Pittsfield Looks to Update Zoning for ADUs

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Accessory dwelling units will be by-right in early 2025 and the city wants to be prepared.

On Tuesday, the Community Development Board voted to become the petitioner for amendments to the City Code that reflect the new ADU legislation. City Planner Kevin Rayner has crafted a draft ordinance that the board will dig into before it goes to the City Council.

As a part of the $4.1 billion Affordable Homes Act signed into law over the summer, ADUs up to 900 square feet can be built by right in single-family zoning districts.

"This legislation will go into effect February 2, 2025, so we're trying to get our ordinance to accommodate ADUs by that point," Rayner said.

"Our ordinance wasn't prohibitive against accessory dwelling units, but we do need to up our dimensional requirements to kind of accommodate for them as they are, sort of like an accessory structure, in a way but they have some different requirements because they are being used as a dwelling."

The city plans to allow ADUs in a one- to two-family residential use, allowing for duplexes that meet other requirements to have one.

Most of the amendments will take place in Article 23 Section 9.101, which outlines restrictions for accessory buildings.  

"They're mostly dimensional. We're going to make it so that maybe you can't take up more than 20 percent of the lot coverage," Rayner said.

"We are going to have it be 20 feet from the rear lot line and the logic behind that is, like we said in the previous discussion, accessory structures can go from 10 feet all the way up the lot line as long as they meet fire code and we figured because it's a dwelling, because somebody's living there, you wouldn't want somebody right up against your rear property line who is occupying and living in that dwelling."

Under the current code, an ADU in a residential district cannot exceed 15 feet in height, cannot be located closer than 10 feet to the principal building, and cannot occupy more than 10 percent of the total lot.

"We've also talked about height in there, the accessory structure height is 15 feet and we have kept that standard in the ADU but it is amendable for a special permit," Rayner explained.

"So if they wish to go higher, or if there's an existing structure that they're putting an ADU in and that is over 15 feet that can be overcome with a special permit. The special permit granting authority in that case we've decided will be the Zoning Board of Appeals, unless that property is in the downtown Creative District, where then it would be this board."



He reported that one ADU is by right but any additional ADU will require a special permit.

"Each ADU will require one additional on-site parking spot to compensate for the increase in the dwelling," he added.

"And we've kept the size requirement consistent with the state legislation, which says it will be half the gross floor area of the principal structure or 900 square feet, whichever is smaller."

The state gave the option to allow short-term rentals to be ADUs, which the city has taken up.

"We’ve decided that we don't want to prohibit short-term rental ADUs," Rayner said.

"And the logic with that is, if you have an ADU on your property, the owner might go into an ADU and then rent out the main structure."

Board member Matthew Herzberg asked how the ordinance will work in districts with a form-based code, explaining that in some cases, it may be more permissive than what is written.  Rayner said that it should be allowed by right in residential areas but the city doesn’t want to be prohibitive and this will be considered.

The parking requirement may be something to look at, board member Libby Herland added, especially in the Downtown Creative District.

Also on the agenda was a discussion about short-term rentals, which is popping up all over Berkshire County. Rayner explained that these are trickier than ADUs.

"Short-term rentals are a little bit more tricky than the ADUs in how they are going to be regulated and how certain different departments within the city government will interact with each other in terms of short-term rentals," he explained.

"And so we wanted to take a step back and make sure our draft was a good place before we brought it before the board. We do anticipate that that draft will be ready by the December meeting."


Tags: ADU,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories