image description
Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio has asked for an investigation into why more people aren't taking advantage of the homeless shelter at St. Joe's.

Advocates Concerned for Pittsfield Unsheltered as Winter Deepens

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Tents sprang up around the city this past summer.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — As 2020 drew to an end, around 70 individuals remained unsheltered or housing insecure in Pittsfield as winter weather descends on the county. 
 
"I don't believe our homeless are being well taken care of, I believe the city is painting a pretty picture when there's not one there," Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio said. "People are treating these individuals like a pack of wild animals and not like human beings, and I have an issue with that."
 
Local homelessness advocates say the city needs to take a different approach to aid the unsheltered population.
 
At the time of Pittsfield's last City Council meeting, non-profit Western Massachusetts Recovery Learning Community reported that 72 individuals in the city were currently unsheltered. This number included people tenting throughout Pittsfield, sleeping in empty buildings, sleeping in cars, and those who are couch surfing.
 
County coordinator Jean-Marie Laurin said this number hasn't changed drastically since.
 
Some suggested actions include utilizing collaboration, investigating claims made about ServiceNet's shelter at the former St. Joseph's High School, providing a warming shelter for daytime hours when the shelter is not open, adopting trauma-informed care, and using a "Housing First" model approach with the end goal of providing permanent supported housing to these individuals.
 
"So much of it is just letting folks know that they have someone to listen, and someplace safe and warm to be," Laurin said.
 
Maffuccio has not been happy with the progress that his petition calling for the investigation of abuse and human rights violations at ServiceNet's shelter has made since the last council meeting.
 
He said things are moving slowly, and it seems that the city does not want to go down that path because ServiceNet is its only shelter provider.
 
"There has to be an obvious reason on why at least 70 individuals are living in the wilderness when there are beds available," Maffuccio said.  
 
Volunteer homelessness advocate Regina White is on a first-name basis with many of these unsheltered folks. While assisting them over the summer, she said she was surprised to learn they hadn't been advised to fill out permanent housing applications by ServiceNet's shelter at St. Joe, which was then closed. White was able to help them submit nearly 82 applications to the city.
 
White commended Western Mass RLC, which raised more than $13,000 for survival gear to support those displaced by the closing of ServiceNet's shelter over the summer, opened its doors to the unsheltered population so they can have a warm place to relax and to use a computer, and give them assistance with various forms of paperwork.
 
The RLC, which is in an accessible location on North Street, is currently open Wednesdays through Fridays, though somewhat limited in access by COVID-19 restrictions.
 
Since securing funds to provide unsheltered folks with tenting equipment during the warmer months, Laurin and RLC team have been since focusing on assisting them with important paperwork from entities such as the Department of Transitional Assistance, Social Security, apartment searches, personal identifications, and birth certificates.
 
"We're a fairly small organization just doing a lot," Laurin said.
 
Laurin is more than disappointed that the city has not provided a warming shelter yet. In early December, Mayor Linda Tyer announced that the final elements of a daytime warming center at the Christian Center are being put into place, but it has not come to fruition yet.
 
"This is something that should have happened back in June, we knew winter was coming," Laurin said.
 
The RLC, along with other advocates, is more than concerned about the multifaceted homeless crises that have exploded in Pittsfield. Laurin said the immediate crunch is the fact that temperatures are dropping, there are reports of abuse and misconduct at the reopened St. Joe's shelter, there is a lack of transparency and accountability over whether these claims are true or not, and there is no warming shelter.
 
"I would like to say that trauma-based care would just be common sense," Laurin said. "But I think you're looking at an entire system of exhausted people and I think we could be doing a lot better."

Tags: homeless,   

2 Comments
iBerkshires.com welcomes critical, respectful dialogue; please keep comments focused on the issues and not on personalities. Profanity, obscenity, racist language and harassment are not allowed. iBerkshires reserves the right to ban commenters or remove commenting on any article at any time. Concerns may be sent to info@iberkshires.com.

MassWildlife Asks Public Not to Feed 'GE Deer'

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — If you have ever driven down New York Avenue and seen the deer grazing behind the fencing that encases General Electric's property, it is likely that you have been inclined to feed them.

Though this action is rooted in kindness, it is not healthy for the woodland friends and could be fatal, which is why MassWildlife has put up signs asking that residents do not throw food over the fences.

"Obviously, people see the deer in there and they probably think 'what are they going to eat? They're limited in there they're stuck in there.'  I will say, they're definitely not stuck in there," MassWildlife's wildlife biologist Nathan Buckhout said.

For decades, the deer have found an unlikely sanctuary in the former GE site that includes two landfills, Hill 78 and Building 71. Buckhout explained that they have been there for decades, spawning offspring and becoming completely self-sufficient within the fenced area.

"They're doing just fine," he said. "And they obviously are getting enough food and water, otherwise their population would be limited, they wouldn't be able to produce their offspring so there would be fewer fawns, and eventually they probably would have disappeared — but they haven't."

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories