Pittsfield School Restructuring Study Survey Opening to Community

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — School officials want to make certain that the entire community has a voice in the Pittsfield Public Schools restructuring process.

With a series of public hearings and an online survey completed, the School Building Needs Commission requested input from people who are not students, parents, or teachers.

Drummey, Rosane, and Anderson (DRA) Architects, the firm conducting the study, will be reformatting the survey to include the general public and will be reopening it for the summer. Once released, there will be outreach to generate as many responses as possible.

School Committee Chair William Cameron said not receiving feedback from a lot of people who may be affected by the process is an "educational and political" issue.

"I'm worried that in some sense, we're poisoning the well of what we are at work doing here and that it would subject us, even if people have been invited and don't participate, to accusations that we're only listening to a certain segment of the community," he said.

"And I don't know what to do about that but it's a concern that I have."

William Travis no longer has a child in the Pittsfield schools and was not able to take the survey, and that he had promoted it to groups that mostly consisted of seniors and they were not able to take it.

Travis asked that the survey is re-advertised so that the perception of non-school community members not participating can be changed.

Kathy Amuso agreed.

"You would have to do some re-education because I went on and I wouldn't go on again because I don't have children in the schools either so it didn't fit my needs," she said.

There were four opportunities for the public to weigh in on the study between in-person, virtual, and multilingual hearings at the end of May and the beginning of June.

A survey generated 416 parent and guardian responses, 385 responses from students Grades 3-12, and 364 responses from teachers.

Morningside Community and Crosby Elementary schools had the lowest responses due to lack of access to computers.



Parents felt that the district's classrooms, gyms, playgrounds, and locations were the best features.  Students said the PPS teachers and gym were the best features. Overall, the grounds were given a 6.27 out of ten rating and the safety was given a 6.78 out of ten rating.

Throughout the first stages of public input, some strengths and weaknesses have been identified.

The district's strengths include strong learning environments, a good disbursement of schools throughout the city, long-standing teachers and families, and the fact that students are generally happy with the buildings.

Weaknesses include undesirable support spaces, inadequate playgrounds, buildings that are not fully modernized, and buildings that need renovation.

There were also threats identified, which includes declining enrollment, a feeling that nobody will listen to feedback, a lack of local funding, and people not wanting to be a part of the solution.  

According to enrollment data, Pittsfield High School has 663 students with 24 percent of them on individualized education plans and Taconic has 837 students with 20 percent on IEPs.  Together, the high schools have 1,500 students and 21 percent are on IEPs.

Herberg Middle School has 488 students with 18 percent on IEPs and Reid Middle School has 458 students with 22 percent on IEPs.  Together, the middle schools have 946 students with 20 percent on IEPs.

With the same enrollment and IEP percentage for the elementary schools, Egremont Elementary has the largest population of 346 and Capeless Elementary has the least with 178 students.

"Our next real phase of this is to start thinking about some options here as to, given the data, given the issues that have been identified, what are some of the possible scenarios going forward," DRA representatives Carl Franceschi explained.

Throughout the summer, the committee is asked to consider school locations, travel times, grade alignment, school enrollment sizes, cohort class sizes and the number of transitions, and educational continuity.

DRA's next steps are to reopen the online survey, meet with curriculum leaders, compare the existing building to the Massachusetts School Building Authority guidelines, do a complete demographic and enrollment study, and test fit curriculum and enrollment into existing buildings.


Tags: Pittsfield Public Schools,   survey,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee Sees Budget Calendar, Chapter 70 Concerns

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Pittsfield Public Schools kicked off its fiscal year 2027 budget calendar, and are again facing uncertainties with state Chapter 70 funding. 

During the first meeting of the new term on Wednesday, the School Committee OK'd an FY27 budget calendar that plans the committee's vote in mid-April. Interim Superintendent Latifah Phillips stressed the importance of equity in this process. 

"It's really important for us through these next couple of months to look at our different schools, our different needs, different student demographics, and really understand, are we just assigning resources equally, or are we really assigning them based on what different groups of students need?" she said. 

The district could lose up to $5 million in Chapter 70 funding from declining enrollment, specifically of low-income students. This is a similar issue that PPS saw in 2024, when the discovery of 11 students meeting those income guidelines put the district in the higher funding category and added $2.4 million to the school budget. 

"We are in a funding category, Group 11, for a district with a large percentage of low-income students, and that number could fluctuate depending on who exited the district," Phillips explained. 

"So we're going to do our best to understand that, but ultimately, these numbers will impact the budget that is proposed to us by the governor." 

According to the budget calendar, a draft budget will be presented in March, followed by a hearing in early April, and the School Committee is set to vote on the budget in mid-April. The City Charter requires it to be adopted before May 1, and a meeting with the City Council must occur no later than May 31. 

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Bonnie Howland provided an overview of the Chapter 70 funding and budget process. The budget calendar, she said, is designed to really support transparency, coordination, and legal compliance. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories