Clarksburg Could Vote on Dam Removal

By Tammy DanielsiBerkshires Staff
Print Story | Email Story

Funds are running out for the removal of the deteriorating Briggsville Dam.
CLARKSBURG, Mass. — The Briggsville Dam's running out of time and cash. The obselete concrete barrier was scheduled to be removed this summer but the privately and grant-funded project has come up $128,000 short.

The town and entities involved in the removal are looking at other funding options but it may come down to the taxpayers deciding if they're willing to foot part of the bill.

The Selectmen last Wednesday were in consensus to move forward to a town meeting once solid figures on the dam's removal were obtained within the next two months and, more importantly, if no further funding could be found. The matter had been raised at a June meeting but delayed until all three Selectmen were in attendance.

Selectman Carl McKinney, who had been adamant on not spending town funds, said it may be the only option.

"My concern, clearly, is there's 136 part-time jobs, 28 to 30 full-time jobs at risk and the real concern, in addition to this, is we'll have these two huge vacant mill buildings in the center of our town deteriorating, unused, with a $700,000 liability attached because of the condition of the dam," he said. "I readily admit I was against funding the dam ... [but] it could potentially become our liability if we end up with the buildings and have to take them down."

The dam had once powered the Strong-Hewat Mill, a complex now occupied by Cascade School Supplies, which can't afford to shoulder the full cost. Town officials fear the company could walk away, saddling it with the buildings and the nonfunctioning dam. The building is owned by Clarksburg Realty, which leased the property to the school supply company about six years ago.

Conservation group American Rivers has been representing Cascade in spearheading the removal project; along with the town, other participating agencies include the state's Division of Ecological Restoration, Hoosuck Chapter of Trout Unlimited, the Hoosic River Watershed Associaton and U.S. Fish and Wildlife. The goal has been to remove the dam, deemed a hazard by the state, and restore the North Branch of the Hoosic River to its natural flow for fish and wildlife.

Breaching the dam would also remove the potential for flooding along the stretch of the river. That possibility could open the way to more federal funding for flood prevention, although Town Administrator Michael Canales said that funding may not be possible until 2012 as part of the Berkshire Regional Planning Commission's hazard plan.

Right now, the project could lose $86,000 in matching grants set to expire this fall. The total cost for the project is estimated at $700,000 but all the engineering work as been done, leaving between $400,000 and $500,000 necessary for the actual removal.

"Everything we have right now is projected costs so they're trying to go out and get a solid cost for the dam removal," said Canales. American Riverways is expected to publish a request for proposals within the next month with a 60-day waiver on obtaining the funds. "At that point, then they'd come back to us, Cascade and other interested parties to see what other money is available."

The cost could come in higher, or could be lower. If other funding doesn't come through, town officials will schedule a special town meeting likely sometime in September to ask taxpayers if they're willing to dip into the $315,000 stabilization to pay whatever the balance is. It would require a two-thirds vote use funds from that account.

"It's either going to have a lot of support and pass or it's going to go down in flames but it won't be for lack of effort," said McKinney. 
If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Planners Bring STR, ADU, Signage Bylaws for Town Vote

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Planning Board held a public hearing on the much anticipated bylaws for short-term rentals, accessory dwelling units, and signage to be presented at the annual town meeting.

For the past few months, planners have diligently been working on wordage of the new bylaws after Second Drop Farm's short-term rental was given a cease and desist because the building inspector said town bylaws don't support them.

The draft bylaw can be found on the website.

The board voted on each of the four articles and heard public comment before moving to entertain any amendments brought forward.

A lot of discussion in the STR section was around parking. Currently the drafted bylaw for parking states short-term rentals require two parking spaces, and with three or more bedrooms, require three spaces but never more than five.

There were questions about the reasons for limiting parking and how they will regulate parking renters choose to park on the lawn or the street. Planners said it is not their call, that is up to the property owner and if it is a public street that would be up to the authorities.

Some attendees called for tighter regulation to make sure neighborhoods are protected from overflow.

Lynn Terry said she lives next to one of the rented houses on Narragansett Avenue and does not feel safe with all of the cars that are parked there. She said there can be up to 10 at a time on the narrow road, and that some people have asked to use her driveway to park. She thinks limiting to five cars based on the house, is very important.

The wordage was amended to say a parking space for each bedroom of the house.

Rich Cohen brought up how his own STR at the Old Stone School helps bring in money and helps to preserve the historic landmark. He told the board he liked what they did and wants to see it pass at town meeting, knowing it might be revised later on.

He said the bylaws now should not be a "one size fits all" but may need to be adjusted to help protect neighborhoods and also preserve places like his.

After asking the audience of fewer than 20 people, the board decided to amend the amount of time an short-term rental can be reserved to 180 days total a year in a residential zone, and 365 days a year in every other zone. This was in the hopes the bylaw will be passed and help to deter companies from buying up properties to run STRs as well as protecting the neighborhood character and stability.

They also capped the stay limit of a guest to 31 days.

Cohen also asked them to add "if applicable" to the Certificate of Inspection rule as the state's rules might change and it can help stop confusion if they have incorrect requirement that the state doesn't need.

The ADU portion did not have much public comment but there were some minor amendments because of notes from KP Law, the town counsel.

View Full Story

More Clarksburg Stories