Dalton Talks Zoning Bylaw Over Pub Parking Lot

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — A change in signage seems to have quelled neighbors' ire over errant parking and excessive noise by Zinky's Pub patrons. 
 
Since pub owner Bill Zink purchased and installed six new "no parking" signs in the adjacent residential parking lot things have improved, Deborah Merry, who filed a complaint with the town, told the Select Board last week. 
 
The board had referred the complaint to town counsel to see if there were any legal violations that need to be addressed with the pub's liquor license.
 
Since the signs were installed, Merry said she no longer hears or sees the patrons and the "last few weeks, it's been uncannily quiet." 
 
The original signs were low and difficult to see so Zink purchased six higher signs to improve visibility and reaffirms to the patrons not to park there or they will be towed. 
 
When the pub first opened up, Zink said had  a lot of out-of-town people checking it but that the number has since dwindled. 
 
The pub has also reduced its hours from 2 a.m. to 1 a.m. and made last call even earlier to ease the late-night crowds.  
 
Although he voluntarily reduced his hours, Zink said he has been flexible if it's only a few local people inside. He also hired a bouncer outside and inside for every Friday and Saturday to improve security.
 
Although the parking concerns have improved, residents attending last week's meeting said the pub's parking lot is in violation of a zoning bylaw. 
 
The board directed Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson to have the zoning enforcement officer review the lot. It did determine that the pub is not in violation of its license regarding parking. The town also has installed "no parking signs" on the street to aid in the parking issues near the pub but it is not a violation of Zink's license, Chair Joseph Diver said. 
 
Another resident said the zoning enforcement officer has been "stonewalling" him on the parking lot issue. 
 
Diver said residents who feel they are being "stonewalled" should go to the town manager with their concerns. The resident claimed he has been going from the town manager to the zoning enforcement officer for the past year and a half. 
 
Zink said the pub was a restaurant in 1900 and that he has a picture from the town's bicentennial.
 
Select Board member Dan Esko said the property pre-dates zoning laws so the parking restrictions that are being cited may not necessarily apply and the licensee could make that argument in Land Court.  
 
Zink's copy of the zoning bylaws from 1982 show that the owner added on to the building to make it into a restaurant sometime in the mid-1980s. 
 
Select Board John Boyle said the1980s action by the Zoning Board of Appeals granted an addition with conditions, so the property does not predate the bylaw. 
 
The zoning officer will review the complaint no later than the next Select Board meeting and Hutcheson will come before the board with his findings.
 
The pub also received a complaint of underage drinking that was reviewed by the town counsel, which determined that there is no evidence to support the claim so the pub is not in violation of its liquor license. 
 
"There's no evidence of underage drinking at Zink'y Pub. There's no violations reported by our Police Department to this board of any licensing concerns around underage drinking," Diver said 
 
"So that matter is therefore closed. There's no violation that this board can take action on and that is from our town attorney."
 
Diver said Police Chief Deanna Strout had assured him that if there were violations, she would inform the board to take action.
 
"She also shared that every time there is a concern of some level she talks to Mr. Zink and he addresses it immediately," he said. 

Tags: parking,   zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories