Mount Greylock School Committee Approves Cost-Share Agreement

By Patrick RonaniBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
Committee Chairman David Archibald, left, and Superintendent William Travis listen to discussion during Monday night's meeting.
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Mount Greylock Regional School Committee approved an agreement Monday night that would reduce costs by sharing administrative positions between the district and School Union 71.

Six of the seven committee members — David Langston abstained — voted in favor of the agreement, which is now up for approval by the union, which consists of the Williamstown and Lanesborough elementary schools. School Union 71 committee members will meet on Thursday at 7:30 p.m. in the Williamstown Municipal Building to discuss the agreement.

"We may have an agreement by both parties by the end of the week," district committee member Carolyn Greene said.

Monday's vote came after extensive discussion of the plan and last week's postponement.

If the union approves, the next step will call on the administrative review subcommittee — which consists of two members from the district (one each from Williamstown and Lanesborough) and two from the union (one each from Williamstown and Lanesborough) — to make recommendations for the shared administrative positions, including superintendent, business director and special education director.

Once the recommendations are made by the subcommittee, the district and union will vote separately to approve the cost-sharing positions. Because of the pending retirement of Mount Greylock Regional Superintendent William Travis, whose last day is June 30, committee members strongly urged for a special meeting before the next scheduled session, which was slated for Tuesday, June 15.

"I am anxious about postponing this and dragging it out," Langston said. "I think we ought to be prepared, as a committee, to meet sooner [than June 15] in order to get this moving."

Chairman David Archibald said he was "more than 50 percent certain" that the committee will meet in early June to vote on the shared positions.

According to the agreement, the cost sharing will be divided as follows in fiscal year 2011: 46 percent from the district, 33 percent from Williamstown Elementary and 21 percent from Lanesborough Elementary. The percentages are determined by two ratios: the student enrollments and the number of full-time employees in the three schools based on figures from October 1, 2009.

Going forward, the formula, which garnered considerable attention during Monday's hourlong meeting, will be based on the average enrollment and employee figures over a five-year period. For fiscal 2012, the percentages will be based on the averages from Oct. 1 of 2009 and 2010. The 2009 numbers will factor into cost-sharing percentages between the three schools until fiscal 2016, when a new five-year cycle will begin, encompassing averages from Oct. 1 of 2010 through 2014.

"We want to reduce major swings," committee member Ronald Tinkham said. "This accomplishes what we're trying to achieve in having some stability in the numbers."

In other business Monday night, the committee approved the changes made to the regional school district agreement between the towns of Williamstown and Lanesborough, which will be up for a vote tonight at the annual town meeting at Williamstown Elementary School.

At the request of Town Manager Peter Fohlin, the committee will provide a one-page review for voters, highlighting the changes in the agreement. The most notable change is the apportionment of operating costs, which follows the same five-year cycle as written in the proposed cost-share plan between the district and union, except it will factor in just the pupil enrollment figures between the two towns.
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Fitch, Barrett Meet in Debate for State Representative Seat

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The two candidates for the Democratic nomination to represent the First Berkshire District on Beacon Hill found a lot of common ground Thursday on some issues but differed on what is needed to get things done in their only scheduled debate leading up to the Sept. 1 primary election.
 
The incumbent, John Barrett III, and Andrew Fitch, a North Adams city councilor, met in a theater at Williams College's Paresky Center in a forum sponsored by the town's chapter of the League of Women Voters, fielding questions submitted by the public and posed by moderator Jennifer Howlett for just less than an hour.
 
The pair agreed at least in part on issues ranging from same-day voter registration to assisted suicide to the statewide ballot initiative to repeal the legalization of cannabis in the commonwealth.
 
But they parted ways when asked whether they would support efforts to institute a single ballot primary and whether the current Legislature has been responsive enough to respond to a 2024 ballot initiative to have the state auditor audit the House and Senate.
 
Barrett argued that the Legislature already conducts audits and puts the results on the state's website. He further pointed to a lawsuit brought by Auditor Diana DiZoglio over the issue.
 
"She went to court, and the court asked her, are these the four things you wanted [from an audit], and she said yes," Barrett said. "We gave her legislation that gave her the four things she wanted."
 
Calling himself a "big fan of audits," Barrett argued that he participated in them as mayor of North Adams for 26 years. He called efforts to have the state auditor conduct the audit of the Legislature a "Republican thing" and a "sad game."
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories