Ethical Complaints Raised Against Lanesborough Officials

By Andy McKeeveriBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story
The Board of Selectmen did not respond to the complaint.

LANESOROUGH, Mass. — A town resident is alleging that the chairman of the School Committee is using the Board of Selectmen as a "front to serve some other agenda."

Rich Cohen, a former School Committee member, filed a complaint with the town and the Selectmen on Monday accusing the board and the School Committee chairman of unethical behavior.

He cited two instances in which School Committee Chairman Robert Barton has pushed issues pertaining to the Elementary School through the Board of Selectmen without consulting with the rest of the School Committee.

Earlier this year, Barton requested a total of $5,000 for a study and a survey regarding the Superintendency Union 71.

Barton had not talked with his committee first but was granted the money. That request caused consternation with both the School Committee and Superintendency Union 71 because they were unaware of the issue.

The second instance was regarding a meeting on Thursday about the town's position on a feasibility study for a new Mount Greylock Regional School. Barton had requested the meeting and the Board of Selectmen are now hosting it.

"A number of people have complained to me about whether the Board of Selectmen have been giving undue influence to the chairman of the Lanesborough Elementary School Committee," said Cohen on Monday. "He cannot be using the Board of Selectmen to get around his obligation to serve on the Lanesborough Elementary School Committee."

Barton is a former selectman who resigned to run for the School Committee position. While a selectman, he established an array of town committees, including an appointed education committee tasked with finding ways to save money in the long-term for the town.



Barton now sits on both that town committee as well as the elected School Committee, so in requesting those two items from the Selectmen, he positioned himself as speaking for the town committee.

"He can't act as an independent party or of another board," Cohen said. "Elected bodies need to operate independently from each other."

Thursday's meeting, for example, is being held by the Board of Selectmen but came at the request of Barton. The invitations for the meeting were sent out by Barton instead of the Selectmen or town administrator. Town Administrator Paul Sieloff said the emailed invitations were sent out by Barton as "a favor" because he was out of town.

Nonetheless, Cohen alleges that Barton is using the Selectmen to approach topics — such as moving the middle school students to the elementary school — that should be vetted by the School Committee.

"The Board of Selectmen have been used as a front to serve some other agenda," Cohen says.

The Selectmen did not comment on the complaint other than saying they would "take it under advisement."

Earlier this month, Cohen also filed an Open Meeting Law complaint with the attorney general regarding Barton's behavior during a meeting.

Cohen's complaint is available below.

Cohen Letter to the BoS 24March

 


Tags: ethics complaint,   Lanesborough,   open meeting complaint,   school committee,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories