Letter: Golf Course Zoning Proposal Bad Planning

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Rditor:

We on the Williamstown Planning Board heard a petition about six months ago from Mike Deep, who owns the Waubeeka golf course. The following is an account of subsequent events.

Mr. Deep claimed the golf course is losing money and that a new hotel might keep it afloat.

Would the PB be behind rezoning the site to allow a hotel (presently not an allowed use in Rural Residence zones)? This was an unusual request, and one generally frowned on as "spot zoning” meaning that it would benefit not a swath of town but just one owner of one lot. The Planning Board agreed that in this case, enabling most of the golf course to stay as open space could also benefit the whole town, as it would keep the important southern gateway to the town with its gorgeous mountain views, so important to all of us residents as well as to our tourist industry.

The agreed upon idea was that he would take part of the property to develop as his hotel, and in return he would ensure that the rest of the property would be left as open space never to be built on.

Over the course of several meetings, we tried to hammer out a bylaw that would satisfy both parties, but there remained intractable sticking points such as how many acres the development would cover and how to ensure the open land would stay as open land.



Eventually it was clear we could not reach consensus. With the open-ended bylaw Mr. Deep wanted, the town would run the risk of a disaster: an inappropriately sized development for this crucial part of town, or worse still one that would start with enthusiasm and then run out of money and be abandoned after just a few years.

So we passed a motion saying the Planning Board was enthusiastically behind the idea of a country inn on the golf course (to help assure potential developers) and asking Mr. Deep to provide three items before we went any further: a market study studying the hotel needs for North Berkshire County, a schematic plan of his proposal, and a potential developer/partner, with whom we could discuss issues that would be important in ensuring a hotel that the town would feel was worth the unusual trade-off. Once we had that, we could craft the appropriate bylaw to accommodate his needs.

Not willing to provide the Planning Board's requests (though he provided partial answers at the recent public hearing), Mr. Deep is going for an end run around the board, with a citizen's petition that will be voted on at town meeting, bypassing the Planning Board.

The opinion of a majority of the Planning Board members remains opposed to this petition.

Development at any cost is not good planning.

Ann McCallum

McCallum is vice chairman of the Williamstown Planning Board.

 

 


Tags: letters to the editor,   town meeting 2016,   

If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Planners OK Preliminary Habitat Plan

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Planning Board on Tuesday agreed in principle to most of the waivers sought by Northern Berkshire Habitat for Humanity to build five homes on a Summer Street parcel.
 
But the planners strongly encouraged the non-profit to continue discussions with neighbors to the would-be subdivision to resolve those residents' concerns about the plan.
 
The developer and the landowner, the town's Affordable Housing Trust, were before the board for the second time seeking an OK for the preliminary subdivision plan. The goal of the preliminary approval process is to allow developers to have a dialogue with the board and stakeholders to identify issues that may come up if and when NBHFH brings a formal subdivision proposal back to the Planning Board.
 
Habitat has identified 11 potential waivers from the town's subdivision bylaw that it would need to build five single-family homes and a short access road from Summer Street to the new quarter-acre lots on the 1.75-acre lot the trust purchased in 2015.
 
Most of the waivers were received positively by the planners in a series of non-binding votes.
 
One, a request for relief from the requirement for granite or concrete monuments at street intersections, was rejected outright on the advice of the town's public works directors.
 
Another, a request to use open drainage to manage stormwater, received what amounted to a conditional approval by the board. The planners noted DPW Director Craig Clough's comment that while open drainage, per se, is not an issue for his department, he advised that said rain gardens not be included in the right of way, which would transfer ownership and maintenance of said gardens to the town.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories