Williamstown Planners Suggesting Numerous Changes to Zoning Bylaw

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — At the outset of its most the recent meeting, the Planning Board's chair suggested that it take a number of zoning bylaw amendment proposals out of order, moving a heavily discussed proposal to reduce residential lot sizes to the end and first dispensing with what he characterized as the "least controversial" items on the board's plate.
 
One hour, 20 minutes later, they got to the proposal about lot size dimensions.
 
At the end of the nearly three-hour meeting, two things were clear: The Planning Board has been dealing with complex issues throughout the last nine months, and May's annual town meeting, where any bylaw changes need to be approved, could be a long one.
 
When Chris Winters, the chair, opened the discussion about bylaw amendments back in June, he was clear that he believed Chapter 70, the portion of the town code dealing with residential development, needed an overhaul. And he signaled that he would be pushing for significant — if incremental — changes to open up more potential for different housing types and more housing units in the town of 7,500.
 
Though town meeting still is three months out, the clock starts ticking soon for the public notice and hearing deadlines that the Planning Board must meet in order to get any articles on the meeting warrant.
 
At its January and February meetings, the board advanced most of the proposals before it to the drafting stage, though not always unanimously.
 
Last Tuesday, it OK'd most of the "least controversial" proposals that Winters optimistically hoped to move through quickly, though one passed on a 3-2 vote and another was withdrawn by Winters after he was swayed by a colleague's argument.
 
What resulted were six proposed bylaw amendments that the board will review and, potentially, send off to the Select Board for inclusion on the town meeting warrant at its special meeting this Thursday at 7 p.m.
 
As is noted every year at this time, the initial step of sending the articles to the Select Board for its Feb. 28 meeting is largely ceremonial and highly procedural.
 
The articles will then come back to the Planning Board, which will hold at least one public hearing on the proposal in the spring. The Select Board itself will have the opportunity to weigh in with advisory votes on each of the six articles at some point in April or early May.
 
The Planning Board will be able to make minor changes to the warrant articles coming out of the public hearings, but the proposals need to be substantially consistent with the drafts that get printed in a newspaper in the days leading up to the public hearing.
 
Ultimately, all residents who attend the annual town meeting will have the opportunity once again speak for or against the proposals before each is subject to vote. Longtime meeting members will note that these bylaw amendments, unlike past changes to the town code, will require a simple majority for passage at the meeting; a state law signed last year allows zoning changes that are specifically designed to increase housing opportunities to pass town meeting (or a city council) with simple majorities instead of the two-thirds vote they required in the past.
 
Last Tuesday, when the board started digging into some of the "less controversial" proposals, two members of the five-person panel pushed for tabling any potential warrant articles beyond those the board advanced in January.
 
"If we add any more warrant articles than we already have on our plate, we just can't get them done," Stephanie Boyd said. "I think we should just go with working on completing the work to ready the articles we discussed last week and not add any more to it. Any article we add adds more work to redraft, more work to present to the public, more work to do some analysis."
 
Roger Lawrence agreed, saying the board has done no case studies to assess how the changes it is proposing will play out in the real world.
 
A proposed change to Chapter 70-8.4 was one of several specific sticking points that came up at Tuesday's meeting.
 
In his comprehensive review of the zoning bylaw, Winters found a clause in the requirement for special permits for new construction that reads, "Providing adequate water, sewerage and drainage for this location should pose no unusual public problems, and preferably would not result in utility extension past undeveloped parcels."
 
Winters argued that it is counterproductive for the town to actively discourage extension of the water and sewer line for new homes and, in fact, extending them is better for sanitation purposes and cost-sharing by current users of the system.
 
He suggested language that allows the Zoning Board of Appeals (the special permit granting body) to consider the need for extending the lines but does not suggest the town prefers them not to be extended.
 
"If someone owns a lot that's 200 yards beyond the [sewer] line, what we're currently suggesting to the Zoning Board is that they should look askance at that," Winters said. "In so doing, we're suppressing – at the margin, again, this is all marginal – we're suppressing slightly the opportunity for new housing supply."
 
The suggestion prompted a lengthy discussion that included questions from the board about whether the Hoosic Water Quality District sewage treatment facility could handle "marginally more" homes. Community Development Director Andrew Groff advised the board that facility was built to serve North Adams and Williamstown in the late 1970s, when North Adams had 20,000 residents, as opposed to the current population of 13,000
 
In the end, the board voted 5-0 to propose Winters' less restrictive language, but the vote came with a caveat.
 
"I'll vote yes, but I want to reiterate on all of these motions, I need more information," Boyd said. "I'll say yes, let's move it along, but I need to know more about what the impact of this might be, and I want to hear from our constituents.
 
"I want to make it clear it's not going to be easy sailing at our next meeting."
 
That meeting is scheduled to be held remotely via Zoom at 7 p.m. on Thursday and will be telecast on the town's community access television station, Willinet.

Tags: zoning,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Accepts Williams' $2M Bid for 59 Water St.

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires.com
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday voted 4-1 to  accept a revised offer from Williams College to purchase the former town garage site at four times the original upfront offer.
 
The college's original response to the town's request for proposals for 59 Water St. proposed that the school acquire the vacant lot for an upfront purchase price of $500,000 plus 10 years of $50,000 contributions to the Mount Greylock Regional School District.
 
On Monday night, Williams' director of communications presented a revised offer: the original $500,000 purchase price plus an additional $1.5 million contribution to the town, paid in a lump sum at the time of closing.
 
In addition to doubling the effective purchase price ($2 million versus the $1 million over 10 years), the new offer addresses a concern raised by members of the Select Board at its first public consideration of the college's proposal: the fact that $50,000 in 2036 is not the same as $50,000 in 2026.
 
The college's Gina Puc noted that the $500,000 purchase price alone is anywhere from a third more to double the lot's appraised value, depending on which appraisal you look at, a sum she characterized as "reasonable, even generous."
 
"After consideration and listening to the good conversation at the last Select Board meeting, we've decided to revise our offer, so we'll make a one-time payment of $1.5 million to the town at closing," Puc said. "This is in place of the $50,000 payment to the local schools.
 
"We're responding to some of the feedback we heard — one, to really compensate for lost tax revenue on the site for this being converted from what was, potentially, a commercial lot and, in addition, listening to feedback about having this go to the town instead of the schools."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories