image description
Roots Rising is giving up on a farm at Springside Park because of arsenic-infected soils and invasive plants that would require years of preparation and maintenance.

Springside Park Not Viable for Roots Rising Farm

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Arsenic-infected soils and invasive plants have led Roots Rising to pull its farm project from Springside Park.

"Over the past several months we have been studying the site at Springside Park. We found levels of arsenic that require further investigation as well as a number of species of invasive plants," Executive Director Jess Vecchia wrote to the Parks Commission.

"One such plant, cypress spurge, is of particular concern because contact with the latex sap can cause serious burns on skin, as well as permanent corneal damage if it comes into contact with the eyes."

Earlier this year, the nonprofit farming organization came to the commission with plans for its Youth Farm that is an intersection of the organization's youth empowerment and food justice work.

Included in the roughly four-acre plans next to the Chestnut Seed Orchard were a tool shed, farm office, curing and drying shed, a wash and pack station, an open-air pavilion, and the build-out of a hoop house and prop house.

Roots Rising hired Regenerative Design Group to help create a report that outlines the methods for cypress spurge suppression, potential methods of cultivation, and future invasive control.


"While farming is certainly possible at Springside Park, we do not believe the park is a viable location for our Youth Farm," Vecchia wrote.

On Tuesday, commissioners said it was "unfortunate" that the site is not fit.  

The organization would need to spend up to three years tiling the soil every three weeks to get it ready for use, which would require special equipment and staff time. Planning could not begin until the fourth year and invasive control would need to be part of the farm management plan in perpetuity.  

There would even still be a high potential for exposure or injury from the cypress spurge to anyone who puts their hands in the soil.

"While this is disappointing news, a diligent land assessment ensures the greatest potential for success of our farm project," Vecchia wrote.

The organization has been looking for a place to call home for a couple of years and will continue conversations with city staff and private landowners to find an alternate site and the commission was thanked for its support.


Tags: agriculture,   Springside Park,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories