Dalton Talks Zoning Bylaw Over Pub Parking Lot

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
DALTON, Mass. — A change in signage seems to have quelled neighbors' ire over errant parking and excessive noise by Zinky's Pub patrons. 
 
Since pub owner Bill Zink purchased and installed six new "no parking" signs in the adjacent residential parking lot things have improved, Deborah Merry, who filed a complaint with the town, told the Select Board last week. 
 
The board had referred the complaint to town counsel to see if there were any legal violations that need to be addressed with the pub's liquor license.
 
Since the signs were installed, Merry said she no longer hears or sees the patrons and the "last few weeks, it's been uncannily quiet." 
 
The original signs were low and difficult to see so Zink purchased six higher signs to improve visibility and reaffirms to the patrons not to park there or they will be towed. 
 
When the pub first opened up, Zink said had  a lot of out-of-town people checking it but that the number has since dwindled. 
 
The pub has also reduced its hours from 2 a.m. to 1 a.m. and made last call even earlier to ease the late-night crowds.  
 
Although he voluntarily reduced his hours, Zink said he has been flexible if it's only a few local people inside. He also hired a bouncer outside and inside for every Friday and Saturday to improve security.
 
Although the parking concerns have improved, residents attending last week's meeting said the pub's parking lot is in violation of a zoning bylaw. 
 
The board directed Town Manager Thomas Hutcheson to have the zoning enforcement officer review the lot. It did determine that the pub is not in violation of its license regarding parking. The town also has installed "no parking signs" on the street to aid in the parking issues near the pub but it is not a violation of Zink's license, Chair Joseph Diver said. 
 
Another resident said the zoning enforcement officer has been "stonewalling" him on the parking lot issue. 
 
Diver said residents who feel they are being "stonewalled" should go to the town manager with their concerns. The resident claimed he has been going from the town manager to the zoning enforcement officer for the past year and a half. 
 
Zink said the pub was a restaurant in 1900 and that he has a picture from the town's bicentennial.
 
Select Board member Dan Esko said the property pre-dates zoning laws so the parking restrictions that are being cited may not necessarily apply and the licensee could make that argument in Land Court.  
 
Zink's copy of the zoning bylaws from 1982 show that the owner added on to the building to make it into a restaurant sometime in the mid-1980s. 
 
Select Board John Boyle said the1980s action by the Zoning Board of Appeals granted an addition with conditions, so the property does not predate the bylaw. 
 
The zoning officer will review the complaint no later than the next Select Board meeting and Hutcheson will come before the board with his findings.
 
The pub also received a complaint of underage drinking that was reviewed by the town counsel, which determined that there is no evidence to support the claim so the pub is not in violation of its liquor license. 
 
"There's no evidence of underage drinking at Zink'y Pub. There's no violations reported by our Police Department to this board of any licensing concerns around underage drinking," Diver said 
 
"So that matter is therefore closed. There's no violation that this board can take action on and that is from our town attorney."
 
Diver said Police Chief Deanna Strout had assured him that if there were violations, she would inform the board to take action.
 
"She also shared that every time there is a concern of some level she talks to Mr. Zink and he addresses it immediately," he said. 

Tags: parking,   zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Seeks $28M Borrowing for Water, Sewer Infrastructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The city is seeking a total of $28 million in borrowing authorizations to upgrade its drinking and wastewater infrastructure. 

This includes $13 million for upgrades to the wastewater treatment plant and $15 million for upgrades to the Cleveland and Ashley Water Treatment Plants, which are located outside Pittsfield. The City Council referred the $15 million borrowing request to the Finance Subcommittee on Tuesday. 

The full drinking water project is expected to cost $165 million over the next 8 years, with $150 million for long-term construction and $15 million for near-term needs. The initial ask would fund the final design and permitting for Phases 1-3, Phase 1 of interim updates, allowances, and contingency. 

After the meeting, Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales explained that these are needed repairs so the current infrastructure can be stretched a little longer while design work is underway.

Pittsfield's two Krofta drinking water treatment plants were installed in the 1980s. The city says they are beyond anticipated useful service and at risk for catastrophic failure that could leave Pittsfield with a shortage of potable water. 

Krofta is a compact filtration system that Pittsfield will continue to use. There are four units at the Cleveland WTP and two at the Ashley WTP.  Morales said the system is "very good" but needs to be upgraded. 

"We were one of the first to use that type of technology in the 80s, and it's outdated now, and getting parts and getting repairs to it is very costly because of the outdated technology that it's using, and we can replace that with better infrastructure," he explained. 

"We need to build a chemical facility on the Cleveland side. We already have that done at Ashley with [American Rescue Plan Act] funds, largely, and then we need to build better tank holding systems at the plants to allow for chlorination to happen at the plant, instead of on its way down to Pittsfield." 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories