Labor Board Rejects Appeal by Northern Berkshire Healthcare

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — Northern Berkshire Healthcare's appeal on criteria for potential union members was summarily rejected last week.

The health system had argued to the National Labor Relation Board's Region 1 that nurses and certain certified nursing assistants at Sweet Brook Care Centers had supervisory duties and thus should not be eligible to vote on a proposed bargaining unit.

In a 19-page decision, the regional board reviewed and rejected Northern Berkshire Healthcare's position. NBH then appealed to the labor board's executive office.

At issue was whether registered and licensed practical nurses at the nursing facility had authority over nursing assistants and other staff. NBH officials said they did, which would prevent them from voting on whether to organize a local bargaining unit of 1199 Service Employees International Union.

But in a one-sentence response last Thursday, Chairwoman Wilma B. Liebman and member Peter C. Schaumber declined to even review the appeal.

"Employer's request for review of the regional director's decision and direction of election is denied as it raises no substantial issues warranting review."

"We are disappointed that the NLRB did not agree with us, because previous court decisions support our position," wrote Dianne Cutillo, vice president of external affairs at Northern Berkshire Healthcare in an e-mail Friday. "In the Health Care & Retirement Corp. and Kentucky River cases, the U.S. Supreme Court established the supervisory status of nurses under whose direction CNAs perform their work."

Officials had cited the court cases in their reasoning before the regional board.


Reached Monday, 1199SEIU spokesman Jeff Hall said the national board had echoed what the regional board had determined.

"From the outset, this attempt by NBH executives to deny indefinitely workers their right to vote has been incredibly misguided and has been an epic waste of patient care funding," he said. 

SEIU and workers at Sweet Brook have complained the health care system is wasting time and money and using intimidation tactics to obstruct a unionizing vote. Health care officials say they are only trying to ensure all workers have a clear understanding of what a vote will mean.

SEIU, which also covers employees including LPNs at North Adams Regional Hospital, filed a number of complaints last month over NBH's actions and requested the postponement of the March 26 union vote. Hall said the election would not move forward until the National Labor Relations Board resolved the complaints.

The National Labor Relations Board would set and oversee the election.
 
Cutillo wrote Friday that Northern Berkshire Healthcare had not yet been contacted about the complaints.

"We continue to support a free, fair, and secret ballot election," she wrote. "We look forward to completing the election process when set by the NLRB."
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Officials Mull ARPA Funds to Address School Race Issue

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Select Board on Monday will consider considered dedicating some of the town's remaining ARPA funds to address an emergency situation in the local public schools.
 
Randal Fippinger brought the idea to the board in response to detailed testimony on racist incidents at Williamstown Elementary School and Mount Greylock Regional School that were raised both to the town's diversity committee and the Mount Greylock Regional School Committee.
 
Last week, the School Committee was asked to form a task force to address the issue and to bring in an outside consultant to advise the district on how to properly train its staff and, going forward, create a more inclusive environment in the preK-12 system.
 
On Monday, Fippinger suggested an amount, $27,000, that the town could spend to help pay for the consultant and a source for that money: the remaining American Rescue Plan Act funds that need to be committed by the end of the calendar year.
 
Fippinger raised the idea during a continuation of a discussion from the board's April 22 meeting about a request from Town Manager Robert Menicocci to allocate nearly $80,000 in ARPA funds for a sewer project.
 
With only three Select Board members present at the April 22 meeting, they decided to take no action on the request. But in the April meeting, Fippinger and Menicocci offered differing recollections of the board's intentions for about $166,000 remaining from the nearly $2 million ARPA allocation.
 
Menicocci said it was his understanding that the board was OK with him counting on the remaining funds for infrastructure needs. Fippinger countered that the board had made no such commitment and was still open to addressing other priorities with the federal aid.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories