"Quantitative Easing" or QE, may be a more familiar concept to readers, since we have been experiencing some form of QE (monetary stimulus) since the Financial Crisis of 2008. QT is the opposite. The Fed first tried to reduce its balance sheet back in 2018-2019. The stock market had such a hissy fit that the double-digit melt down that ensued convinced the central bankers to back down in their attempt to normalize their balance sheet. By the end of 2018, the Fed was allowing $50 billion/month to run off its balance sheet. Market turbulence erupted almost immediately and by March 8, 2019, the Fed under Jerome Powell, turned the money spigots back on and reversed the easing that "no longer seemed necessary." The crisis was over, and so was QT.

 

The problem, however, is that investors have become accustomed to the low interest rate environment that the Fed engineered through asset purchases and low interest rates. It has become an essential prop holding up equity values, which have climbed higher and higher.

 

Every time the Fed has sought to drain liquidity from the banking system, the stock market has reacted by staging a Taper Tantrum. There was one in 2013, another in 2019 and we are in one now.

 

Fast forward to the coronavirus pandemic when the Federal Reserve Bank bought a massive $3.3 trillion in U.S. Treasuries, and $1.3 trillion in mortgage-backed securities to support the markets. Those Fed purchases have not only contributed to the massive gains in the stock market in 2021, but also contributed to the present explosion in the inflation rate.

 

On April 6, the FOMC minutes of the Fed's March 15-16, 2022, meeting became available. The notes showed deepening concern among members that inflation had broadened throughout the economy. Most policymaker were prepared to raise interest rates in May by 50 basis points and continue these half-percentage-points hikes in coining policy meetings.

 

They also supported a second try at reducing the Fed's holdings of Treasury bonds. Up to $60 billion per month of U.S. Treasury bonds will be sold as well as reducing $35 billion per month in mortgage-backed bond holdings. That is nearly double the Fed's QT program from 2017 to 2019. By reducing the balance sheet, while moving the short-term, Fed funds rate higher in 50-basis-point increments. The Fed is again taking away the punch bowl for equity investors.

 

The news may have shocked most investors, but unfortunately it was part and parcel of why I have remained relatively bearish throughout the year thus far. Will investors double down on dumping equities or will they calmly go to the slaughter ahead?

 

I fear that an even worse sell-off may be ahead of us sometime in May 2022 when the Fed begins implementing QT.  The stock market has been practically straight down most of the week on news of this plan. I advised readers last week that the stock market had become too "frothy" after the bear market rally of last month. I wrote that we could see a pullback to "between 4,400-4,500 level on the S&P500 Index." We have accomplished that, and I am now looking for a relief rally that should continue for a week or two. After that, we face earnings season and the next Fed meeting. Strap in.

Speculation is not quite rampant but it's getting there. Volume is tailing off and the short covering that has boosted this market higher is fizzling. These are signs that beg for a nice sharp pull back that is overdue.

 

As I have been suggesting (hoping) over the last two weeks, negotiators from Russia and Ukraine are making progress. Investors are beginning to hear more positive statements from both sides. A combination of factors are pressuring negotiators to cut a deal that would be acceptable to both heads of state. I expect that to happen soon.

 

Remember that we are now approaching planting season in the Ukraine. The spring thaw will also make mobility difficult for the invading forces. The Russian army seems to be pulling back in some areas but bolstering its forces in others. I suspect that has more to do with the Russians' strategic intent to capture and hold areas that contain Ukraine's most valuable energy resources.

 

The stock markets' "fear" trades have already begun to dissipate as evidenced by the slide in oil prices. The red-hot price rise in wheat and fertilize stocks are selling off, and gold is faltering as well. But notice that all this good news on the geopolitical front during the past week has not moved the overall averages up by much. That is a tell-tale sign to me that the good news may have already been discounted and it may be time to take some profits on some of the gains we have enjoyed recently.

 

Of course, the flattening of the yield curve, which inverted for a brief time on Tuesday and Thursday, March 29-31, had the bears jumping up and down. A flurry of bearish commentators lined up to solemnly predict the curve will invert further and a recession is right around the corner when it does. What is an inverted yield curve, you might ask, and why is it so important?

 

According to Investopedia, "An inverted yield curve occurs when short-term debt instruments have higher yields than long-term instruments of the same credit risk." An inversion is the first sign that the long-term growth prospects of the economy are in trouble and have preceded every U.S. recession in the past 50 years. Typically, a recession has followed in the two years after an inversion of this measure.

 

However, before you leap into the lifeboat, remember the same thing happened in August 2019. I warned readers at the time not to jump ship, because I believed the condition was temporary. It was, and I think this time around the same thing may happen. If, over time, all the short term, versus long-term, debt instruments — one month, three-month, one-year, two-year, five-year, versus 10-year, 20-and-30 year — were to invert, well then that would be a horse of a different color. We are not there yet.

 

But my optimism concerning the longer-term prospects of the economy doesn't necessarily translate into the short-term prospects for the stock market. I believe that the financial markets are still not out of the woods. This relief rally off the lows is a bear market bounce in my opinion. It has further to go, but a day or two of pullback next week would be helpful. Unless the S&P 500 Index closes between 4,400-4,500 today (Friday, April 1), I expect next week we will work off some more of this froth.

 

Sometime in late April or May, we may see a return to the bottom once again. Why do I believe that when the latest data show unemployment dropped to 3.6 percent? A combination of persistent inflation, a slowing economy, expected tepid corporate earnings, and an even more hawkish Fed will simply be too much for the markets to take on board.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

Commodities continue to run. Interest rates are hitting new highs, and stocks are holding their gains from last week. Nothing has changed on the geopolitical front and all eyes are once again focused on the Fed and its next meeting in May. What else is new?

 

Stocks have been surprisingly resilient this week in the face of dire predictions that a recession is just around the corner. Many investors, and those who preach to them, are convinced that the Federal Reserve Bank is intent on hiking interest rates to a level where the economy will collapse as inflation continues to spike. One Citibank research team is now predicting 50-basis point increase in the Fed funds rate in May, June, July and September with a 25-basis point hike to follow. I am not in that camp.

 

You might remember back in December 2021, when I warned readers that Wall Street analysts would begin predicting a stagflation scenario sometime in the first quarter of 2022. Their conclusions are understandable, given the macroeconomic data, but I suggest that you take their predictions with a grain of salt.

 

Today, it is fashionable to say that the Fed has lost its credibility. Granted, their stance on inflation which they described as "transitory" proved to be wrong. I believe that global supply side shortages due to the coronavirus pandemic contributed to that miscalculation. It seems to me that estimating the extent of those shortages was, and still is, impossible for anyone to predict.

 

But that does not mean that the Fed is no longer creditable. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell and his FOMC members must thread the needle between raising interest rates to quell inflation, but not enough to hurt the economy. I don't envy their position, but I remain confident that they can do it, if anyone can. What I don't want to do is listen to forecasts from analysts with little or no experience in the areas of inflation and/or rising interest rates.

 

The war in Ukraine is now more than one month old. What Vladimir Putin believed would be a three-day war has resulted in a disaster of alleged war crimes, high casualties, and few Russian victories. The sanctions imposed by the West are beginning to bite and NATO is fast at work shoring up their defenses in Eastern Europe. It is a tinderbox looking for a match.

 

As such, headlines are still the main market movers with percentage point gains and losses commonplace. As I have written, if the VIX, the so-called fear gauge, continues to stay above 20 these big moves will continue. The good news is that VIX is now below 22 — down from more than 30 — two weeks ago.

 

I am keeping my fingers crossed, praying that a cease-fire could be in the offing soon. It appears that negotiations are progressing, although not as fast as most would like. Weather may play a part in bringing the two sides together. It is almost time for the sowing of wheat in Russia and Ukraine and without it, the world's population in many developing areas will suffer.

 

In addition, the change in weather will also bring a thawing of the land in Ukraine. Rivers will rise, rain will fall, and the frozen earth will turn to mud. It will become a nightmare of logistical problems for the Russian invaders as it did for the Germans in World War II. 

 

As for the stock market, given a 6 percent spike in almost as many days a week ago, a brief period of consolidation is to be expected for a day or two next week. If the S&P 500 Index can't get above the 4,530 area in the next day or two, I would expect the three main averages could give back some of their recent gains. That would be a dip to buy, because I still see the S&P 500 Index closer to 4,600 by the third week in April 2022.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The first interest rate rise in years was officially triggered in this week's Federal Open Market Committee meeting. Since then, stocks gained more than 5 percent on the news, which was contrary to many investors' expectations.

 

The reaction was even more confusing when you consider how hawkish Chair Jerome Powell and his FOMC members were both in the minute meetings and in Powell's Q&A session after the meeting. The Fed is officially planning for seven rate rises this year after the 25-basis point move on Wednesday.

 

The next hike could come as early as the central bank's next meeting in May. There is no guarantee that the next hike could be even higher than 25 basis points. That, said Powell, would depend on the data. The overall message, however, was clear enough: inflation is the Fed's No. 1 priority and will remain so for the months ahead.

 

You may remember that in my last column, I predicted that the markets would like the outcome of the meeting. The gains since then have been north of 5 percent. The positive reaction could have been fueled by Powell's contention that the economy remains strong and is in great shape to accommodate tighter interest rates now. His prediction that inflation could end the year below 5 percent could have also heartened investors. I question that number, but I think there was another reason for the gains, which was purely psychological.

 

As I have said countless times in the past, investors hate uncertainty. For months unanswered questions have bedeviled investors. "Will they, or won't they raise rates and by how much?" "How high will inflation rise, and what is the Fed really going to do about it?" "Will the Ukraine War temper the Fed's actions?" I could go on, but you catch my drift.

 

Uncertainty is what investors wake up to in the morning, worry about all day, and obsess over when we hit the sack at night. Clearing up even a little of the unknow has a beneficial effect on a market starving for stability.

 

But now that the Fed meeting is over, (until the next one) where will investors focus their attention? The obvious answer is the Ukraine-Russian crisis. Both sides of the conflict appear to be coming closer to a cease-fire. It would not surprise me to see a truce of some kind announced in the days ahead. You might ask, "Why?"

 

It is all about the calendar. Ukraine is running out of time, if their farmers hope to take advantage of the planting season for wheat and corn. if this war goes on, and the fields lay fallow, the world could face a life-threatening shortage of food. We are already facing massive shortages due to climate change and the coronavirus pandemic.

 

Unlike additional oil that can practically be pumped at the flick of a switch by Saudi Arabia or the UAE, additional food stuffs are governed by the calendar. If you miss the planting season, you can't do anything about it until the next season, which is months, if not a year, away.

 

So, if I am right, and the war winds down, we could see a few weeks of upside into April 20th or so. That could mean another 200 points or more tacked onto the S&P 500 Index from here. A cessation of hostilities would also recoup some of the losses in the beaten-up European markets. And let us not forget China, the world's second largest economy.

 

China's about face this week in promising to ensure stability in capital markets, support overseas stock listings, resolve risks around property developers and complete the crackdown on technology companies has removed another overhang weighing on the markets. If the Chinese government fulfills its promise to add more monetary and fiscal stimulus to their slowing economy, that may also eliminate some of the drag in the global economies brought on by the crisis in Eastern Europe.

 

U.S. stocks, under that scenario, would rise. I would imagine overseas markets would gain even more in the short term. But all these bullish actions would likely come to an end in late April as the next quarter's earnings season begins, the May Fed meeting and another rate hikes looms closer, and the inflation rate tops 10 percent.

 

A good chunk of the the move in equities this week has been simply short covering. It remains to be seen if real buyers decide to push markets higher. There needs to be a fundamental reason for that to happen. It could be a cessation of hostilities.

 

I still see a difficult first half of the year that will probably spill over into the summer. Sure, we can have relief rallies like we are in right now. But for me to become more bullish, I would need to see earnings bottom, inflation subside, and the Fed to stop tightening monetary policy. Don't hold your breath.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The economy is slowing. Inflation is climbing. Investors are worried that these trends appear to be a recipe for the "S" word.

 

The economic concept of stagflation where the witches' brew of a faltering economy, aided and abetted by skyrocketing inflation, harkens back to the malaise of the late 1970s. At that time, interest rates rose to nearly 20 percent. Inflation, as measured by the Consumer Price Index (CPI), reached an annual average of 13.5 percent by 1980. Oil prices (like today) surpassed $100 a barrel.

 

Blame for this period of stagflation fell squarely on OPEC, a newly formed energy cartel of oil producers, that decided to raise oil prices sharply after decades of artificially controlled suppressed prices by mostly Western nations and their energy producers.

 

Since energy is used in so many of the industrialized economies to produce just about everything, this oil shock reverberated throughout the economy. As costs rose, prices pushed higher causing more and more inflation (sound familiar). It didn't help that for the most part, monetary expansion was the name of the game throughout most of that decade.

 

Looking back, economic growth and unemployment in the 1970s was uneven at best with two recessions, one at the beginning of the decade, and another from 1973 through 1975.

 

It's not hard to point to the similarities between then and now.

 

Today, we are confronting similar supply shocks, which began during the pandemic and have since been amplified by the onset of the Ukrainian War. We have also been functioning under a highly expansionary monetary policy that has been in place since the financial crisis of 2008-2009. Where we differ today is in the areas of economic growth and employment. Neither qualify as coming even close to stagnation.

 

Proponents of stagflation would say that it is only a question of time before the economy slows and is in fact doing so as I write this. They would be right, at least in the short-term. Most economists expect this present quarter to register anemic growth. Yet, for the year 2022, the expected growth rate is still 3 percent and 2.3 percent for 2023.

 

However, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and the resulting sanctions may trigger recessions in both warring countries. Theses actions will also spill over to the European Community (EU) and directly impact its economies. It will also create even further supply chain obstacles and higher inflation.

 

One would expect that the U.S. economy will feel these impacts as well. The Conference Board estimates that these headwinds could cut as much as half a point or more from our growth rate.  On the unemployment front, we are nowhere near where we were in the 1970s. Right now, unemployment is at a low of 3.8 percent. And readers must remember that global economies are less energy intensive than they were back then. In a research report, UBS Wealth Management USA argued that "oil intensity of global GDP has dropped by 25 percent since 1990 (and by more than 50 percent since the early 1970s when oil price shocks caused recessions)."

 

However, what we don't know is what economic impact the Fed's intention to tighten monetary policy will have on the economy. Investors point to what happened when Federal Reserve Chair Paul Volcker addressed inflation back then. He raised interest rates to double-digit levels, drove inflation down, but also sent the economy into a deep recession. Could the Fed do that again?

 

I doubt that today's Fed will ignore the past and simply "do another Volcker." But make no mistake, the Fed is going to raise interest rates next Wednesday, March 16 by 25 basis points and likely raise rates again at the next two meetings. How will the markets handle that?

 

We are the lower end of the box on the S&P 500 Index (the lower end of that box is 4,310, give or take 20 points). I believe markets will continue to move on every headline between now and the FOMC meeting next Wednesday.  If I were a betting man, I would say markets like what Chair Jerome Powell has to say. In the meantime, stocks are managing to hold up and will continue to do so, barring a game changer in the Ukraine conflict.