Letter: Time to retire Maryland's third senator

Print Story | Email Story
To the Editor:
 
Time to retire Maryland's third senator
 
Sen. Chuck Grassley visits all 99 Iowa counties every year (not every six years) as does his colleague Sen. Joni Ernst. The media has dubbed this tour "The Full Grassley."
 
Sen. Amy Klobuchar goes to all 87 Minnesota counties annually and Sen. Chuck Schumer shows up in all 62 New York counties each year.
 
Our junior senators from Ed Brooke to Paul Tsongas to John Kerry all made it a point to get to each and every part of the Commonwealth.
 
We have 14 counties (one of which – Nantucket - is a single town) and yet there are dozens of communities from the hilltowns of western Mass to North Quabbin and the Blackstone Valley that Sen. Ed Markey can't be bothered to set foot in. Since joining the US Senate in 2013, he's never visited almost all of the rural towns in the five western counties. This is unacceptable.
 
The fact that he spends more time in his Chevy Chase mansion rather than in Cheshire, Chesterfield and Charlton is why he's earned the disparaging moniker as Maryland's third senator.
 
Markey also doesn't answer his constituent mail. Looking to know where he stands on an issue or if he'll co-sponsor a piece of legislation? Well, good luck waiting for a reply to your query.
 
Markey voted for NAFTA which resulted in the loss of 185,000 good-paying manufacturing jobs (43 percent of this sector's employment) between 1994-2002 in Massachusetts.
 
Markey was the deciding vote in 1998 to repeal the Glass-Steagall Act. This sellout to Wall St. and unwise degregulation helped pave the way for the 2008 financial collapse where approximately 60,000 homes were foreclosed on in Massachusetts between 2007 – 2011. To make things worse, Markey voted in 2008 to throw $700 billion of taxpayer money to bail out these financial firms who gave hefty bonuses to their CEOs and top executives. Markey voted for big bank bailouts and Bay State homeowners and businesses went bankrupt.
 
On Sept. 1, please join me in voting for Rep. Seth Moulton.
 
Matt L. Barron
54 Stage Road, Chesterfield, MA
413-446-5228

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Rutledge Defense Seeks Dismissal of Rape Charges Over Statute of Limitations

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Superior Court courtroom was filled on Thursday as proceedings resumed on the high-profile case against former Miss Hall's School teacher Matthew Rutledge, with the court hearing arguments on his motion to dismiss.
 
 
On Thursday, Rutledge, represented by attorney Ryan Schiff, appeared before Judge Michael Callahan to seek dismissal of all three counts, arguing that prosecutors were attempting to circumvent the statute of limitations and had failed to disclose what Schiff characterized as "highly exculpatory evidence."
 
More than 100 attendees filled the pews, some wearing orange carnations to show solidarity with the accusers, Melissa Fares and Hilary Simon. 
 
As Rutledge attempted to leave the courtroom following Judge Callahan's departure, several attendees voiced their outrage, shouting "Shame," "You can't hide behind the bad law," and "We know what you did."  
 
Judge Callahan re-entered the courtroom to condemn these outbursts and directed court officers to record their names and bar them from attending future proceedings on this case.
 
The nearly hour-long hearing centered on competing interpretations of the language and legislative intent behind Massachusetts' statute of limitations, particularly whether Rutledge's temporary absences from the state could extend the time prosecutors have to bring charges.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories