City Council Establishes Pittsfield's Water and Sewer Rates

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The City Council on Tuesday approved a 10 percent increase in water rates and a 12 percent increase in sewer rates per year for fiscal years 2022 and 2023.

They were passed in a 6-4 vote with Councilor at Large Karen Kalinowsky, Ward 1 Councilor Kenneth Warren, Ward 2 Councilor Charles Kronick, and Ward 7 Councilor Anthony Maffuccio opposing.  Ward 5 Councilor Patrick Kavey was absent.

Mayor Linda Tyer’s original proposal was to increase the water rates by 12 percent and the sewer rates by 15 percent but the finance subcommittee in February made a recommendation for the reduced rates that the council supported.

At the last council meeting, a charter objection by Kronick halted the vote to establish the rates after two hours of debate.

With these rates, a two-bathroom home will see an increase of about $77 annually in the fiscal year 2022, and a metered household that uses 220 gallons of water a day will annually pay about $65 more.

They are retroactively effective Jan. 1, 2022, and support the water and sewer enterprise, debt service for capital projects, fund increases in salaries and expenses for utility system operations, and build retained earnings.

Maffuccio reiterated his concern for the raise because Pittsfield is already a "poor area" with many elderly and disabled residents. He also pointed to the hardships that people have faced because of the pandemic and the recent rise in gas prices.

"I have a lot of elderly people that I represent, I have a lot of blue-collar, family working people that I represent who have to work two, three jobs," he said.

"My job is being dedicated to them, I'm not being cowardly, I'm not sitting here saying that I wouldn't do it next year, I'm not sitting here saying, 'You know, sometimes that's what we get paid for, to make the hard votes, it’s a tough decision somebody's got to do it.' What about having some compassion? Don't we at some point in time have to have compassion? You tell me, what have we done for our city residents to give them compassion and help them along on the recovery of a pandemic?"

Kronick believes the solution to not raising the tax rate is using American Rescue Plan Act (ARPA) funds. He queried Tyer on the matter, who insisted that it is in the city's best interest to use the funds for capital expenditures and not for operating costs.

A new provision in the final rule from the U.S. Department of Treasury allows municipalities to use a standard allowance of up to $10 million for revenue loss. This is an alternative to the previous revenue loss calculation formula that was laid out by the Treasury.


Pittsfield has selected the standard allowance because the amount claimed under revenue loss can be used for general government services.

"We opted for the standard deduction by taking the $10 million but we have not programmed how we're going to use that money and I would suggest that it is not in the city's best interest to use those funds for operating costs," Tyer said.

"One time infusions of funds such as the American rescue plan including the lost revenue should be used for capital expenditures to advance the future of our city so for example, we are using $7 [million] or $8 million to be budgeted for repairs to the Ashley Reservoir and the dam, so we feel strongly that these funds should not be used for recurring operating expenses, it's not going to solve the problem in the long run that we have in front of us now, so we really feel strongly that capital expenditures are the best use of the American Rescue Plan funds."

Kronick suggested using $1 million of the ARPA funds and applying them to expenses and Tyer reiterated her stance.

"I do not think that's the best solution which is why we didn't propose it. What happens when we no longer have a million dollars to put towards water and sewer rates? What happens is that it just prolongs the impact to the ratepayers," she said.

"Our proposal offers a phased approach that eases the cost and the burden of funding the operations of water and sewer, we don't believe we should be using American Rescue Plan money for operations because all it does is create a structural problem in the long run when we no longer have that money to fund the operations."

President Peter Marchetti eventually discontinued Kronick’s line of questioning, saying he had asked the question and Tyer had answered it.

During the conversation, water meters were commonly called for so that residents can save money on their bills. Councilor at Large Pete White asked Commissioner of Public Services and Utilities Ricardo Morales if the city would have to raise the same amount of money if everyone had a water meter and he confirmed that it would.

The rates were last increased in 2019 when residents saw a 10 percent water increase and a 50 percent sewer increase.  

The staggering sewer increase was a part of Tyer's plan to pay for a $74 million wastewater treatment project. The city has been under an administrative order from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to lower the levels of phosphorous and aluminum in the water coming out of the plant.


Tags: sewer rates,   water rates,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Board Signs Off on Land Sale Over Residents' Objections

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff

Residents demanded the right to speak but the agenda did not include public comment. Amy Musante holds a sign saying the town now as '$20,000 less for a police station.'
DALTON, Mass. — The Select Board signed the sale on the last of what had been known as the Bardin property Monday even as a handful of residents demanded the right to speak against the action. 
 
The quitclaim deed transfers the nine acres to Thomas and Esther Balardini, who purchased the two other parcels in Dalton. They were the third-highest bidders at $31,500. Despite this, the board awarded them the land in an effort to keep the property intact.
 
"It's going to be an ongoing battle but one I think that has to be fought [because of] the disregard for the taxpayers," said Dicken Crane, the high bidder at $51,510.
 
"If it was personal I would let it go, but this affects everyone and backing down is not in my nature." 
 
Crane had appealed to the board to accept his bid during two previous meetings. He and others opposed to accepting the lower bid say it cost the town $20,000. After the meeting, Crane said he will be filing a lawsuit and has a citizen's petition for the next town meeting with over 100 signatures. 
 
Three members of the board — Chair Robert Bishop Jr., John Boyle, and Marc Strout — attended the 10-minute meeting. Members Anthony Pagliarulo and Daniel Esko previously expressed their disapproval of the sale to the Balardinis. 
 
Pagliarulo voted against the sale but did sign the purchase-and-sale agreement earlier this month. His reasoning was the explanation by the town attorney during an executive session that, unlike procurement, where the board is required to accept the lowest bid for services, it does have some discretion when it comes to accepting bids in this instance.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories