Krol 'Moving On' From Money Accusations After More Charges Found

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Mayoral candidate John Krol says he is done addressing allegations of improperly spending a nonprofit cat rescue's funds after more charges against the account were discovered by The Berkshire Eagle.

Four of the charges were attempted business excise tax payments and were found in documents that Krol provided the newspaper in order to "clear his name."

"There are very powerful interests in this city that do not want me to be mayor," he said on his podcast earlier this week, later stating that he is moving on from the situation and will no longer be speaking to The Eagle about it.

On Sept. 20, The Eagle published allegations that Krol used nearly $7,000 from the Animal Dreams cat rescue account to pay off a credit card over several months. Stacey Carver, leader of nonprofit cat rescue Animal Dreams, went to paper with text messages, bank statements, and email exchanges she said showed $6,800 was taken from the nonprofit's account through five separate transfers in 2019.

The mayoral candidate served on the board from 2013 to 2018 and had been an officiary of the account.

Krol took to Facebook Live to rebut the allegations, attributing it to a "banking error" on Greylock Federal Credit Union's part for providing him with the wrong account number and called the story an "absolute unadulterated political hit piece."

He also addressed the allegation of never working off his debt to Carver's ex-husband Allan Harris, owner of Berkshire Money Management, after he cut him a check to cover the monies that were spent out of the Animal Dreams account. Krol said there was no understanding that it had to be paid back.

He provided documents that he said cleared his name and went to The Berkshire Eagle's office for a long meeting last week.  

The materials that Krol shared included a sixth payment to his business account from the nonprofit and, upon further investigation, The Eagle reported it found four additional attempts from the Animal Dreams account to pay a yearly $456 business excise tax to the state Department of Revenue for the 2016, 2017, 2018, and 2019 tax years. The state rejected each payment because it was from the nonprofit's account and not Krol's.


This adds up to 10 transactions from or attempted from the Animal Dreams account.

Some of the documents were provided to iBerkshires last week but were incomplete and no conclusions could be drawn from them regarding any new charges. One document was an image of an email from a Greylock Federal employee responding to Krol's reference to a "business checking account" with the checking account number of the nonprofit. 

Krol told The Eagle that use of the account for his excise taxes was news to him and has maintained that he did no wrongdoing, saying there was no malintent. He could not recall how his business OneEighty Media's excise taxes were paid but insisted that they were.

On his podcast that was posted to Facebook Live, he said he walked into The Eagle with good faith and was hoping to clear the air but instead, he was grilled over new information that he knew nothing about.

"They weren't payments because those payments were actually rejected," he said.

"And they were in the DOR system so year after year, they continue to glitch and that number wasn't used so there was no payment so the idea that it was for more payments is not accurate. There was not a payment made."

He could not answer why that account number was used in scheduling the payment.  

Krol had originally promised documentation from his then accountant Barry Clairmont, husband of Mayor Linda Tyer, during the in-person interview but then denied permission for the paper to speak to Clairmont next day, The Eagle reported.

On his podcast, Krol said he is "moving on," claiming that there were all kinds of other accusations made during this meeting and that it "didn't seem fair at all." He had originally threatened to seek legal action for defamation after the first story was published one day after the preliminary election that secured him a place on the general election ballot.

"We are going to move forward, we are going to run our campaign, and we're moving on from this issue and there's not going to be any more communication on the issue with Berkshire Eagle," he said.

"Because I don't think people want to hear it. They want to hear about the ideas right that we have."

Krol said that under his administration, Pittsfield will be the "most transparent financial city" with a new finance director from outside of the city and an outside auditor.

"We are the campaign that is talking about fiscal transparency and I think that's exactly what people may not like because there are a lot of people who are in positions of power in this community who really like the status quo," he said.

"So when you talk about change, when you talk about real change, there seems to be consequences for that including these hit pieces from The Berkshire Eagle."

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Looks to the Future of Zoning Bylaws

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board is reviewing the town's zoning bylaws with an eye to amending zones to align with planning documents and projects. 

Members started at last week's meeting to at priority zoning projects that align with the Open Space and Recreation Plan and the Master Plan that was adopted last year. Earlier in the meeting, the board accepted the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's draft of the OSRP, which the Select Board accepted late last month.

Town planner Andrew Groff informed the board of upcoming projects that will need to be looked at for zoning purposes to try and stay ahead of the bylaws that aligned in both the OSRP and Master Plan.

"Principally, would be going back and thinking about this idea of a mixed-use zoning district for the northern part of town that's responsive to the growth of outdoor recreation as it is really an industry. So you've got Shaker Ridge, you've got the folks at Donnybrook that proposes a glamping resort, Ramble Wild, and Brodie Mountain just over the town line in New Ashford with some new ownership and expanded interest in some development there, so that's one item that's called for in both."

Groff also explained they need to look into agriculture zones to help local farmers 

"Seeing if we can't do something to better support our farms because we have a couple great little farm clusters in Lanesborough. You know, zoning for agriculture is pretty expansive in Massachusetts. The exemption for agriculture is pretty wise, but we want to take a closer look and talk to some of our farmers and figure out there's some tweaks we can do that would make their lives easier."

He also brought up how they can help fix the zoning bylaws around the lake that are nonconforming and want to look into grant funding to help.

"Work that's going to be done to further protect Pontoosuc Lake, and we have a lot in our master plan regarding the zoning issues on Pontoosuc from the issue that you had mentioned to me, bringing back the citizens who were concerned about building heights down there, but you know, more fundamentally identified in the master plan is the problems with how everything is basically nonconforming. The zoning doesn't conform to what the actual built environment is. That's something we probably want to look into talking with folks in the community planning office," he said.

Groff mentioned there is a ballot question that, if it passes, would mean changing zoning regarding public water and sewer, and affect properties near the lake. 

"There is going to be on the ballot in November a question that will essentially require any community in Massachusetts that has built an environment that's on public water/sewer, you're going to have to reduce your lot sizes to 5,000 square feet. So I feel like if that passes, that has massive implications for that part of town. So, just another one to put out there, but maybe we want to wait to really tackle that with some grant funding once we know what the Legislature's done."

Chair Leanne Yinger said she lives in that area and it already seems very congested, meaning that the passage of the ballot question could have big implications.

She also mentioned another implication for the health of the lake she would like to see happen.

"I would like to see us ban pesticides and people treating their lawns," she said. "Part of the problem of the health of the lake is that when I say that out loud, and I'm saying it out loud to anybody who will listen to me, it is not a popular thing to say. But it is killing the lake."

Yinger said she would like to clarify who governs the sewer system around Pontoosuc Lake, noting the new owner of a friend's house needed to purchase access to the sewer from a private party. Groff said he couldn't remember if it is water district or town, but that there is something "funky" about the governance over there.

"I need to understand what that looks like, because the way it came down was interesting. The line comes in from Pittsfield, but there are people claiming that they have rights to it because they bought into it originally. I just want to understand what that's like and who's saying you're in charge with it, because it seems to me that that's a town-managed situation," Yinger said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories