Pittsfield Local Receipts Trending High, Cannabis Revenues Dropping

By Brittany PolitoiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — Halfway through fiscal 2023, the city's collected more than 50 percent of its projected receipts and seems on track to take in more than expected.

"I think we are tracking in a way where local receipts will yet again exceed the actuals, will exceed our estimates," Finance Director Matthew Kerwood reported to the Finance subcommittee on Thursday, adding that this is one of the ways that free cash is generated.

Some $6,604,208 was collected by the end of the second quarter on Dec. 31, 51.4 percent of the estimated total of $12,845,725.  Free cash is now at more than $17 million, up from around $5.3 million in fiscal 2021.

These receipts, which include meals and hotel/motel taxes, plummeted in fiscal 2021 due to the pandemic but have been rebounding since.  

A couple of years ago, cannabis tax dollars surpassed expectations due to a boom in new dispensaries. But market saturation is bringing prices down and revenue numbers are now dropping.

Of the estimated $800,000 in cannabis tax, $332,491 was collected by the end of the second quarter, representing 41.6 percent.  

"When you're the only game in town you can charge $300, I'm just making that up, but when there are four players in town, the price point is going to fluctuate," Kerwood said.

There are about seven dispensaries in the city including Temescal Wellness, Berkshire Roots and Bloom Brothers.

Kerwood said he may have to make adjustments downward in that local receipt if the trend continues to happen.

Twenty-five percent of cannabis revenue goes into the public works stabilization account that was created in 2019, 25 percent goes to the stabilization fund, and 50 percent goes to the general fund.


The stabilization fund currently totals $5,148,695, the public works stabilization fund $255,670, and there is $17,130,565 in free cash certification as of Dec. 15.

During the meeting, the subcommittee voted against transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the general stabilization account and transferring and appropriating $2 million from certified free cash to the Other Post-Employment Benefits trust account.

They did vote in favor of transferring $2 million in free cash to the public works stabilization account.

Council President Peter Marchetti suggested putting the additional $2 million into public works over the general stabilization account because it will still make more money in investment and can be used to purchase new equipment or do additional road work.

Kerwood also pointed out expenses to watch, which included a 123.2 percent spending of the $800,000 budget for winter maintenance and overtime. 

"This is as of Dec. 31, so anything associated with the Christmas storm would not be part of this expense," he explained.

"But between the two accounts, it's $800,000, there [was a] $3,150 budget adjustment. As of Dec. 31, what had been spent was $486,687. There was another $503,204 encumbered as of Dec. 31, which if you take what has been actually been spent in the encumbrance, it is at 123 percent."

Under state law, this is the only account that can be deficit spent.


Tags: fiscal 2023,   pittsfield_budget,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Select Board Tables JMJ Negotiations

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — Tensions swirled at Monday's Select Board meeting in light of conversations to dissolve the Baker Hill Road District.

The meeting started with public comment, including from Tim Grogan, development consultant for JMJ RE Holdings, who emphasized that without a dissolution of the road district, the potential sale and redevelopment with the mall would fall through. 

He said the town expects about $760,000 in fiscal 2027 from the road district plus normal taxation. With redevelopment and no district, total income is projected to be around $1.1 million by 2029, he said, implying about a $300,000 annual surplus versus the status quo. He said he provided those calculations to the board.

Keeping the road district alive is not a compromise, Grogan said, referring to a proposal floated by the board last week to facilitate the mall's sale and work with the road district to reduce its tax assessment.

"This mentality by previous select boards and the Baker Hill Road District is what led the property to its current condition," he said. "Further, the Baker Hill Road District has every motive to make this compromise work, as their alternative is dissolution and non-existence. This practice is inherently in bad shape, and JMJ will not entertain any circumstance where the Baker Hill Road District continues to exist. 

"JMJ is inclined and trying to be treated like any other business in the town, and taxes such just like every other major shopping center in the state, keeping the Baker Hill Road District in place will continue to discourage redevelopment, and in this moment will break the delicate balance that has been negotiated between JMJ, Lanesborough, and [buyer Cypress Equities] to the point where the project is no longer feasible, and the only choice is litigation." 

Lyndon Moors, chair of the Finance Committee and recent appointee to the district's Prudential Committee, spoke personally in favor of keeping the district. He said it currently provides more than $500,000 per year to the town, which helps fund two police officers, fire and police vehicles, and over $100,000 per year for the Department of Public Works. He said losing that revenue could significantly impact town services and future budgets, especially as free cash may be lower going into FY28. 

He suggests downsizing the district's budget to reduce the tax burden on the mall and Target, which owns its building separately, while still maintaining revenue for the town. The board should let the litigation play out and not be too hasty in making decisions, he said.

"I think it is unlikely that we will see $1.1 million from the mall property without Baker Hill Road District in FY29. That's what I just heard. We are in FY27 right now. I think that's very unlikely two fiscal years from now, that we are enjoying the tax benefits to the tune of $1.1 million. So I would encourage the Select Board to put on the brakes a little bit, continue to be thoughtful, responsive, deliberative, and let's continue to do what's best for the town," Moors said.

Moors mentioned a Facebook post posted by Blake Mensing, one of the owners of JMJ, on the town group with documents that could be relevant to the meeting, saying it looked as though he was trying to negotiate in public. Mensing said it was an exercise of his First Amendment rights and an attempt to provide transparency to residents, especially since JMJ's opportunity to speak is limited to public comment.

Vice Chair Julie Baker suggested the compromise, said she and board member Michael Murphy have had "very robust and constructive discussions with the district."

"The purpose of it was to see if we could work with them to lessen the special tax burden that the district imposes on the owners, all owners of the mall properties, and while keeping the special tax district in place to preserve the police, fire, police car, and road maintenance services that we received from that special taxation," she said. 

Baker said the district is also interested in giving the road to the state, if the state allows. They also reviewed the district's $800,000 budget and discussed reductions but have not made concrete decisions.

"We find a great deal of interest in helping cut the budget there so that it would reduce the tax burden as well," she said. "So we're not ready with specific numbers yet on that, but there's certainly the willingness to make some major cuts into that budget."

Chair Deborah Maynard said she wants to dissolve the BHRD and that she would not want them to go ahead with the discussions.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories