For those of us in the business world, the myriad economic policy initiatives spewing from the White House are both confusing and at times difficult to understand. 

 

Certain policies seem to cancel each other out. Full employment while reducing immigration, drill-baby-drill to force oil prices lower while raising tariffs to increase prices? 

 

The point is that if even the professionals are having difficulty, how can those with little financial background hope to understand where the economy is going and why?

 

It appears, for example, that economic growth may be moderating as consumer spending weakens, while inflation remains stubborn. Some are calling for a recession. Others stagflation, while the president sees a golden age ahead of us.

 

After sorting through all the above and reading the statements of the president and his cabinet while ignoring the partisan rhetoric, some objectives of the Trump approach to economics have become clear to me.

 

Few would argue that over the last eight years, fiscal spending, deficit, inflation, and the size of government have exploded. As a result, the share of the economy represented by the government versus the private sector has grown lopsided. From an economic viewpoint, the present situation is unsustainable.

 

The Trump administration wants a larger private sector and a smaller share of the economy by the public sector. However, all that government spending did have some beneficial consequences. The growing gap in income and wealth between the haves and have-nots, which we call income inequality, slowed somewhat from historical levels. But it also increased inflation. Over those years, most consumers neither invested nor saved their government-fueled additional income. Instead, they spent their enlarged paychecks on another TV, a bigger car, a family excursion to Disney World, or a front-row seat to the latest rock concert.

 

Turning the direction of the world's largest economy, however, is no easy feat. It will take time and, according to the president and Scot Bessent, his Treasury secretary, will involve a period of pain and discomfort for most Americans.

 

Their first objective, in my opinion, is to slow demand in the real economy. Keynesian demand-side economics says the best way to do that is to reduce spending. Doing so, they believe, will also slow inflation. How do they do that? By distributing less money to the greatest number of people possible. That means slowing wage growth and providing fewer social services to Americans in the median income level and below.

 

Here is where Elon Musk and his DOGE efforts come in. His job, while ostensibly to reduce waste in the government, is also about cutting government employment. All department heads now have that as their No. 1 priority. That is how you generate real cost savings.

 

In addition, Congress has its marching orders. Given the ongoing budget discussions, it is certain that the Republican majorities in both houses intend to cut social services drastically. Medicaid, SNAP food assistance, school lunches, low-income housing assistance, and dozens of other programs are on the chopping block. Those cuts will impact those who are making $80,000 a year or less, which is roughly 81 percent of the population.

 

That will mean no more rock concerts, and in many cases no more jobs unless you want to replace immigrants picking tomatoes or peanuts. Once these bills are passed, it will likely take three to six months for all these spending cuts and lost jobs to work through the economy. 

 

Our income inequality problem will reverse. How will that impact a generation of populists counting on a better life in the months and years ahead? Next week, we will examine the next step in Trump's economic plan, which will center on his program to jump-start a faltering economy through a return to supply-side economics.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

This week, the Federal Reserve Bank hiked its inflation forecast and reduced the growth target for the economy this year. Despite this news, traders termed the March FOMC meeting a "dovish pause," although it did not help the stock market.

 

The upshot of Chairman Jerome Powell's Q&A session on Wednesday afternoon after the FOMC meeting was that as far as the future is concerned, the Fed would need to wait and see just like the rest of us. In the meantime, the bank decided to slow its quantitative tightening program. That was interpreted as dovish by most Fed watchers since it does add liquidity to the credit markets.

 

Powell did say tariffs would probably add to the inflation rate (from 2.5 percent now to 2.8 percent). Although for the most part, he believed these measures would be "transitory." The rate of economic growth would also fall from 2.8 percent in 2024 to 1.7 percent this year.

 

Those forecasts, while not what I would call a full-fledged period of stagflation like we experienced in the 1970s, are akin to my own expectations. I would call it a brief bout of stagflation but with a small "s." I see a quarter or two of slower growth and a smidge higher inflation rate, but I do not see these trends remaining in place for the full year.

 

"I don't know anyone who has a lot of confidence in their forecast," admitted Powell, but the median of Fed officials still expect two rate cuts this year. However, their conviction on where things are heading is weak, and understandably so. After many years in the driver's seat, the Fed is now in the back seat as far as the economy is concerned.

 

Fiscal policy as interpreted by Donald Trump is now calling the shots. Depending on how badly the coming tariff war develops, the administration's overall trade policy, spending cutbacks, immigration restrictions, and deregulation, we could see a recession.

 

However, if tariffs turn out to be simply a negotiating tactic, as many expect, tax cuts do get passed, and somehow the deficit falls then growth could resume, inflation remains in check, and the markets could live happily ever after. I give 50/50 odds on these economic outcomes.

 

I hate "on the other hand" statements, but sometimes, they are what they are. Whether your cup is half full or half empty, I suspect, depends on your political persuasion. As Powell said, "I mean, it's really hard to know how this is going to work out." My sentiments exactly.

 

Unfortunately, the financial markets do not do well when faced with the unknown. As such, the present turmoil in the markets should continue. About the best I can say is that we should expect the daily 1-2 percent swings in the equity market to slow down a bit after this week after Friday's multitrillion-dollar options expirations. That does not mean the downside is over. The fate of the markets remains dependent on the news coming out of the White House.

 

Behind the scenes, the top men at Treasury and  Commerce and Trump's economic adviser, Kevin Hassett, are working hard to reduce the impact of the coming tariffs before the deadline. Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury secretary, appears optimistic they can work a deal between the U.S. and our largest trading partners to roll back tariffs before the April 2 deadline. If so, that would go a long way to alleviate the downside pressure on the markets.

 

At its low, the S&P 500 Index has been off by a little more than 10 percent. Since then, we have bounced, as I expected, but we could still retest those lows or even break them. Sentiment among market participants couldn't be worse. That makes me suspect there might be some light at the end of the tunnel. Of course, I could be wrong and that light at the end of the tunnel could be a freight train. Let's see what happens.

 

The Trump administration's economic policies have placed a target on the back of most foreign nations. As for the economy, a slowdown, if not a recession, seems to be around the corner. As such, overseas investors have little reason to remain in America's financial markets.

 

Foreign investors represent about 17 percent of the overall holdings in the U.S. equity market and about the same in the bond market. Over the last 15 years, as I wrote in my previous column, American markets were the only game in town. While our share of the world's economy was only 27 percent, our share of the world's total investments was 70 percent.

 

America was perceived as being the safest place on Earth to put your money. Our currency, Treasury bonds, and stock markets are the strongest and most lucrative around the globe. In the last 80 days, however, thanks to American policy shifts and a growing realization that our debt and deficit are coming unstrung, foreign investors have been having second thoughts. 

 

At the same time, the administration's about-face in geopolitical terms has not only caught the rest of the world by surprise but has also called into question the future security of many of our allies including Mexico, Canada, Japan, Korea, and the European Community.

 

For the first time in years, there have been compelling arguments for shifting focus from the American financial markets to elsewhere. Is that a good or bad thing? It is always nice to be number one but too much of a good thing can be a negative. One must credit the president for this global shift in thinking.

 

As Scott Bessent, the U.S. Treasury secretary said last weekend about U.S. markets in an NBC interview, "I can tell you that corrections are healthy. They're normal. What's not healthy is straight up." Neither he nor the president has ruled out a recession this year.

 

Trump's tariff plans have caused a wave of self-examination. He has forced countries to re-think who besides the U.S. could offer better and more stable terms of trade in the future. His reciprocal tariffs that are going into effect in April have spurred other countries to stop talking and start planning a defense. Without his sudden about-face in U.S. support for Ukraine and rapprochement with Russia, I suspect Europe would have carried on taking our support for their economies and security for granted for another 50 years.

 

These nations now realize that there has been a generational change sweeping America. It is not only Donald Trump who demands a different approach to trade, politics, and security. In this new era of populism, more than half of all U.S. voters not only applaud his policies but want even more change. It has finally hit home to the rest of the world that MAGA was always about "Making America First" by beggaring everyone else.

 

Trump has provided a wake-up call for the EU and others. Last week, Germany's plan to massively increase spending, just announce has triggered a sea change in European policy making. Canada, who in some respects has acted like a back-water subsidiary of the U.S. for decades, has suddenly found its voice, as has Mexico.

 

China, after several years of declining growth, has used the U.S. trade and security initiatives as a reason to not only stimulate their economy and reach out to other countries to form trade and military alliances but also galvanize the government and private sector. Many in China believe Donald Trump's governance style has much in common with their leader, Xi Jinping. They applaud his efforts to steer the American government closer to their own authoritarian central model.

 

In the last month, money is fleeing U.S. markets and going home. Trump's policies have increased the total value of all businesses in China and Hong Kong by 20 percent and decreased business values in the U.S. by 10 percent. Money is fleeing US markets and going home. Chinese equities are up double digits this year, while the German stock market gained 17 percent, Italy up 15 percent, Spain 14 percent, and emerging markets are up 8 percent.

 

Extreme valuations may also be a factor in the recent move by foreigners to "take their money home." Based on price-to-book value and enterprise value, the U.S. premium to non-U.S. markets is above the 95th percentile and has continued to climb until now. The growth premium for U.S. stocks is what helped to justify those valuations.

 

If growth were to slow, as both the government and investors believe is happening now, U.S. valuations become a headwind. Investors everywhere may no longer be willing to pay lofty prices for less growth.

 

In addition, for America to maintain or increase its share of the world's private-equity market capitalization, which is growing every year, more and more of the world's capital would need to be allocated to the U.S. Given the policies of deliberately slowing economic growth, increasing unemployment, a falling dollar, and an expanding debt problem, why would any foreign investor want to increase their capital allocation to the U.S.? This point was driven home by this month's Bank of America Global Fund Manager Survey. It revealed the second-largest decline in U.S. growth expectations by professional investors ever as well as the largest drop in U.S. equity allocation in the history of the survey.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

The market's decline has been one of the fastest in history. The fall has been fueled by the Trump administration's economic policies. The question most investors are wrestling with is what to do about it.

 

Looking back on this period in a year or two, I guarantee that most investors will have trouble remembering exactly what happened. There is nothing abnormal in this decline thus far except its speed. It is a simple garden variety pullback, which occurs at least once a year if not more. It is the price of doing business for equity investors and savers with tax-deferred retirement accounts.

 

Given that, the decline is probably a good thing for an over-extended market on the upside. Stocks normally take the escalator up and the elevator down. In the pain game, I believe fast is better than slow when dealing with the emotional side of investing. Hopefully, the markets will bounce before too many more negative emotions surface.

 

I say that because emotions are your greatest enemy when investing. It would be a rare reader indeed who isn't feeling worried and stressed right now when dealing with the market. The S&P 500 Index is down more than 10 percent, NASDAQ minus-17 percent and the Russell 2000 minus-18 percent.  Is it time to bail?

 

No. The time for that decision is past. A month ago, taking some off the table may have made sense. Today it doesn't.  "But what if it goes down even more?" Let it, at worst you are halfway through a 20 percent correction but more likely on the eve of a turnaround.

 

Tom Lee, the founder of FSInsight, and a frequent guest on CNBC, reminds us that since 1928 going to cash and missing the 10 best days in a year reduces returns from 8 percent annually to minus-13 percent.

 

September 2022 was the last time investors were this pessimistic, according to the American Association of Individual Investors (AAII).

 

At the end of February, the proportion of investors identifying as bearish reached 60.6 percent.  Historically, when this has occurred, the average subsequent 12-month return has been 24 percent.

 

How can you resist that desire to sell? Stop looking at your accounts. Watching your portfolio daily in a down market is behavioral suicide. Don't do that.

 

So enough with the pep talk. Instead, the market had some good news this week for a change. The Consumer Price Index (CPI)  and the Producer Price Index (PPI) came in cooler than most expected. I say "most" because my forecast of weaker inflation numbers proved accurate. Next month's data will show a 2.4 percent CPI, which will be weaker again. The following month should show a decrease as well. However, given the markets' focus on tariffs and Trump's economic policies, the inflation news did not matter to investors.

 

I expect the unemployment rate will rise as the administration reduces the number of the 3 million federal government workers. If you combine that trend with a slowing economy that is also being engineered by President Trump and his motley crew, we will have developed a perfect storm. That will provide a gateway for the Federal Reserve Bank to begin cutting interest rates once again.

 

Remember the Fed has two areas of responsibility: fighting inflation and maintaining employment. Chair Jerome Powell has already stated several times that the Fed now considers employment the focus of monetary policies. The bond market is already betting on a rate cut as early as May or June, with more to follow. That should be good for the stock market, which usually begins to discount events six months out.

 

Over the last few weeks, I have warned investors to expect as much as a 10-12 percent decline in the S&P 500 depending on the president's actions. He has delivered on that assessment and thus the markets decline. He continues to rile markets and therefore the potential for additional downside remains.

 

The latest University of Michigan consumer sentiment numbers dropped another 10 percent in March. Trump has now admitted his policies will cause at least a slowdown in the economy, higher unemployment, and as for inflation, who knows?

 

The president promises this will all be worth it for those who have faith. Depending on your political bent, you either believe him or not. The stock markets, however, do not deal in faith. The data says stagflation, which has been my prediction for several months. What does well in that environment is foreign markets that do not suffer from the same malady, bonds, and precious metals. This week, gold hit record highs, China and Europe climbed higher, and bonds did much better than stocks. 

 

As for the overall market, it is Trump-dependent, and the president has shown that he is no friend of the stock markets. Wall Street strategists and technicians are looking for at least a dead cat bounce. That is certainly possible given that we still have three weeks until the April 2 reciprocal tariffs are implemented. Who knows, the president might lose his voice in the meantime, change his mind on the tariffs or something may occur out of left field that we aren't expecting.  

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.

It has been a great run. For 15 years, the U.S. stock market has been the envy of the world. Led by the FANG stocks, global investors could not get enough of American stocks — until now.

 

By the end of 2024, global investors had committed more capital to America than ever before. At the same time, the dollar traded at a higher value than ever since the world abandoned fixed exchange rates 50 years ago.

 

While America's share of the global economy was 27 percent, its stock market represented 70 percent of the worldwide stock market. Since 1992, every year China has grown closer to the U.S. as the world's biggest economy. China's GDP has grown 6.5 times as fast as America's, but U.S. stock returns have been 3.5 times as high. China, which makes up 17 percent of the global Gross Domestic Product, has captured less than 3 percent of worldwide market investments.

 

This has not always been the case. At the beginning of the 20th century, for example, the U.S. accounted for less than 15 percent of global equity markets. Since then, we have improved with gains throughout the 1950s and 1960s. Japan at one point in 1989-1990, caught up with our gains but quickly reversed while we continued to gain. 

 

U.S. markets have outperformed all other markets in eight of the past 10 years. And the global market for private-sector investments, which includes equity and credit, is huge. Some companies estimate it is more than $100 trillion. 

 

In the first decade of this century, our ranking fell during the financial crisis but shot up as productivity growth boomed. Productivity is creating more output with the same amount of labor. Over the last five years, American economic output per hour worked rose almost 9 percent despite the COVID-19 setback.

 

The dominance of U.S. returns was also helped by a variety of other factors such as accelerating earnings by U.S. corporations improving profit margins, and cleaner balance sheets. In addition, U.S. firms have had greater success expanding overseas. Prior to 2010, 30 percent of U.S. corporate profits were generated overseas. That number has since expanded to 40 percent.

 

Another reason for U.S. outperformance is our ability to take risks. America has been a fertile ground for business formation and risk-taking is part and parcel of starting a new business. 

 

But regardless of how efficient Corporate America and the private sector overall are, it has had enormous support from the government. While America went on a debt spree, Europe, for example, practiced austerity. All that government spending boosted corporate profits considerably.

 

In 2025, however, the mood toward American dominance has soured. Just weeks ago, U.S. investors were hailing Donald Trump's second term as the beginning of America's golden age. His blend of tax cuts and tariffs would accelerate economic growth and boost American dominance once again. Next week, we will focus on the risks that could reverse our No. 1 position in capital markets.

 

Bill Schmick is the founding partner of Onota Partners, Inc., in the Berkshires. His forecasts and opinions are purely his own and do not necessarily represent the views of Onota Partners Inc. (OPI). None of his commentary is or should be considered investment advice. Direct your inquiries to Bill at 1-413-347-2401 or email him at bill@schmicksretiredinvestor.com.