Letter: Vote Yes on Pittsfield's Question 5

Letters to the EditorPrint Story | Email Story

To the Editor:

I'm a local real estate broker/owner of Gile Real Estate. As a broker, I see the money that we've given to other [Community Preservation Act] communities for the past 16 years in real estate document recording fees ($170 every time a property is purchased.)

Only the communities that have adopted CPA can access this state-matched fund that they're already paying into. In 2015, we estimate that 1,702 properties were sold in Pittsfield. At $170 each in document recording fees, that comes to $289,340 that was given away. And that is only properties that sold through the Berkshire Board of Realtors.

Based on last year's data, if we already had CPA, the local fund for Pittsfield would've generated approximately $497,546 for 2015 ($383,613 from local taxpayers plus the state match of $113,933; totaling $497,546). This doesn't include funds that come from larger grants and use CPA funds as the city's matching portion. Also the first $100,000 of assessed value is exempt for everyone, as are low-moderate income seniors, low-income residents.


Third quarter residential property sales are already up from what they were at this time in 2015. It isn't logical for us to keep losing money like this with every single transaction. When you see what the Community Preservation Act has done for other communities that adopt it, you realize the potential that it has for Pittsfield. A yes vote on Question 5 truly is a no-brainer.

CPA will help clean up blight in local neighborhoods which lessens crime activity and can keep our kids in school. You don't see nearly as much crime in safe, vibrant neighborhoods. CPA can rehab unused buildings and bring them back to life. More people will come to Pittsfield to live, and it will encourage others to stay. We can build new housing for seniors, veterans and low to moderate income families.

We can finally use the millions that we have been giving away since 2000, when CPA began. The use of this locally controlled money is a fair and transparent process! Please vote yes on Question 5 in November and visit www.preservepittsfield.org to learn more and to see actual ballot language.
 

Beth VanNess
Broker/Owner Gile Real Estate
Pittsfield, Mass.

 

 


Tags: ballot measure,   CPA,   election 2016,   


If you would like to contribute information on this article, contact us at info@iberkshires.com.

Dalton Town Hall Lift Solutions in Development

By Sabrina DammsiBerkshires Staff
DALTON, Mass. — Solutions are being sought for the lift in Town Hall that has been out of service since December because of safety concerns. 
 
Building Grounds Superintendent Jeff Burch told the Americans with Disabilities Act Committee meeting on Tuesday night that Hill Engineering has been contracted to come up with a potential option.
 
The lift is in the police station and the only other lift for the town hall is in the library, which is not accessible after library hours. 
 
Previous attempts by Garaventa Lift to repair it have been unsuccessful. 
 
Replacing it in the same location is not an option because the new weight limit requirement went from 400 pounds to 650 pounds. Determining whether the current railings can hold 650 pounds is outside the scope of Garaventa's services to the town. 
 
The first option Hill has proposed is to install a vertical lift in a storage closet to the left of the police entrance, which would go up into the town account's office. 
 
A member of the committee expressed concern that the current office location may not be suitable as it could hinder access to the police station during construction. 
 
View Full Story

More Pittsfield Stories