Home About Archives RSS Feed

The Independent Investor: Truth About NATO & Defense Spending

By Bill SchmickiBerkshires columnist
While it would appear that President Donald Trump left the London NATO Summit this week empty-handed, the truth is he has already achieved what several presidents before him could not. Unfortunately, it is a shallow victory at best.
 
Just a week ago, in preparation for President Trump's visit, the North Atlantic Treaty Organization announced a change in the funding of its budget. It agreed to reduce the United States' contribution to the alliance (now 22 percent) and redistribute the costs to other members. As a result, the U.S. and Germany will now pay the same amount. Each will contribute 16 percent of NATO's central budget.
 
The problem is that NATO's central budget, which only amounts to $2.5 billion annually, is just a drop in the bucket when thinking about the ongoing defense of Europe. The alliance was formed after World War II as a means to counter the Soviet Union's growing domination in Europe and the rest of the world.
 
The idea of a collective defense — "One for all and all for one" — was a good one at the time. The assumption was that each nation member would see to its own defense spending, while contributing to the direct budget of NATO, which was miniscule in comparison.
 
Over the decades since its founding, it became apparent that, with the exception of the United States, most of the 29 members of the alliance were not spending nearly enough on their own defense readiness. The issue came to a head by 2014 when the members agreed that they would increase their own defense spending to 2 percent of their Gross Domestic Product (GDP) no later than 2024. 
 
Therein lies the beef, since only nine members have reached that goal so far. In the meantime, the U.S. spends 3.4 percent of GDP on defense, which amounts to roughly 69 percent of overall defense spending among the NATO alliance. This year alone, the U.S. will spend $693 billion. That makes the amount members spend on the NATO budget mere peanuts in the grand scheme of things.
 
The 2014 agreement, however, is really a "paper tiger," since there is no penalty if a member fails to reach the 2 percent target. To be fair, most NATO members did increase defense spending this year, which makes it five years in a row. However, that was not nearly enough in President Trump's opinion.
 
"ALL NATO NATIONS must meet their 2 percent commitment, and that must ultimately go to 4 percent," was the tweeted message dictated to NATO by our commander-in-chief. That might be easier said than done, in my opinion. This week, the president has threatened additional tariffs on European imports if NATO members do not comply.
 
To be fair, our European allies are democracies and cannot simply up their defense spending without the agreement of their voters. At the same time, most Europeans have far less appetite for defense spending in general than Americans.
 
In addition, given Trump's overwhelming lack of popularity within European nations, it would be practically impossible for EU leaders to convince their citizens to increase defense spending based simply on Trump's demands. In fact, it is likely the opposite would occur.
 
That leaves one obvious avenue left to force a solution — threatened U.S. departure from NATO. The ramifications of such a move on Trump's part would go far beyond economics. I am sure that possibility is the stuff of nightmares that may keep our military establishment up at night. Many politicians on both sides of the aisle might also have a problem with such a move. And yet, I would not put it past this president to venture down that road, if only as a negotiating ploy to get some of what he wants.
 
Bill Schmick is registered as an investment adviser representative and portfolio manager with Berkshire Money Management (BMM), managing over $400 million for investors in the Berkshires.  Bill's forecasts and opinions are purely his own. None of the information presented here should be construed as an endorsement of BMM or a solicitation to become a client of BMM. Direct inquiries to Bill at 1-888-232-6072 (toll free) or email him at Bill@afewdollarsmore.com.
     

Support Local News

We show up at hurricanes, budget meetings, high school games, accidents, fires and community events. We show up at celebrations and tragedies and everything in between. We show up so our readers can learn about pivotal events that affect their communities and their lives.

How important is local news to you? You can support independent, unbiased journalism and help iBerkshires grow for as a little as the cost of a cup of coffee a week.

News Headlines
Adams Designates Areas Along Route 8 As Blighted
Pittsfield Council Preview: Councilor Privacy & Halting Berkshire Gas Work Permits
Veteran Spotlight: Navy Lt. Dan White
Mount Greylock School Committee OKs Budget Without Adding Elementary School Position
Growth of Girls Basketball Reflected in County Hall of Fame Inductees
Williamstown Group Planning July 3 Festivities in South Williamstown
Legislative Breakfast in Pittsfield Voices Human Service Needs
Dalton Division Road Sewer Line Questioned
Youth for the Future: Jonah Sanabria
Lanesborough Officials Clarify Relationship with Firemen's Association
 
 


Categories:
@theMarket (572)
Independent Investor (452)
Retired Investor (285)
Archives:
March 2026 (6)
March 2025 (2)
February 2026 (8)
January 2026 (8)
December 2025 (8)
November 2025 (8)
October 2025 (10)
September 2025 (6)
August 2025 (8)
July 2025 (9)
June 2025 (8)
May 2025 (10)
April 2025 (8)
Tags:
Wall Street Retirement Bailout Banks Oil Currency Pullback Markets Debt Europe Economy Stocks Housing Stimulus Euro Debt Ceiling Metals Commodities Japan Federal Reserve Interest Rates Deficit Congress Energy Rally Selloff Fiscal Cliff Greece Stock Market Election Crisis Taxes Recession Jobs Mortgages
Popular Entries:
The Retired Investor: The Hawks Return
The Retired Investor: Has Labor Found Its Mojo?
The Retired Investor: Climate Change Is Costing Billions
The Retired Investor: Time to Hire an Investment Adviser?
The Retired Investor: Crypto Crashes (Again)
The Retired Investor: My Dog's Medical Bills Are Higher Than Mine
The Retired Investor: Food, Famine, and Global Unrest
The Retired Investor: Holiday Spending Expected to Stay Strong
The Retired Investor: U.S. Shale Producers Can't Rescue Us
The Retired Investor: Investors Should Take a Deep Breath
Recent Entries:
@theMarket: Stocks Battered by 1-2 Punch of Inflation, Higher Energy Costs
The Retired Investor: Is Cuba Next?
@theMarket: Iran War Trashes Markets
The Retired Investor: Are Predictions Markets Displacing Crypto Trading?
@theMarket: Wartime Energy Prices Sink Markets
The Retired Investor: Refresher on Geopolitical Events & the Stock Market
@theMarket: Bellweather Stocks Fail to Support Markets
The Retired Investor: Will Historic Winter Weather Disrupt the Economy?
@theMarket: Investors Await Direction, As Stocks Churn
The Retired Investor: What Is Gunboat Diplomacy Without Boats?