Pittsfield School Restructuring Study Survey Opening to Community

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — School officials want to make certain that the entire community has a voice in the Pittsfield Public Schools restructuring process.

With a series of public hearings and an online survey completed, the School Building Needs Commission requested input from people who are not students, parents, or teachers.

Drummey, Rosane, and Anderson (DRA) Architects, the firm conducting the study, will be reformatting the survey to include the general public and will be reopening it for the summer. Once released, there will be outreach to generate as many responses as possible.

School Committee Chair William Cameron said not receiving feedback from a lot of people who may be affected by the process is an "educational and political" issue.

"I'm worried that in some sense, we're poisoning the well of what we are at work doing here and that it would subject us, even if people have been invited and don't participate, to accusations that we're only listening to a certain segment of the community," he said.

"And I don't know what to do about that but it's a concern that I have."

William Travis no longer has a child in the Pittsfield schools and was not able to take the survey, and that he had promoted it to groups that mostly consisted of seniors and they were not able to take it.

Travis asked that the survey is re-advertised so that the perception of non-school community members not participating can be changed.

Kathy Amuso agreed.

"You would have to do some re-education because I went on and I wouldn't go on again because I don't have children in the schools either so it didn't fit my needs," she said.

There were four opportunities for the public to weigh in on the study between in-person, virtual, and multilingual hearings at the end of May and the beginning of June.

A survey generated 416 parent and guardian responses, 385 responses from students Grades 3-12, and 364 responses from teachers.

Morningside Community and Crosby Elementary schools had the lowest responses due to lack of access to computers.



Parents felt that the district's classrooms, gyms, playgrounds, and locations were the best features.  Students said the PPS teachers and gym were the best features. Overall, the grounds were given a 6.27 out of ten rating and the safety was given a 6.78 out of ten rating.

Throughout the first stages of public input, some strengths and weaknesses have been identified.

The district's strengths include strong learning environments, a good disbursement of schools throughout the city, long-standing teachers and families, and the fact that students are generally happy with the buildings.

Weaknesses include undesirable support spaces, inadequate playgrounds, buildings that are not fully modernized, and buildings that need renovation.

There were also threats identified, which includes declining enrollment, a feeling that nobody will listen to feedback, a lack of local funding, and people not wanting to be a part of the solution.  

According to enrollment data, Pittsfield High School has 663 students with 24 percent of them on individualized education plans and Taconic has 837 students with 20 percent on IEPs.  Together, the high schools have 1,500 students and 21 percent are on IEPs.

Herberg Middle School has 488 students with 18 percent on IEPs and Reid Middle School has 458 students with 22 percent on IEPs.  Together, the middle schools have 946 students with 20 percent on IEPs.

With the same enrollment and IEP percentage for the elementary schools, Egremont Elementary has the largest population of 346 and Capeless Elementary has the least with 178 students.

"Our next real phase of this is to start thinking about some options here as to, given the data, given the issues that have been identified, what are some of the possible scenarios going forward," DRA representatives Carl Franceschi explained.

Throughout the summer, the committee is asked to consider school locations, travel times, grade alignment, school enrollment sizes, cohort class sizes and the number of transitions, and educational continuity.

DRA's next steps are to reopen the online survey, meet with curriculum leaders, compare the existing building to the Massachusetts School Building Authority guidelines, do a complete demographic and enrollment study, and test fit curriculum and enrollment into existing buildings.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   survey,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories