Pittsfield Local Receipts Trending High, Cannabis Revenues Dropping

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Halfway through fiscal 2023, the city's collected more than 50 percent of its projected receipts and seems on track to take in more than expected.

"I think we are tracking in a way where local receipts will yet again exceed the actuals, will exceed our estimates," Finance Director Matthew Kerwood reported to the Finance subcommittee on Thursday, adding that this is one of the ways that free cash is generated.

Some $6,604,208 was collected by the end of the second quarter on Dec. 31, 51.4 percent of the estimated total of $12,845,725.  Free cash is now at more than $17 million, up from around $5.3 million in fiscal 2021.

These receipts, which include meals and hotel/motel taxes, plummeted in fiscal 2021 due to the pandemic but have been rebounding since.  

A couple of years ago, cannabis tax dollars surpassed expectations due to a boom in new dispensaries. But market saturation is bringing prices down and revenue numbers are now dropping.

Of the estimated $800,000 in cannabis tax, $332,491 was collected by the end of the second quarter, representing 41.6 percent.  

"When you're the only game in town you can charge $300, I'm just making that up, but when there are four players in town, the price point is going to fluctuate," Kerwood said.

There are about seven dispensaries in the city including Temescal Wellness, Berkshire Roots and Bloom Brothers.

Kerwood said he may have to make adjustments downward in that local receipt if the trend continues to happen.

Twenty-five percent of cannabis revenue goes into the public works stabilization account that was created in 2019, 25 percent goes to the stabilization fund, and 50 percent goes to the general fund.


The stabilization fund currently totals $5,148,695, the public works stabilization fund $255,670, and there is $17,130,565 in free cash certification as of Dec. 15.

During the meeting, the subcommittee voted against transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the general stabilization account and transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the Other Post-Employment Benefits trust account.

They did vote in favor of transferring $2 million in free cash to the public works stabilization account.

Council President Peter Marchetti suggested putting the additional $2 million into public works over the general stabilization account because it will still make more money in investment and can be used to purchase new equipment or do additional road work.

Kerwood also pointed out expenses to watch, which included a 123.2 percent spending of the $800,000 budget for winter maintenance and overtime. 

"This is as of Dec. 31, so anything associated with the Christmas storm would not be part of this expense," he explained.

"But between the two accounts, it's $800,000, there [was a] $3,150 budget adjustment. As of Dec. 31, what had been spent was $486,687. There was another $503,204 encumbered as of Dec. 31, which if you take what has been actually been spent in the encumbrance, it is at 123 percent."

Under state law, this is the only account that can be deficit spent.


Tags: fiscal 2023,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories