Letter: Water Protection and Size at Waubeeka

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

If one only reads previous articles about the Waubeeka proposal to build a "country inn" just south of the Five Corners Historic District in Williamstown, you would think that there is a grand conspiracy to stifle development and thwart business growth by a selfish group of abuttors and tree-hugging conservationists. The devil is in the details.

Trust in a future unknown developer is a tricky thing. The applicant has already violated permits of both the Williamstown Conservation Commission and the Sign Commission. Not a good public relations tactic so far. "Trust but verify" means that the Planning Board is wise to place reasonable limits on the great unknown of this commercial development.

Yes, the applicant does need to give something back. The "trade-off" for rezoning Rural Residence 2 to allow a major hotel, spa, entertainment center with all-night lights, noise, alcohol, traffic and increased activity of many kinds, is to preserve areas of water resource importance that will not impact golfing or building.

The major concern is the 67-acre parcel at the far back end of the property, not used for golf, that is wooded, hilly, with many wet areas and small streams. That water protection area needs a "clean" Conservation Restriction (CR).


The second area of concern, in exchange for additional square feet of building, is to be determined by the Williamstown Conservation Commission, but assumed to be the watershed area along the West Branch of the Green River that passes through the northern edge of the course. That area would continue to be used for golf, but would be protected from future negative uses. Clean water is our most precious resource, as evidenced by nearby towns' pollutants coming to light. We need to be good stewards of all aquifers in Williamstown.

Also, size does matter. The developer's proposal of roughly 120 units (rooms?) is about the size of the current Williams Inn after the rear annex was built. It turned out to be too many rooms for sustained, year-round occupancy. You can pack a lot into Mr. Deep's proposed 10 acres, even with the town's height restriction. The "country inn" seems to be getting bigger and bigger with no square footage limits on buildings. It is referred to as a destination resort.

Thoughtful, careful planning for this unique site is needed. Thank you to the three brave members of the Planning Board for doing just that. They don't deserve the mean-spirited and nasty comments by some. No one is trying to sabotage the project, just to keep it within a tolerable scale!

We rely on dedicated, unpaid citizens to protect the health and safety of our people, environment, schools, etc. and vote for those who will do so. Of many good candidates, these stand out: Anne Hogeland and Sarah Gardner for Planning Board, Cynthia Payne for Select Board and Joe Bergeron for Elementary School Committee. Please give them your due consideration ... and vote.

Susan Schneski
Schneski is a former Planning Board member; she is not a Waubeeka abuttor. Williamstown, Mass.

 

 

 


Tags: election 2016,   endorsement,   town elections,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Williamstown Charter Review Panel OKs Fix to Address 'Separation of Powers' Concern

By Stephen DravisiBerkshires Staff
WILLIAMSTOWN, Mass. — The Charter Review Committee on Wednesday voted unanimously to endorse an amended version of the compliance provision it drafted to be added to the Town Charter.
 
The committee accepted language designed to meet concerns raised by the Planning Board about separation of powers under the charter.
 
The committee's original compliance language — Article 32 on the annual town meeting warrant — would have made the Select Board responsible for determining a remedy if any other town board or committee violated the charter.
 
The Planning Board objected to that notion, pointing out that it would give one elected body in town some authority over another.
 
On Wednesday, Charter Review Committee co-Chairs Andrew Hogeland and Jeffrey Johnson, both members of the Select Board, brought their colleagues amended language that, in essence, gives authority to enforce charter compliance by a board to its appointing authority.
 
For example, the Select Board would have authority to determine a remedy if, say, the Community Preservation Committee somehow violated the charter. And the voters, who elect the Planning Board, would have ultimate say if that body violates the charter.
 
In reality, the charter says very little about what town boards and committees — other than the Select Board — can or cannot do, and the powers of bodies like the Planning Board are regulated by state law.
 
View Full Story

More Williamstown Stories