Senate Passes Education Reform Legislation

Print Story | Email Story
BOSTON – State Senator Benjamin B. Downing (D-Pittsfield) announces the Massachusetts Senate passed an innovative education reform bill on Tuesday that establishes a new category of public schools, provides options to improve existing school districts that are underperforming, and puts the Commonwealth in better position to secure federal funds to help all public schools in Massachusetts.

“This bill places the Commonwealth in the best position for federal Race to the Top funds,” said Downing. “It encourages innovation in school districts and equips underperforming schools with the tools they need to help students achieve. Ultimately, this puts our education system on the path to better serving all Massachusetts students.”

During the Senate debate, Downing spoke on behalf of a successful amendment stipulating regional school transportation payments made by the state in any fiscal year through the General Appropriations Act shall not be lowered by a greater percentage than any reduction made to state Chapter 70 payments in the same fiscal year. In his remarks Downing pointed to the Governor’s recent $20 million FY 2010 9C funding reduction of the Chapter 71 regional school transportation line item account which is dramatically affecting the operating budgets of regional school systems across western Massachusetts.

An Act Relative To Education Reform (S. 2205) creates Innovation Schools, which are district public schools with increased autonomy and flexibility to operate. Any school, in any district, may take advantage of this new model, and the funding of these schools is the same as for any other school in the district.

Any groups or individuals can submit proposals for innovation schools and approval depends on collaborative evaluation by the school committees, teachers union and superintendent.

The bill also addresses “underperforming” and “chronically underperforming” schools by authorizing the commissioner of elementary and secondary education to intervene and work with school superintendents to develop turnaround plans for those schools.

Plans can be approved for up to three years. Upon expiration of the plan, the commissioner will review the school and decide whether the school has improved sufficiently, requires further improvement or has failed to improve at all. If no improvement has occurred, the commissioner can take steps to institute dramatic turn around.

Schools that score in the lowest 20 percent in the statewide Composite Performance Index are designated as either underperforming or chronically underperforming. No more than 5 percent of the state’s schools can have either designation at any given time.

A final piece of the bill removes the cap that limits the state’s total charter school population to 4 percent. It also raises the state spending cap for charter schools from 9 to 18 percent of net school spending in the lowest 10 percent performing districts.

The legislation requires charter schools to develop recruitment and retention plans which include annual goals and specific strategies to attract, enroll and retain low-income, special-education, limited-English, and sub-proficient students.

All the changes provided in the legislation strengthen the Commonwealth’s ability to compete for federal “Race to the Top” grant money worth $150 million to $250 million which represents a one-time-only opportunity to maintain and improve our education system, especially in these tough fiscal times when budgets are being slashed and programs are being cut.

The application deadline for these funds – January 19, 2010 – is fast approaching, and the Senate’s vote puts Massachusetts one step closer to obtaining these funds. The bill now goes to the House of Representatives for further action.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to Dissolve Baker Hill Road District

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board is looking to move forward with dissolving the Baker Hill Road District, which is hindering the Berkshire Mall sale.

On Friday, the Select Board heard from Vice Chair Juli Baker and Chair Deborah Maynard on how Tuesday negotiations went with Cypress Equities, JMJ Holdings, town counsel, the town administrator, and state Rep. John Barrett III. 

Baker said that during Tuesday's meeting, everyone agreed the goal was to have a successful sale of the mall for redevelopment as it’s in the best interest of the town.

Baker said Barrett assured them the state is willing to take the Connector Road and that the state is willing to provide grants to the town to renovate the water and sewer infrastructure, with an estimated total of $4.5 million, to facilitate the property's redevelopment.

"We have received assurances from Representative Barrett that the Commonwealth will provide the monies and will take the Connector," Baker said.

While buyer Cypress Equities saw some benefit in keeping the district, it now doesn't since the state is willing to provide the funds and renovate the infrastructure, according to Baker. 

Baker said that in the meeting, Cypress Equities prefers to enter into a tax increment financing (TIF) and will add to the agreement an amount of funding for public safety services, which would have come from the district. She said Cypress said it would rather enter into one agreement with the town than two agreements with the town and the district.

Mall owner JMJ Holdings is willing to pay $350,000 to the town upon closing, Baker said. 

The meeting Friday was to consider moving forward with a dissolution of the district.

"But the decision that it hinges on tonight is whether to move forward to the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District in some manner," she said.

Baker said she has worked long and hard to see if there was another alternative to this, working closely with the district which has been "very cooperative and very helpful" in making changes.

The district had agreed to make changes to its governance and taxation; agreeing to have a cap for Cypress as well as agreeing to work to have the state take over the road, sending letters of support.

"What changed this for me is that I've always said it's important to have the special district because we get the public safety funding, and it's also important for the economic district to bring the features that an economic district brings because of what we're up against with the infrastructure problems, and the change at this point is that we have a buyer who is willing to supply that public safety money and commit to it over time, along with the TIF that the town would do, which is essential," she said.

"At this point, I feel like it's in the best interest of the town and protects the town the best in terms of a future where we can develop a mall and bring that economic benefit in. You definitely need to reduce taxes, and you cannot do that without a fully developed retail operation right there. So it's been, you know, deeply difficult decision making," Baker said.

Board members Jason Breault and Jeffery Walters agreed it was the best decision to move forward.

View Full Story

More State Stories