image description
Illustration of a proposed $7.3 million public safety building being proposed by the Select Board.

Lanesborough Advancing Combined Police/EMS Proposal

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Town officials will again propose a combined police and EMS facility to voters. This time, for a couple of million dollars more.

On Monday, the Select Board voted to advance a $7.3 million combined police/emergency medical services facility to town meeting, discarding the option for a $6.5 million separate build. The same design, then priced at $5.9 million, was shot down in 2023.

"We can't go to a town meeting and give them two options," said Selectman Timothy Sorrell, the town's former police chief.

"We have to decide, I'm ready tonight to make a motion on what I think is the best decision."

Members agreed that this option has stood the test of time and makes the most sense. Selectwoman Deborah Maynard noted it was a tough decision to make as a person on a fixed income, "but it's something that we need."

"I ran for Select Board in 2020 because I couldn't believe this town made our Police Department work in such a decrepit building for years," Chair Michael Murphy said.

"That bothered me enough that I finally chose to run."

The 7,222 square-foot combined police and EMS build would cost about $7,365,868. A 4,814-square-foot police station with a separate two or three-bay EMS facility would be $6,509,900, but the Select Board was advised that it might not be worth the money.

"The Lanesborough ambulance clearly needs a place that meets their needs. The Police Department, while temporarily situated in a rented facility, clearly needs a place that meets their needs. The committee's work clearly shows that residents support a combined police and ambulance, public safety facility," Public Safety Building Committee member Lisa Dachinger said.



She understands that funding a major project like this raises concerns about its impact on property taxes, recognizing that "no one at this moment can say with any certainty exactly what this project will cost and what the actual out-of-pocket expenses to our taxpayers will be when it is finished."

Dachinger strongly believes that if residents are offered the opportunity to vote on a Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion, the town will have a "yes" or "no" answer on funding the project.  

"If the vote is 'yes,' it will allow the town to continue to move forward and get a better handle on how much it might cost," she said.

"…If the vote is 'no,' that will be the end of it. I urge you not to kick the can down the road, but instead to empower our residents now to have a say in ensuring our town's public safety department needs are met in a fiscally responsible way by employing a Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion for a public safety complex facility."

Similarly, committee Chair Mark Siegars feels the joint facility is "probably the best." Also the chair of the Council on Aging, he reported that many of the town's seniors have higher incomes, and they should not be used as an excuse not to do the right thing.

"This idea that we're impacting fixed income people and seniors, Lanesborough has never qualified for any public assistance because our standard of living, average household income in Lanesborough, is pretty high for Berkshire County," he said.

Legal counsel will be consulted about pushing the Proposition 2.5 debt exclusion vote to a special town meeting. A "yes" vote would allow the question to be put on the town's ballot.

"Good luck to us all,"  Murphy said.


Tags: police station,   public safety buildings,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield: Should Park Square Be an Historic District?

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The committee drafting a proposed local historic district around Park Square wants to generate interest and participation in the process. 

Members launched the charge during meetings in August and September. A survey and public hearing are planned to gather feedback early on. 

City Planner Kevin Rayner explained they are not just doing this out of a love for historic buildings, but for the timeless sense of place you get when you step into Park Square, which was laid out over 200 years ago and hosted the first-ever agricultural fair in 1810. 

"I think that the main thing that we need to kind of park on is that this is the heart of our community, and it really sets the stage for the sense of place in Pittsfield, and any change to that should have some review and some consensus from folks who have a passion for protecting the history and that character of Pittsfield," he said to the new Local Historic District Study Committee last week. 

"And there's that private property versus historic resource thing, but I’d say that a lot of these buildings on the square belong to the soul of Pittsfield here, and deserve to be protected, and I don't think that the layer of regulation that we're throwing down here is going to be unreasonable or a real boundary." 

In March, the City Council voted to amend the City Code, Chapter 2, to establish the study committee.

Pittsfield has more than 20 locations on the National Register of Historic Places, including the Park Square Historical District, but the designation just allows communities to apply for federal tax credits and doesn't impose restrictions on buildings. The central area was laid out a few decades after Pittsfield was given a town charter in 1761.

A district can be one building, several buildings, or an area. Historic restrictions only apply to the exterior of buildings; the committee has authority to say a building in the district cannot be demolished. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories