image description
The panel voted to order a demolition for 91 to 93 Orchard Street, which suffered a two-alarm structure fire on July 4, 2022, that charred the front porch and front portion of the home.

Pittsfield Health Board Orders Demo of Charred Multifamily

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. The Board of Health on Wednesday voted to demolish a condemned multifamily that was destroyed by a fire last year.

The panel voted to order a demolition for 91 to 93 Orchard Street, which suffered a two-alarm structure fire on July 4, 2022, that charred the front porch and front portion of the home.  It was condemned a few days later.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi explained that the department identifies properties with code violations that impair health and safety as condemned and after a year, they have the option to bring the property to demolish.

"We do that in most cases where there are no interested parties in the dwelling," he said, adding that it also ordered to be demolished if it becomes a public hazard.

Last month, neighbors came forward with complaints about rats, and the property was cited as a possible source. Upon investigation, there were no active burroughs but it still could have been possible, which caused the department to recommend demolition.

The owner of the property is currently in a large portfolio foreclosure and has not been responsive.

The order provides 90 days to take down the property and if the owner does not comply, it will have to go to court.

"I think we would pursue court action with this specific property," Cambi said. "Just because the owner, we do believe that they have the resources."

There is also a lender that is involved and is included in the order.

"I just think it's helpful for the public to know that because neighbors that are impacted, which is part of the reason the Health Department got involved," member Brad Gordon said. "It’s helpful for them to know that it's not that it's forgotten but there's a timeline in terms of addressing."

In other news, the BOH agreed to form a working group in collaboration with the City Council and the Conservation Commission to have a united front on mosquito control.  Cambi will go to the council and make the request.

The topic has been a back-and-forth disagreement between the council and the board for a couple of years.

Mosquito spraying was discontinued in 2021 and after six mosquitos tested positive for West Nile virus this summer, the board requested that it be resumed and the council did not agree.

"I think it was a relatively close vote. I don't know if that's relevant or not," Gordon said. "But I think what's more relevant is that if we again, go through this process as a board, even with involving the Conservation Commission, my concern is that we'll end up in a similar pattern again and I think that would be unfortunate and it also would be a waste of everyone's time."

The group would be subject to the open meeting law, required to have public meetings, and would get to work on a mosquito control plan for the spring.

Gordon pointed out that the council has the power to decide on funding and accepting the plan and said that they should be involved.

"We should be able to hopefully make a better effort to communicate, which I think was strikingly absent at the council meeting here where people were bringing up issues that I felt we had evaluated very carefully to a completely different conclusion based on the data we were looking at," member Dr. Jeffrey Leppo said.

"Which is not to say people can't disagree, but I think we ought to be able to agree what's good, what's in the public interest."

Gordon hopes that they can have a group together shortly after the new year in preparation for mosquito season.

"To me, that's government at its best when you take advantage of the resources that you have, and those resources work together, educate the public, and also, then come up with solutions based on best practices in science," he said.




 


Tags: demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fenton: Governor's Council Must Deliver for the Berkshires

Community submissionGuest Column
I am a Springfield lawyer running for Governor's Council and I am asking for Berkshire County residents to support me over an incumbent from North Adams. 
 
Here's why: Last year I learned about staffing issues in our regional courts that I could not ignore. In 2025, it was reported that four of Western Massachusetts' 11 Superior Court judgeships were vacant, all at the same time. A few weeks later, that grew to five vacancies. This meant there were only six Superior Court judges serving all of Western Mass at a time when Berkshire, Hampshire, Franklin, and Hampden counties had more than 100 pending homicide cases. 
 
Those numbers were alarming to me, so I started to engage with leaders in the community who work most closely with the court system and I came to learn that these vacancies were only the tip of the iceberg here in Berkshire County.
 
I learned that no Superior Court or District Court judge had been appointed from the Berkshires since the current incumbent took office. As a result, there is not a single Superior Court judge who lives in the Berkshires today, and several of the District Court judges drive in from other counties to support Berkshire courts in Pittsfield, Great Barrington, and North Adams. Court staff also informed me about severe staffing shortages at the Berkshire Clerk of Courts office resulting in other counties needing to loan staff to the Berkshires just so hardworking employees can take a brief and planned summer vacation. This is not normal. These issues are a reflection of genuine problems with the Berkshire County court system and show a lack of proactive attention from our Governor's Councilor.
 
Instead of focusing on regional equity, I watched as the current incumbent celebrated that she has voted against the governor's nominees more than any other councilor, without much explanation as to why. Most recently, she voted against two extremely qualified former prosecutors for the Parole Board. This was despite an in-person plea from the governor and a letter of support from all the three of the district attorney's from Western Mass. Those votes do not show independence or standing up for principles, they demonstrate naivete, and an unwillingness to work with the key stakeholders.
 
I had seen and heard enough. I decided to jump in the race and challenge the incumbent to address these problems head-on.
 
I am a partner of a regional law firm. I understand our courts and the importance of having qualified, fair and hardworking judges. And I know how important it is to have judges from the Berkshires serving the Berkshires. To achieve that, you need strong relationships with the legal community and local stakeholders. You need to know how to use the power of the Governor's Council to fight forcefully for our region. And you need to be laser focused on identifying vacancies before they occur so that they can be filled quickly with local candidates.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories