Krol 'Moving On' From Money Accusations After More Charges Found

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayoral candidate John Krol says he is done addressing allegations of improperly spending a nonprofit cat rescue's funds after more charges against the account were discovered by The Berkshire Eagle.

Four of the charges were attempted business excise tax payments and were found in documents that Krol provided the newspaper in order to "clear his name."

"There are very powerful interests in this city that do not want me to be mayor," he said on his podcast earlier this week, later stating that he is moving on from the situation and will no longer be speaking to The Eagle about it.

On Sept. 20, The Eagle published allegations that Krol used nearly $7,000 from the Animal Dreams cat rescue account to pay off a credit card over several months. Stacey Carver, leader of nonprofit cat rescue Animal Dreams, went to paper with text messages, bank statements, and email exchanges she said showed $6,800 was taken from the nonprofit's account through five separate transfers in 2019.

The mayoral candidate served on the board from 2013 to 2018 and had been an officiary of the account.

Krol took to Facebook Live to rebut the allegations, attributing it to a "banking error" on Greylock Federal Credit Union's part for providing him with the wrong account number and called the story an "absolute unadulterated political hit piece."

He also addressed the allegation of never working off his debt to Carver's ex-husband Allan Harris, owner of Berkshire Money Management, after he cut him a check to cover the monies that were spent out of the Animal Dreams account. Krol said there was no understanding that it had to be paid back.

He provided documents that he said cleared his name and went to The Berkshire Eagle's office for a long meeting last week.  

The materials that Krol shared included a sixth payment to his business account from the nonprofit and, upon further investigation, The Eagle reported it found four additional attempts from the Animal Dreams account to pay a yearly $456 business excise tax to the state Department of Revenue for the 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 tax years. The state rejected each payment because it was from the nonprofit's account and not Krol's.


This adds up to 10 transactions from or attempted from the Animal Dreams account.

Some of the documents were provided to iBerkshires last week but were incomplete and no conclusions could be drawn from them regarding any new charges. One document was an image of an email from a Greylock Federal employee responding to Krol's reference to a "business checking account" with the checking account number of the nonprofit. 

Krol told The Eagle that use of the account for his excise taxes was news to him and has maintained that he did no wrongdoing, saying there was no malintent. He could not recall how his business OneEighty Media's excise taxes were paid but insisted that they were.

On his podcast that was posted to Facebook Live, he said he walked into The Eagle with good faith and was hoping to clear the air but instead, he was grilled over new information that he knew nothing about.

"They weren't payments because those payments were actually rejected," he said.

"And they were in the DOR system so year after year, they continue to glitch and that number wasn't used so there was no payment so the idea that it was for more payments is not accurate. There was not a payment made."

He could not answer why that account number was used in scheduling the payment.  

Krol had originally promised documentation from his then accountant Barry Clairmont, husband of Mayor Linda Tyer, during the in-person interview but then denied permission for the paper to speak to Clairmont next day, The Eagle reported.

On his podcast, Krol said he is "moving on," claiming that there were all kinds of other accusations made during this meeting and that it "didn't seem fair at all." He had originally threatened to seek legal action for defamation after the first story was published one day after the preliminary election that secured him a place on the general election ballot.

"We are going to move forward, we are going to run our campaign, and we're moving on from this issue and there's not going to be any more communication on the issue with Berkshire Eagle," he said.

"Because I don't think people want to hear it. They want to hear about the ideas right that we have."

Krol said that under his administration, Pittsfield will be the "most transparent financial city" with a new finance director from outside of the city and an outside auditor.

"We are the campaign that is talking about fiscal transparency and I think that's exactly what people may not like because there are a lot of people who are in positions of power in this community who really like the status quo," he said.

"So when you talk about change, when you talk about real change, there seems to be consequences for that including these hit pieces from The Berkshire Eagle."

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories