Home About Archives RSS Feed

The Independent Investor: The Elephant in the Room

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires Columnist

Mid-term elections are less than two weeks away. Issues, for the most part, have fallen by the wayside as pure politics runs amuck. No wonder voter turnout is traditionally so poor in this midterm madness.

Republicans are running against an unpopular president and are expected to sweep both houses of Congress. All they have to do is keep the focus on President Obama while mobilizing their die-hard base.  That strategy appears to be highly effective so why worry about mundane things like issues? After all, if voters don't care, why should they?

Both parties' campaigns are now dictated by whatever voters are worrying about on a day-by-day basis.  The fear of an ebola pandemic plays well, while the ISIS terrorists are always good for a sound bite or two. The minimum wage, the Affordable Care Act, the economy; these are all given short shrift while the most pressing challenge of this generation barely receives a mention. I'm talking about income inequality.

Despite gaining over 2 million new jobs in the last year or two, income inequality has widened in the United States and is, in fact, accelerating. Our country now finishes dead last in income inequality when compared to all developed nations. The U.S. actually trails Mexico, Chile and Turkey (all emerging markets) when it comes to an equitable distribution of wealth among our citizens.

As this disgraceful and dangerous wealth gap widens, shouldn't we be looking to our lawmakers in these mid-term elections to address this problem? Unfortunately, that's like asking the fox to guard the henhouse.

The average wealth of a congressman is now above $750,000. In the Senate, it's even higher, at $2.6 million. That wealth is distributed among both parties. John Kerry, for example is worth $231 million, while Diane Feinstein, claims $69 million in assets and Frank Lautenberg is worth $85 million to name a few. Clearly our representatives are part of the problem.

The failure to address income inequality in this country is not confined to one or the other parties. Democrats are just as anxious to ignore the problem as are Republicans. It may surprise you that income inequality is actually higher in Democratic-controlled districts than in Republican ones. In the 35 districts with the highest income inequality in the country, Democrats represent 32 of those districts.

These 35 districts share some similar traits. They contain small, enormously wealthy elites surrounded by impoverished neighbors. Most are situated within urban areas such as Washington, Boston, New York, Chicago and Philadelphia. Here are some examples.

Income inequality in New York's 10th District, represented by Jerrold Nadler, a Democrat, is about equal to Haiti. Nancy Pelosi's California District 12 ranks on par with Bolivia. John Boehner's Ohio District has the same income inequality as Nigeria and Paul Ryan's Minnesota District 6 is as bad as Burundi's.

It gets worse. Our elected representatives have actually exacerbated the income inequality problem over the last 20 years. Two decades of federal spending and expanding regulation by both parties have spawned a growing elite class of federal contractors, lobbyists and lawyers in the D.C. area. Over $100 billion has been funneled into this area since 1989. Is it any wonder that 10 of the capital's surrounding counties in Virginia and Maryland place in the top 20 counties nationwide in household income? Manassas Park City, Craig County, and Bath County, all in Virginia, placed within the top 10 counties nationwide that ranked among the highest in income inequality in the nation.

At this point, about 15 cents of every dollar of the federal procurement budget stays in the DC area. That amounted to $80 billion out of $536 billion in 2010. Think of the monumental transfer of wealth that is occurring from 98 percent of taxpayers to fewer than 2 percent of the U.S. population. Those in the top 5 percent of income in our nation's hometown make 54 times the money that the bottom 20 percent receives.

All of this is being conveniently ignored by those campaigning for your vote. So when you pull that lever in November, remember these are the people you will be voting for - regardless of political party.

As the rich get richer, your share in the nation's wealth and income is falling lower and lower. Do not be swayed by the fear mongers. Ask yourself if voting for these clowns is in your best self-interest and that of America's generations to come. I sincerely doubt it.

If you want to keep up abreast of my most up-to-date articles follow me @afewdollarsmore or on Facebook at billsafewdollarsmore.

Bill Schmick is registered as an investment adviser representative with Berkshire Money Management. Bill’s forecasts and opinions are purely his own. None of the information presented here should be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. Direct inquires to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or email him at Bill@afewdollarsmore.com.

     

Support Local News

We show up at hurricanes, budget meetings, high school games, accidents, fires and community events. We show up at celebrations and tragedies and everything in between. We show up so our readers can learn about pivotal events that affect their communities and their lives.

How important is local news to you? You can support independent, unbiased journalism and help iBerkshires grow for as a little as the cost of a cup of coffee a week.

News Headlines
Cheshire Holds Off on Officers Until New Police Chief Hired
Pittsfield's Crosby/Conte Proposal Nearing Designer Selection
Downed Line Slows North Adams Traffic, Closes Restaurant
Clarksburg Sees Clearing Financial Skies for Fiscal 2027
Dalton Eyes New Software to Streamline Payroll
Pittsfield Panel Supports Councilors' Privacy, Lake Management Commission
Trifecta of Pittsfield School Projects Moving Forward
Dalton Passes Fiscal 2027 Budget, OKs Funds for Concrete Lawsuit
Voters Pick Newcomers in Adams, Cheshire Elections
North Adams Finance Committee Warned of Coming Sludge Costs
 
 


Categories:
@theMarket (577)
Independent Investor (452)
Retired Investor (291)
Archives:
May 2026 (1)
May 2025 (8)
April 2026 (9)
March 2026 (7)
February 2026 (8)
January 2026 (8)
December 2025 (8)
November 2025 (8)
October 2025 (10)
September 2025 (6)
August 2025 (8)
July 2025 (9)
June 2025 (8)
Tags:
Euro Taxes Europe Wall Street Metals Retirement Congress Election Interest Rates Federal Reserve Fiscal Cliff Greece Pullback Banks Crisis Currency Oil Debt Debt Ceiling Selloff Japan Markets Stimulus Bailout Mortgages Rally Economy Housing Stock Market Deficit Recession Stocks Energy Jobs Commodities
Popular Entries:
The Retired Investor: The Hawks Return
The Retired Investor: Has Labor Found Its Mojo?
The Retired Investor: Climate Change Is Costing Billions
The Retired Investor: Time to Hire an Investment Adviser?
The Retired Investor: Crypto Crashes (Again)
The Retired Investor: My Dog's Medical Bills Are Higher Than Mine
The Retired Investor: Food, Famine, and Global Unrest
The Retired Investor: Holiday Spending Expected to Stay Strong
The Retired Investor: U.S. Shale Producers Can't Rescue Us
The Retired Investor: Investors Should Take a Deep Breath
Recent Entries:
@theMarket: Oil Surged, and So Did the Markets
The Retired Investor: Tariff Refunds Leave Consumers Out — Again
@theMarket: Markets Consolidate Near Highs
The Retired Investor: Inflation and Wartime Economies
@theMarket: Stocks Rocket Higher in Historic Bull Run
The Retired Investor: America's Wartime Economy
@theMarket: World Markets Await Yet Another Weekend of Ceasefire Talks
The Retired Investor: Fish Prices Are Jumping
@theMarket: Stocks Held Hostage by Threats From Both Sides
The Retired Investor: Navigating the Unfriendly Skies