Pittsfield Board Approves Dollar General With Conditions

By Joe DurwinPrint Story | Email Story
The Community Development Board endorsed permitting for a new Dollar General on West Housatonic Street.

PITTSFIELD, Mass. — The Community Development Board unanimously approved variances to pave the way for a new Dollar General store to be constructed on Route 20, provided it make some aesthetic concessions.

Developers handling the project for the national retailer agreed on Tuesday to a revised site plan that will include an enhanced facade and significantly increased landscaping for the board to endorse a permit for a parking waiver and corner lot variance at the intersection of West Housatonic Street and Callahan Drive.  
 
"We've heard what you said, and we've made efforts to increase our landscaping and soften this project up to make it more presentable for the gateway to your town," said Bob Gage of GBT Realty.
 
The new 9,100-square-foot store will be constructed on a 1.2 acre piece of property owned by Callahan Sign Co.  Dollar General, said its representatives, is not a "dollar store" in the traditional sense, but a discount retailer and variety store of brand merchandise, ranging up to $50 or $60. The store, which will be open 8 a.m. to 10 p.m., also offers basic convenience food offerings accounting for about 12 percent of its floor space.
 
In addition to aesthetic issues, the board expressed strong concerns about the waiver sought to develop a lot consisting of only 30 parking spaces, half as many as that generally stipulated by the city for a store this size.  
 
Developers insisted that this parking lot size is a standard model used throughout the company's rapidly growing chain of nearly 11,000 stores, and has proved ideal in all its locations.
 
"This is a national retail chain. These guys will not build a store and underpark themselves, it just defeats the purpose of having the store in operation," said Gage. "Thirty is the max that they've ever put in one of these stores, and they've never exceeeded it."
 

General Proposal
Exterior Elevations
General Blueprint

"I think that because this is located where it is, it could be a destination for people that don't want to go much farther," said Chairwoman Sheila Irvin. "I think there's something to be said for increasing the parking."  
 
"They're in towns that are much larger than Pittsfield, with the same configuration and the same parking, and the stores are not overparked," said Gage, who said these stores handle a firm average of 10 customers at a time, with the average visit lasting 10 minutes.
 
Having satisfied the board with regards to the parking requirements, Gage and colleague Will Goebel of Bohler Engineering presented a backup plan including much more extensive landscaping to "soften" the appearance of the new box store near the city's western border. 
 
"We had about 66 plantings in the original plan, and we're at about 203 plantings now," said Goebel. "So we're at almost three times what the original proposal was as far as landscaping."
 
The project managers also agreed to work with staff of the Community Development Department to alter building materials used in the exterior to move toward what board member Alfred E. Barbalunga termed a more "New England" style and appearance.  
 
The board voted 5-0, with Louis Costi abstaining, to allow the permits, contingent on the department's sign off.
 

Tags: community development,   dollar store,   parking,   permitting,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Lanesborough Officials Take Road District Dissolution Off Warrant

By Breanna SteeleiBerkshires Staff

LANESBOROUGH, Mass. — The Select Board has removed a town meeting warrant article regarding the dissolution of the Baker Hill Road District.

JMJ Holdings development consultant Tim Grogan spoke in public comment saying the Berkshire Mall owner is currently has purchase-and-sale agreement for the mall. 

Back in February, the Select Board settled a tax dispute with JMJ Holdings by agreeing to move forward in dissolving the district if the company paid $1.1 million to the town. JMJ Holdings had to provide a signed development-and-purchase agreement 30 days before the town meeting. 

JMJ holdings did not submit a payment to be made by May 9. Because of that, the Select Board voted to take the article of the warrant to be voted at the annual town meeting.

Meanwhile, the Baker Hill Road District presented a slideshow defending the district and explaining what it does.

The district currently provides a non-resident-funded revenue stream of around $500,000 per year. These funds help pay for police cars and officer salaries, dump trucks, fire trucks, and more for the town.

"Dissolution would mean the district's three commercial property owners would no longer have to pay for upkeep of the Route Seven/Eight connector road. As a result, the BHRD annual contribution of more than $500,000 to Lanesborough would disappear permanently, since the services and maintenance costs associated with the Route Seven and Eight connector road would still remain," said Tom Caraccioli, PR consultant with AH&M Inc. "Lanesborough would have to absorb these costs and continue to provide emergency services to the mall and Target. The financial burden for these remaining expenses would then fall on Lanesborough taxpayers through higher taxes or the reduction of other important town services."

The proposal with JMJ would affect the town in a negative way Caraccioli claimed. 

"JMJ is proposing a one-time payment of $1.1 million to Lanesborough in exchange, JMJ would never pay BHRD taxes again. The decision to dissolve the BHRD by accepting this proposed $1.1 million would be a permanent choice that would have irreversible consequences," he said. "There will be no official system in place to cover recurring costs once the money from this single payment is spent. Therefore, the proposed one-time payment is not a long-term solution for the town of Lanesborough."

JMJ's dispute was that the Berkshire Mall no longer exists as a functioning entity and it should not be on the hook for protection and maintenance that had been based on the mall's operation in its heyday. The company is seeking to redevelop the site as senior housing and town officials were asking the state to take over the Connector Road. 

District officials said it's not guaranteed that the state would take over the road linking Routes 7 and 8, built to service the mall back in the '80s, and that the state Department of Transportation had historically discouraged the town from asking. Even if it happened, it could take three to five years, during which no BHRD funds would be collected if the district is dissolved. The state would not replace the revenue they support, and they argued the state is facing its own budget issues making it unlikely they would want to take over.

The road district was created by an act of the Legislature and would require another act to dissolve it. The town meeting article asked for voter support for a home-rule petition to start that process.  

After the presentation, it was asked what the current financial status of the BHRD, given that JMJ hasn’t paid in a long time and if the district actually has the money or if it is dependent on the mall sale.

Mark Siegars, attorney for BHRD, reminded the room that the mall is under a purchase and sale agreement and if the sale closes, the district expects to receive more than a million dollars because of the lawsuit and lien, but does not have that cash yet. If the sale does not go through, BHRD will take the mall and sell it. The district still gets payments from Target, which is separate from the mall. 

There were also some questions on the district's history, with Select Board member Jason Breault asking if the mall did not have a high tax rate from the district, would it still be solvent. The exchange became heated between Siegars and BHRD Chair Bill Prendergast.

View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories