image description
The panel voted to order a demolition for 91 to 93 Orchard Street, which suffered a two-alarm structure fire on July 4, 2022, that charred the front porch and front portion of the home.

Pittsfield Health Board Orders Demo of Charred Multifamily

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. The Board of Health on Wednesday voted to demolish a condemned multifamily that was destroyed by a fire last year.

The panel voted to order a demolition for 91 to 93 Orchard Street, which suffered a two-alarm structure fire on July 4, 2022, that charred the front porch and front portion of the home.  It was condemned a few days later.

Director of Public Health Andy Cambi explained that the department identifies properties with code violations that impair health and safety as condemned and after a year, they have the option to bring the property to demolish.

"We do that in most cases where there are no interested parties in the dwelling," he said, adding that it also ordered to be demolished if it becomes a public hazard.

Last month, neighbors came forward with complaints about rats, and the property was cited as a possible source. Upon investigation, there were no active burroughs but it still could have been possible, which caused the department to recommend demolition.

The owner of the property is currently in a large portfolio foreclosure and has not been responsive.

The order provides 90 days to take down the property and if the owner does not comply, it will have to go to court.

"I think we would pursue court action with this specific property," Cambi said. "Just because the owner, we do believe that they have the resources."

There is also a lender that is involved and is included in the order.

"I just think it's helpful for the public to know that because neighbors that are impacted, which is part of the reason the Health Department got involved," member Brad Gordon said. "It’s helpful for them to know that it's not that it's forgotten but there's a timeline in terms of addressing."

In other news, the BOH agreed to form a working group in collaboration with the City Council and the Conservation Commission to have a united front on mosquito control.  Cambi will go to the council and make the request.

The topic has been a back-and-forth disagreement between the council and the board for a couple of years.

Mosquito spraying was discontinued in 2021 and after six mosquitos tested positive for West Nile virus this summer, the board requested that it be resumed and the council did not agree.

"I think it was a relatively close vote. I don't know if that's relevant or not," Gordon said. "But I think what's more relevant is that if we again, go through this process as a board, even with involving the Conservation Commission, my concern is that we'll end up in a similar pattern again and I think that would be unfortunate and it also would be a waste of everyone's time."

The group would be subject to the open meeting law, required to have public meetings, and would get to work on a mosquito control plan for the spring.

Gordon pointed out that the council has the power to decide on funding and accepting the plan and said that they should be involved.

"We should be able to hopefully make a better effort to communicate, which I think was strikingly absent at the council meeting here where people were bringing up issues that I felt we had evaluated very carefully to a completely different conclusion based on the data we were looking at," member Dr. Jeffrey Leppo said.

"Which is not to say people can't disagree, but I think we ought to be able to agree what's good, what's in the public interest."

Gordon hopes that they can have a group together shortly after the new year in preparation for mosquito season.

"To me, that's government at its best when you take advantage of the resources that you have, and those resources work together, educate the public, and also, then come up with solutions based on best practices in science," he said.




 


Tags: demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories