Letter: Proposed Zoning Changes in Williamstown

To the Editor:

I am concerned about the Williamstown Planning Board's approach with proposed zoning changes. I have lived in Williamstown for 30 years and I have attended town meeting for the majority of those years. I have followed the board's process this year, and I share their vision for a more inclusive and diverse Williamstown. In addition, I am working to support Williamstown's commitment to net-zero carbon emissions, and care for the planet.

I have observed that land-use changes that are successful at town meeting are developed and refined through a process of community education and engagement including active outreach, identification of community concerns, and response to those concerns. I have observed that proposals that are not successful are those that are complex, or where there is low community education and awareness. It is my belief that the board has not done its due diligence in studying the benefit of proposed zoning changes, educating the community on the arguments for why they will be helpful, and listening to and responding to concerns of community members about the changes.

I am concerned that the proposed changes in our rural residential zone, RR2, do not conform to basic principles of good planning to prevent sprawl, and I have no confidence that they will produce the stated intended benefit: more accessibility to housing in RR2 by low to moderate income individuals. Smart Growth principles are widely recognized as having many benefits. These principles include "Preserve open space, farmland, natural beauty, and critical environmental areas" and "Strengthen and direct development towards existing communities." In addition, large lot zoning in rural areas has been identified as an important and effective strategy for mitigating the harmful effects of residential development in previously undeveloped areas. They limit residential sprawl that may destroy or fragment existing wildlife habitat, preservation, and agricultural lands in rural areas. I'm alarmed to see some residents calling for the abolition of RR2 as part of what I see as a hurried and haphazard process.

If we as a community believe that creating low- to moderate-income housing in rural parts of Williamstown is a priority, that conversation should not be rushed. We should precisely study and research the best way to do this that will minimize environmental impact and increase the likelihood of success. We should recognize that the need for septic systems will increase development costs, and that distance from town will create impacts for residents who may have transportation challenges. We should look at our infrastructure, water supplies, and critical habitats and farmland, and make use of overlay districts to ensure housing is clustered in already developed areas.

Wendy Penner
Williamstown, Mass. 

New Ashford Fire Department Puts New Truck into Service

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
07:35AM / Sunday, May 05, 2024

New Ashford Fire Department Chaplain J.D. Hebert gives an invocation on Saturday morning.

NEW ASHFORD, Mass. — With a blessing from its chaplain and a ceremonial dousing from a fire hose, the New Ashford Volunteer Fire Department on Saturday christened its first new apparatus in two decades.

 

The company purchased a 2003 HME Central States pumper from the town of Pelham earlier this year.

 

On Saturday, the department held a brief ceremony during which Chaplain J.D. Hebert blessed both the new engine and the company's turnout gear.

 

After the apparatus was sprayed with a hose, a handful of New Ashford's bravest helped push it as it was backed into the station on Ingraham Road.

 

Fire Chief Frank Speth said the new engine has a 1,500 gallon pump and carries 1,000 gallons of water. And it replaces a truck that was facing some costly repairs to keep on the road.

 

"We had a 1991 Spartan," Speth said. "When we had the pump tested, it needed about $40,000 worth of repairs. Being it's almost 30 years old, I said to the town, 'We put the $40,000 in, but then how many more years can we get out of it?'

 

"Once you get into the pump situation, you get into, 'This needs to be done, and this needs to be done,' and it could be more than $40,000. So do we want to spend that amount of money to repair that engine or get something that will replace it."