Uncertainty Surrounds Dunkin' Donation of Pittsfield Church

By Joe DurwinPittsfield Correspondent
Print Story | Email Story
Despite the withdrawal of a demolition plan, the fate of St. Mary's Church in Pittsfield remains murky.
PITTSFIELD, Mass. — News of a possible reprieve for the former St. Mary the Morning Star Church caused a stir of reactions on Monday, but details remain opaque about the suggestion that the 72-year-old church building could potentially be donated to the city.
 
According to a press release sent out to local media by a publicist on behalf of Cafua Management Co., the Dunkin' Donuts franchisee is preparing a revised proposal for the Tyler Street property, which would maintain the main church building.
 
In this new proposal, which would presumably still involve the demolition of an adjacent rectory and potentially other structures on the 2.6-acre parcel, Cafua says the iconic former house of worship would be donated "to the City of Pittsfield, for use as the city deems appropriate."
 
"Our next step is to meet with the City Planner, present the plan to the public and pursue city approvals," said Gregory Nolan, chief development officer for Cafua, in Monday's statement. "The process will take time, but our aim is to ultimately do right by the community."
 
In fact, representatives from Cafua had already met with City Planner Cornelius J. Hoss just prior to the media announcement, though no discussion of the possibility of donating the church took place at that time.
 
"We met [Monday] to discuss their options, and after that discussion, they made the decision that it would be best to withdraw their plans for now, until they've had a chance to explore their options for the property," Hoss said.
 
At this time, the only official communication from the developer to city hall has been to withdraw their current site plan application.  
 
"No one has reached out to me at all," said Mayor Daniel Bianchi, of the possibility of donating the church to the city.
 
According to Cafua, though, the topic was already been broached with the city at Monday's meeting.
 
"We discussed donating the church with the city planner and other officials but no further plans have been made," contended Nolan, when reached for comment on Tuesday.  
 
"There will need to be some follow-up meetings before we present the plan to the public then we will work closely with the city for approvals. The process could take months," Nolan told iBerkshires.
 
The concept of Cafua's purchase of, and subsequent donation to the city, is a complicated one.
 
"We don't know the implications," Bianchi told iBerkshires on Tuesday. "We don't know that building that well, or what kind of liabilities might accrue to that property."
 
While Bianchi said the idea of a collaborative effort might be possible, it would be "a very poor move, on the part of the city" to take on the property alone.
 
"That would be an incredible burden on the taxpayers, just to absorb it," said the mayor.
 
"We would have to have a business plan that made sense," he added. "Logically, for the city, we would like to partner with an organization or a developer that wanted to do something. We would have to have a well-thought-out proposal.
 
"Obviously, the church has got a lot of problems. For them to knock it down, and remediate the land, would be a very, very costly thing. ... They're being smart businessmen, by trying to transfer the liability from the church to someone else."
 
Despite concerns, the mayor said he remains open to hearing from the developer on a revised proposal.
 
"I certainly am curious and anxious to hear what they have to say, and how creative and collaborative they're willing to be," Bianchi concluded. "Maybe we will find a developer with a really creative idea on how to reuse that building for a unique purpose."
 
Meanwhile, a planned public hearing before the city's Historical Commission on Oct. 7 has been canceled. In light of the application's withdrawal, and in the absence of any clear proposal at this time, the commission will defer on the issue for now, though it may be taken up again at the next regularly scheduled meeting in November.
 
"At that point, maybe there will be some more information, so that they can have more of a substantive discussion about how they can participate in the process," Hoss said.
 
While the commission would have no binding authority on the church property, which is too young to qualify for its review under the city's demolition delay ordinance, its members expressed keen interest in providing a forum to hear from concerned citizens, who in recent weeks have lobbied hard against the proposal, through petitionboycott efforts and hundreds of phone calls to both Cafua and the Springfield Diocese.
 
"The collective feedback from the residents of Pittsfield lead us to revise our plan," said Nolan. "We have and always will continue to listen to the needs and wants of the community and aim to do what's right."
 
"I'm so proud of the Pittsfield residents who really spoke from the heart," Bianchi said of the level of public action.

Tags: church reuse,   demolition,   Dunkin Donuts,   historical building,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

State Fire Marshal: New Tracking Tool Identifies 50 Lithium-Ion Battery Fires

STOW, Mass. — The Massachusetts Department of Fire Services' new tool for tracking lithium-ion battery fires has helped to identify 50 such incidents in the past six months, more than double the annual average detected by a national fire data reporting system, said State Fire Marshal Jon M. Davine.
 
The Department of Fire Services launched its Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Investigative Checklist on Oct. 13, 2023. It immediately went into use by the State Police Fire & Explosion Investigation Unit assigned to the State Fire Marshal's office, and local fire departments were urged to adopt it as well. 
 
Developed by the DFS Fire Safety Division, the checklist can be used by fire investigators to gather basic information about fires in which lithium-ion batteries played a part. That information is then entered into a database to identify patterns and trends.
 
"We knew anecdotally that lithium-ion batteries were involved in more fires than the existing data suggested," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "In just the past six months, investigators using this simple checklist have revealed many more incidents than we've seen in prior years."
 
Prior to the checklist, the state's fire service relied on battery fire data reported to the Massachusetts Fire Incident Reporting System (MFIRS), a state-level tool that mirrors and feeds into the National Fire Incident Reporting System (NFIRS). NFIRS tracks battery fires but does not specifically gather data on the types of batteries involved. Some fields do not require the detailed information that Massachusetts officials were seeking, and some fires may be coded according to the type of device involved rather than the type of battery. Moreover, MFIRS reports sometimes take weeks or months to be completed and uploaded.
 
"Investigators using the Lithium-Ion Battery Fire Checklist are getting us better data faster," said State Fire Marshal Davine. "The tool is helpful, but the people using it are the key to its success."
 
From 2019 to 2023, an average of 19.4 lithium-ion battery fires per year were reported to MFIRS – less than half the number identified by investigators using the checklist over the past six months. The increase since last fall could be due to the growing number of consumer devices powered by these batteries, increased attention by local fire investigators, or other factors, State Fire Marshal Davine said. For example, fires that started with another item but impinged upon a battery-powered device, causing it to go into thermal runaway, might not be categorized as a battery fire in MFIRS or NFIRS.
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories