization does a great job and urged members to maintain and build connections to the executive branch of state government.

There was also talk about the state of virtual meetings after the provision that allowed virtual meetings under the open meeting law expires at the end of this month.  Mark explained that the governor’s supplemental budget includes an extension until 2025.

"It’s as definite as it can be until it happens that this is going to be extended till 2025 and then the conversation continues about continuing indefinitely," Mark said. "I support it continuing. I think, especially in our area, it's extremely helpful."

The House and Senate have extended remote participation in committee hearings.


Tags: BRPC,   rural policy,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories