image description

Pittsfield Subcommittee OKs ADU Ordinance

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Ordinance changes that make way for accessory dwelling units will soon go before the City Council.

On Monday, the Ordinances and Rules Subcommittee supported a petition from the Community Development Board to establish an ordinance allowing the creation of ADUs. As a part of the $5.1 billion Affordable Homes Act signed into law over the summer, ADUs up to 900 square feet can be built by right in single-family zoning districts.

It will go to the council on Feb. 11 for a final vote.

Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey said this is great for multi-generational families and hopes that it provides some relief to the housing crisis.

"I know that some people might hesitate because they'll think, 'OK all of the garages in a single-family neighborhood are going to become an apartment over the garage and then they're going to have more people in the neighborhood.' But I think of this more as when my parents get older, I want them to have a place to live and it would have been hard for me to permit and do certain things," he said.

Proposed changes and additions will be in Article 23-2 Section 2.2 and Article 23-9 Section 9.101.  If approved, ADUs will be added to definitions as "An additional dwelling unit added on a lot that is accessory to a principal dwelling unit" and the city’s accessory use ordinance will amended to accommodate ADUs.

City Planner Kevin Rayner reported that the state narrowed dimensional standards.

"The draft regulation said the dimensional standards can be no more prohibitive than the principal structure on the lot," he explained.

"Now they're saying that it can't be more restrictive than the principal dwelling unit or the accessory use in that zoning district so they're essentially saying that whatever the most permissive dimensional standards, they will be applied to the ADU."

Director of Community Development Justine Dodds added that the state had to do a 30-day comment period and came out with the final regulation on Friday while saying communities have to be in compliance by February.

"It’s kind of an ever-changing goalpost here that we're trying to keep up with," she said.



This ordinance allows one ADU by right in any 1-2 family residential use within the city, provides a special permit process and criteria for additional ADUs, and provides a size requirement for ADUs that matches state legislation.

The state mandates that an ADU can be half the gross floor area of the principal dwelling on a lot or 900 square feet, whichever is smaller.

"The special permit granting authority will be the Zoning Board of Appeals unless that property is within the Downtown Creative District, then it will be the Community Development Board," Rayner explained.

"That's just to keep things consistent, because generally speaking, in the Downtown Creative District, it's the Community Development Board that would handle special permit applications so we just want to make sure that things are consistent with our permitting process."

Under the current code, an ADU in a residential district cannot exceed 15 feet in height, cannot be located closer than 10 feet to the principal building, and cannot occupy more than 10 percent of the total lot.

The Community Development Board became the petitioner for this effort in November.

Ward 6 Councilor Dina Lampiasi observed that much of the concern around ADUs has to do with short-term rentals, which the city is also working on addressing.  Rayner reported that the state gave the option to prohibit short-term rentals in ADUs but the city has chosen not to.

Pittsfield currently has no ordinance for short-term rentals.

"And the logic behind that was, if there's an ADU and it was to be used as a short-term rental, in my mind, the incentive would be on the homeowner," he said.

"They would want to rent out the bigger house as a short-term rental because they could rent it for more money and then use the ADU as a longer-term residence."


Tags: ADU,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

BRTA Focuses on a New Run Schedule

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Berkshire Regional Transit Authority is still working on maintaining its run schedules after dropping the route realignment proposal.

Last Thursday's meeting was Administrator Kathleen Lambert's first official meeting taking over the reins; retiring director Robert Malnati stayed during a transition period that ended last month.

Lambert is trying to create a schedule that will lessen cancellations. There was a two-hour meeting the week before with the drivers union to negotiate run bids and Lambert is working with the new operating company Keolis, which is taking over from Transdev.

The board spoke about anonymous emails from drivers, which Lambert said she has not seen. iBerkshires was not able to see those letters, but has received some. 

"They were lengthy emails from someone describing themselves as concerning BRTA employee, and there was a signed letter from a whole group of employees basically stating their concerns. So, you know, to me, it was a set of whistleblowers, and that, what my understanding is that this really triggers a need for some type of process to review the merits of these whistleblowers, not going to call them accusations, but basically expressions of concern," said member Stephen Bannon.

A letter iBerkshires received spoke of unhappy drivers who were considering quitting because of decisions being made without "input from frontline staff," frustration and falling morale, and the removal of the former general manager shortly after Lambert came in.

Lambert said it's difficult to navigate a new change. She also noted many drivers don't want to do Saturday runs and it has been hard negotiating with drivers on the new runs.

"I would like you all to keep in mind that the process of change is super difficult. Transdev has been here for 20 years, and some of these drivers have never known any other operating company, the way some of the operations have been handled has been archaic," she said. "So getting folks up to speed on how a modern transit system works is going to be painful for them. So I don't want to say that I'm unsympathetic, because I am sympathetic, but I am trying to coax people along with a system that's going to seem very strange to them."

The board spoke about better communication between them and Lambert, citing cooperation will be best moving forward.

"There's just a lot of stuff in the air right now, and there are a lot of fires to put out to make this a coordinated effort. And if we don't keep our communications open and be straightforward, then you get blindsided about how you know the input that you could get from us about your position, and how you know what's going on in your direction, and we get blindsided. And I think that we have to make sure that this is a collaboration," said member Sherry Youngkin.

"Both sides have responsibilities, because in the long run, this advisory board is going to have to make decisions as to how we brought forward and if we've gone forward in a fair and helpful way. And I think that's hopefully what everybody is looking for also." 

Transdev and Keolis held a three-day recruiting event interviewing almost 40 candidates and offering jobs to eight, but only three stayed on to start training. Lambert said it was disappointing but she will keep trying to retain more people.

In her first report to the board, she noted that ridership dipped a little over 10 percent, but still remains higher than last year, adding that was because of cancellations of services because of the lack of drivers.

Like the last meeting, some of the advisory board members were torn over the start of the Link413 service, worried that the start of the service took drivers away and the numbers of riders are low.

Lambert, however, said the ridership has doubled from last month.

"As I've spoken before, we have, generally, a six-month adoption for brand-new service before you can really go in and evaluate, are you being successful based on the grant that my predecessor wrote along with the team for PBTA and RTA, we are ahead of schedule, which is pretty good, so I'm hoping that will continue to improve," she said.

Member Renee Wood said the board never approved the service, adding the only thing she could find in the minutes was a vote to accept the equipment. She said it was supposed to be put on the agenda to discuss.

"The Link413 service has been three years in the making. It's been a grant that was accepted and has been working with our partners, PVTA and FRTA, to put into place. So I don't have the entire history of how that process worked, but it's been three years in the making, and did we not understand that once we accept that grant that we were going to put in new service?" Lambert said.

The board discussed if Title VI, the Civil Rights Act, was followed with an accurate review and accurate amount of time for public comment period on the service changes and if its attorney should review if the  grant conditions were properly followed.

Lambert said changes had the 60-day comment period included in the proposed route realignment packet, giving the opportunity for the community to respond to that as well but will look into the legality of the situation with their attorney.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories