Pittsfield's Clairmont Decides Against Re-election Run

Staff ReportsPrint Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — One of the more outspoken of the city councilors has already determined he will not stand for re-election this year.

Councilor at Large Barry Clairmont, first elected in 2011, announced in a statement that the growth of his business is making it difficult to commit to public office:


I will not be seeking re-election for the office of city councilor at large. My accounting practice is experiencing strong and steady growth.  I have assessed the demands on my time and the ability to manage many competing priorities. While I am dedicated to my work as a city councilor, my first commitment must be to my partners and our clients.

My experience as a member of the Pittsfield City Council has been challenging and engaging. It is a privilege to represent the citizens of Pittsfield and I will finish the remainder of my term with the same enthusiasm people have come to expect from me.


Clairmont has clashed frequently with Mayor Daniel Bianchi, including attempts to restrict mayors from taking on outside duties and calling into question Bianchi's bidding process in moving inspection services out of City Hall.

Nomination papers for the Nov. 3 election become available on Thursday, April 2. All 11 council seats, the mayor, city clerk and six School Committee seats are up for election this year.


Tags: city council,   election2015,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Pittsfield School Committee OKs $82M Budget, $1.5M Cuts

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The school budget is less grim than the original proposal but still requires more than $1.5 million in cuts.

On Thursday, the School Committee approved an $82.8 million spending plan for fiscal year 2025, including a city appropriation of $80.4 million and $2.4 million in Chapter 70 funds.

The cuts made to balance the budget include about 50 staff reductions — some due to the sunsetting of federal Elementary and Secondary School Emergency Relief funds.

"The final version does not answer all needs. It will be unacceptable to some or to many but I must say that tonight's final proposal is very different than where we started when we believed we would have a $3,600,000 reduction. I want to assure everyone that every effort has been made to minimize the impact on both students, families, and staff members while also ensuring that our district has the necessary resources to progress forward," Superintendent Joseph Curtis said.

"Nevertheless, there are incredibly passionate, dedicated staff members who will not be with us next year. This pains me as I've been a part of this organization for now 30 years so I want to assure everyone that our team, this has weighed very heavily in our hearts, this entire process. This is not a group of people that is looking at a spreadsheet saying ‘Well that can go and this can go’ and take that lightly."

Assistant Superintendent for Business and Finance Kristen Behnke and other officials worked with the state Department of Secondary and Elementary Education to rectify an error in the Chapter 70 funding formula, recognized 11 more low-income students in the district, and added an additional $2.4 million to the FY25 budget.

Curtis commented that when he first saw the governor’s FY25 budget, he was "rather stunned."

"The extraordinary circumstances we face this budget season by the conclusion of the substantial ESSER federal grant and a significant reduction in Chapter 70 allotment caused challenges for this team and our school principals and our educators and our staff that have been nothing short of all-consuming," he said.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories