Dalton Talks Zoning Bylaw Over Pub Parking Lot

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — A change in signage seems to have quelled neighbors' ire over errant parking and excessive noise by Zinky's Pub patrons. 
 
Since pub owner Bill Zink purchased and installed six new "no parking" signs in the adjacent residential parking lot things have improved, Deborah Merry, who filed a complaint with the town, told the Select Board last week. 
 
The board had referred the complaint to town counsel to see if there were any legal violations that need to be addressed with the pub's liquor license.
 
Since the signs were installed, Merry said she no longer hears or sees the patrons and the "last few weeks, it's been uncannily quiet." 
 
The original signs were low and difficult to see so Zink purchased six higher signs to improve visibility and reaffirms to the patrons not to park there or they will be towed. 
 
When the pub first opened up, Zink said had  a lot of out-of-town people checking it but that the number has since dwindled. 
 
The pub has also reduced its hours from 2 a.m. to 1 a.m. and made last call even earlier to ease the late-night crowds.  
 
Although he voluntarily reduced his hours, Zink said he has been flexible if it's only a few local people inside. He also hired a bouncer outside and inside for every Friday and Saturday to improve security.
 
Although the parking concerns have improved, residents attending last week's meeting said the pub's parking lot is in violation of a zoning bylaw. 
 
The board directed Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson to have the zoning enforcement officer review the lot. It did determine that the pub is not in violation of its license regarding parking. The town also has installed "no parking signs" on the street to aid in the parking issues near the pub but it is not a violation of Zink's license, Chair Joseph Diver said. 
 
Another resident said the zoning enforcement officer has been "stonewalling" him on the parking lot issue. 
 
Diver said residents who feel they are being "stonewalled" should go to the town manager with their concerns. The resident claimed he has been going from the town manager to the zoning enforcement officer for the past year and a half. 
 
Zink said the pub was a restaurant in 1900 and that he has a picture from the town's bicentennial.
 
Select Board member Dan Esko said the property pre-dates zoning laws so the parking restrictions that are being cited may not necessarily apply and the licensee could make that argument in Land Court.  
 
Zink's copy of the zoning bylaws from 1982 show that the owner added on to the building to make it into a restaurant sometime in the mid-1980s. 
 
Select Board John Boyle said the1980s action by the Zoning Board of Appeals granted an addition with conditions, so the property does not predate the bylaw. 
 
The zoning officer will review the complaint no later than the next Select Board meeting and Hutcheson will come before the board with his findings.
 
The pub also received a complaint of underage drinking that was reviewed by the town counsel, which determined that there is no evidence to support the claim so the pub is not in violation of its liquor license. 
 
"There's no evidence of underage drinking at Zink'y Pub. There's no violations reported by our Police Department to this board of any licensing concerns around underage drinking," Diver said 
 
"So that matter is therefore closed. There's no violation that this board can take action on and that is from our town attorney."
 
Diver said Police Chief Deanna Strout had assured him that if there were violations, she would inform the board to take action.
 
"She also shared that every time there is a concern of some level she talks to Mr. Zink and he addresses it immediately," he said. 

Tags: parking,   zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council OKs Tax Incentive, Historic District Study Committee

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council has approved a tax agreement to transform a historical downtown property into housing, and an effort to designate a local historical district in that area. 

Last week, the council OKed a tax increment exemption agreement for Allegrone Company's redevelopment of 24 North Street, the former Berkshire County Savings Bank, and 30-34 North Street into mixed-income housing. Councilors also approved a study committee to consider a Local Historical District in the downtown. 

The subcommittee on Community and Economic Development unanimously recommended the TIE earlier this month. 

The historic 24 North St. with a view of Park Square has been vacant for about two years, and Allegrone Companies plans to redevelop it and 30-34 North St. into 23 mixed-income units. The total estimated capital investment for both sets of apartments is $15.5 million. 

The 10-year tax increment exemption freezes the current value of the property, base value, and phases in the increased property taxes that result from the redevelopment. The increased property taxes will be phased in over 10 years, with 100 percent forgiveness of the incremental increase in residential property taxes in the first year, decreasing by 10 percent each subsequent year over the term.

Last month, Gov. Maura Healey visited the site and announced housing initiatives that are expected to bring more than 1,300 units online, including units in Pittsfield and at the historic site. 

Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren pointed out that the TIE triggers Allegrone's ability to receive state tax incentives and grants, recalling that they could see as much as $3 million. 

"We have a vacant bank building that's completely empty and everything, and we're going to be able to put something in it, and part of this project does have commercial, but it's a lot of apartments too," he said. 

"So I mean, it's a lot of advantage to the city of Pittsfield." 

Ward 7 Councilor Katherine Moody said the $15 million invested in the downtown will pay dividends to the housing crisis, and in her five years of working at General Dynamics, she saw young engineers moving to the area struggle to find a place to rent or buy.  Moody had many questions about the proposal, as her constituents did, but felt they were answered. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories