image description
The structure at 89 Daniels Ave., a four-bedroom and two-bath multifamily, has an absentee owner with multiple potential heirs who have not been responsive.

Pittsfield Health Board Votes Demolition for Multifamily Properties

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Board of Health voted for the demolition of two condemned properties and discussed how to preserve other housing stock from this fate.

"It's so unfortunate that we end up kind of with houses that if we could get in somehow much earlier we wouldn't have to take them down," Chair Roberta Elliott said on Tuesday. "It seems like such a late approach."

A house at 135 Lincoln St., a four-bedroom and two-bath multifamily built more than a century ago, has been condemned for a year with no improvement made to the property.

Code Enforcement Officer Andrew Gagnon said it started with an anonymous complaint about a vacant unsecured building and a few days later, it was condemned after an inspection.  

"The owner did secure the property from unlawful entry," he added. "It's since been a year since that original condemnation. There's been no improvement to the property so we are going to issue a demolition order."

Public Health Director Andy Cambi explained that after a year of non-compliance, and if the department sees a threat to the community because it is unsecure and blighted, the department can move forward with the demolition request.

He reported that the property appears to be structurally sound.

"When the board approves that, we give the owners nine days," he said. "There have been opportunities where owners have gotten their request to demolish and have made some movements whether it was to sell the property or rehab the property."

After 90 days, the city can enforce the request by court order or it can go into the city's demolition list, as two or three are knocked down each fiscal year in conjunction with the Department of Community Development. Because this property has active owners, the court order would be issued after that time period.

The structure at 89 Daniels Ave., a four-bedroom and two-bath multifamily also built more than 100 years ago, has an absentee owner with multiple potential heirs who have not been responsive.

"Back in January of 2022, there was an emergency medical call, Pittsfield Police called us out. The house is deteriorating, structural issues, no running water hoarding, unsanitary conditions, no utilities so it was condemned," Gagnon explained.

"A year later in preparation for the order to demolish, the city solicitor's office was contacted to see if there were any potential additional heirs. Some more were found so the process pretty much restarted and that leads us to just this week or last week when I went out to take the photograph where the property is still vacant, still unsecured, and has further deteriorated."



Cambi added that if the property were to catch on fire, it would not be safe for first responders to enter.

Board members urged health officials to have the building secured as soon as possible since the demolition may take some time. They wondered if there were ways of intervention that could prevent properties from reaching this state, such as offering options alternative to demolition like donating the property to Habitat For Humanity.

Cambi explained that it usually takes a couple of years of vacancy before properties end up with requests to demolish. The city cites the state sanitary code and approaches that will make the unit habitable.

"And that constant enforcement that we do keeps these properties as maintained as possible," he said.

He said the Health Department pushes programs offered by the city as much as possible while keeping the balance of code enforcement and reminding owners that the property will get worse if it regular maintenance needs continue to be neglected.

Elliott asked Cambi to provide the board with the communication sent to owners to see if there is an opportunity to strengthen it, offering to continue the discussion at the next meeting.

"I do like the idea of trying to do something before we get to the point where we're condemning it," she said.

Cambi said there is definitely room for some outreach services, whether it is a flier outlining programs through the Department of Community Development, the bank, or other entities.

In other news, the city received a $5,000 stipend through the state Department of Public Health for a gambling disorder screening day.

This will be used for screenings that will then identify individuals who can be referred to further resources. The Health Department will not be treating the disorders.

"We've seen an increase with the mobile online gambling that is available, with the closeness to the fairly new casino in Springfield," Cambi explained. "So that has an impact on everybody as far as housing insecurity, food insecurity so I think it's a good activity for the social worker to work on."


Tags: blight,   demolition,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield Council Revisiting DEI Office Restructure

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The conversation about the DEI office renaming that was halted by a charter objection will resume on Tuesday. 

The City Council will discuss a request from Mayor Peter Marchetti to restructure the Office of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion.  

It proposes to rename the DEI office to the Office of Equity, Access, and Opportunity and merge the Human Rights Commission and Affirmative Action Committee into an Equity, Access and Opportunity Commission.

The Ordinance and Rules Subcommittee supported the changes in August, and in September, Ward 2 Councilor Cameron Cunningham delayed the vote with a charter objection. 

Pittsfield's City Code prohibits charter states that "if a single member present objects to the taking of the vote, the vote shall be postponed until the next meeting of the city council." It also stipulates that at least four members must object if it is an emergency measure.

Cunningham also submitted a petition, which was referred to O&R under Rule 27, to replace the DEI Office and the Human Rights Commission with an equity, access, and opportunity coordinator in the Department of Community Development, with formal complaints and Equal Employment Opportunity and Affirmative Action functions assigned to Human Resources.

At the last meeting, he spent more than an hour querying the mayor and chief diversity officer about functions and effectiveness of the department, wanting more quantitative data.  Cunningham proposed an ordinance that he says keeps Pittsfield's commitment to equity, access, and opportunity, "refocuses it on measurable results for our residents, and delivers it at a fraction of the current cost." 

Under this petition, the equity, access, and opportunity coordinator would be a $60,000 to $80,000 per year position.

The DEI Office's fiscal year 2027 budget was about $200,000 after cuts during budget season; $106,700 for the chief diversity officer and $58,000 for the administrative assistant. The coordinator would be appointed by the director of community development and the mayor. 

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories